White House may have violated ethics rule with retroactive waiver: report

White House may have violated ethics rule with retroactive waiver: report
© Greg Nash

The White House may have granted chief strategist Stephen Bannon a retroactive ethics waiver allowing him to communicate with editors at his former employer, Breitbart News, The New York Times reported Thursday.

If, in fact, the waiver was granted after an ethics complaint took aim at Bannon's discussions with Breitbart editors, the White House could be in violation of federal ethics rules.

“There is no such thing as a retroactive waiver,” Walter ShaubWalter Michael ShaubWH lawyer in charge of policing Trump officials' ethics to leave: report Ex-White House ethics chief: Sarah Sanders tweet violates ethics laws Ex-ethics chief: Melania Trump's visit to migrant shelter a 'flim flam con job' MORE, the director of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), told the Times. “If you need a retroactive waiver, you have violated a rule.”

ADVERTISEMENT
The waiver in question was undated and does not name Bannon specifically, but it would allow him to freely communicate with editors at the far-right news outlet, where he was once its executive chairman. 

President TrumpDonald John TrumpBrennan fires new shot at Trump: ‘He’s drunk on power’ Trump aides discussed using security clearance revocations to distract from negative stories: report Trump tried to dissuade Melania from 'Be Best' anti-bullying campaign: report MORE signed an executive order in January that would prevent Bannon from discussing issues he dealt with in his past job with Breitbart employees for two years. But Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a liberal watchdog group, claimed that Bannon maintained communications with Breitbart editors despite the order.

The waiver allowing Bannon and others to communicate with news organizations was one of several released by the White House on Wednesday, after a bitter fight with the OGE, which had ordered the administration to make the waivers public.