White House: Tentative deal reached on defense spending

White House: Tentative deal reached on defense spending
© Getty Images

President TrumpDonald John TrumpWH aides intentionally compose Trump tweets with grammatical mistakes: report Holder: DOJ, FBI should reject Trump's requests Ex-Trump campaign adviser rips claims of spy in campaign: It's 'embarrassing' MORE and congressional leaders reached a “tentative agreement” on Thursday to raise defense spending levels as part of a year-end government funding package, according to a White House official.

The leaders were “moving toward an agreement” on nondefense spending after a meeting in the Oval Office designed to resolve the contentious funding battle, the official said.

The official requested anonymity to discuss private conversations between Trump and the top four congressional leaders. 

Democrats don’t have nearly as optimistic view of the outcome of Thursday’s meeting, however.

Democratic leaders insist there cannot be a deal on the defense spending number without an agreement in tandem on spending for non-defense programs, a position they have long held.

Even Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSenators near deal on sexual harassment policy change Blankenship third-party bid worries Senate GOP Overnight Finance: Trump signs repeal of auto-loan policy | Justices uphold contracts that bar employee class-action suits | US, China trade war 'on hold' MORE (R-Ky.) had a less rosy assessment of how much progress had been made.

Asked if negotiators were any closer to a deal on the spending caps, McConnell replied, “I wouldn’t say that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Another person familiar with the meeting said Democrats were willing to go along with $54 billion in annual defense spending, as long as it was “matched with an equal increase on [the] nondefense side.”

“That’s been the primary point of debate thus far in the talks, and it was in the meeting,” said the source.

“The president had a constructive meeting with congressional leadership and Defense Secretary [James] Mattis, and the parties agreed on the need for eliminating the defense sequester to deal with the grave national security threats we face,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement. 

Such an agreement could be a breakthrough in the government funding debate on Capitol Hill. 

Democrats and Republicans have thus far been unable to agree on spending levels for fiscal 2018. The crux of the issue are budget caps that were imposed in a 2011 bipartisan spending agreement. 

GOP leaders have pushed for an increase in defense spending levels, but Democrats have demanded a reciprocal boost in domestic spending. 

Emerging from the meeting, leaders stopped short of announcing a formal agreement. 

“We had a productive conversation on a wide variety of issues,” Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerOvernight Finance: Trump signs repeal of auto-loan policy | Justices uphold contracts that bar employee class-action suits | US, China trade war 'on hold' Free traders applaud Trump as China tariff threat recedes The Hill's 12:30 Report — Sponsored by Delta Air Lines — Frenzy over Kennedy retirement rumors | Trump challenges DOJ MORE (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy PelosiNancy Patricia D'Alesandro PelosiDems expand 2018 message to ‘draining the swamp’ McCarthy denies that he's discussed plan to force out Ryan Juan Williams: Trump gives life to the left MORE (D-Calif.) said in a joint statement. “Nothing specific has been agreed to, but discussions continue.”

Democrats said they want “to strengthen our national defense with parity for our domestic budget.”

They also demanded action on renewing the Children's Health Insurance Program, veterans funding, money to fight opioid addiction and a fix for young immigrants living in the U.S.

Speaker Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanHillicon Valley: Mnuchin urges antitrust review of tech | Progressives want to break up Facebook | Classified election security briefing set for Tuesday | Tech CEOs face pressure to appear before Congress Feehery: An opening to repair our broken immigration system GOP chairman in talks with 'big pharma' on moving drug pricing bill MORE (R-Wis.) and McConnell called the meeting “productive” and said they “both focused on the need to reach a long-term funding agreement that provides adequate resources for our military.”

But they reiterated their stance that immigration should be dealt with separately, which has been a major holdup in the budget talks. 

The White House also said it wants to keep immigration talks separate from the spending package and restated its demands for border-wall funding in exchange for action on immigration. 

Sanders said the leaders would resume negotiations Friday on a long-term budget deal.

The House and Senate passed a stopgap spending bill Thursday afternoon to avert a shutdown and buy more time for talks. 

Defense hawks and conservative members of the House Freedom Caucus had been threatening to derail a vote on a two-week funding bill, which is needed to avoid a government shutdown on Friday at midnight, unless they got a commitment from leadership to boost money for the Pentagon before the end of the year.

To lock up the necessary Republican votes for the stopgap measure, House GOP leadership promised to push for a spending package that would fund defense at higher levels through September as part of the next continuing resolution that will be needed on Dec. 22, said Republican Study Committee Chairman Mark WalkerBradley (Mark) Mark WalkerKey House chairman floats changes to immigration bill Food stamp revamp sparks GOP fight over farm bill House chaplain is a champion of true Catholicism — Paul Ryan is not MORE (R-N.C.).

Walker said Ryan committed to advocating for the defense-stopgap package with the White House, though the Speaker declined to acknowledge such a deal earlier in the day.

“I’ll take him at his word,” Walker told reporters Thursday. “This was part of our meeting, that he’s working on our behalf."

—Updated at 6:50 p.m.