THE HILL
 

Baucus bill booed at Obama health rally

By Sam Youngman - 09/17/09 11:52 AM ET

President Obama's mention of Sen. Max Baucus's healthcare proposal drew boos Thursday at a healthcare rally at the University of Maryland.

By contrast, the left-leaning crowd cheered Obama when he endorseed a public health insurance option, which is considered a core provision for liberal lawmakers but is absent from Baucus's (D-Mont.) proposal.

The president’s speech in College Park, Md., was part of a return to campaign mode aimed at his attempts to drum up support for his embattled healthcare proposal.

Baucus, a centrist and chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, unveiled his bill Wednesday. He had been working behind the scenes for months with a group of three Republicans and two Democrats in an attempt to craft a bipartisan measure. But Republicans and liberal Democrats criticized the legislation upon its release, and the White House was largely noncommittal.

Obama did not endorse Baucus's bill at the rally. But he assailed critics of his broader goal, threatening those who mischaracterize his plans that he will "call them out."

"I've heard a lot of Republicans say they want to kill 'ObamaCare,'" Obama said. "Some even raise money off of it."

By the end of the rally, the president had brought the crowd firmly back to his side, leading them in the now-familiar chants of "Fired up, ready to go."

Earlier Thursday, the White House formally announced that the president had directed Health and Human Service Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to begin offering $25 million in grants for demonstration projects to find ways to improve patient safety while limiting medical malpractice suits.

"I don't think this is a silver bullet, but I want to explore the idea," Obama said in Maryland.

The move, announced during the president's joint address to Congress last week, was largely viewed as an olive branch to Republicans who have long faulted frivolous lawsuits for raising the cost of insurance.

Trial lawyers, one of the most reliable Democratic donor bases, have long fought attempts at tort reform on Capitol Hill, but Sebelius said that the president is not trying to use the outreach as "a lever" in the healthcare debate.

Sebelius told reporters earlier Thursday that the launch of the demonstration projects can track with legislative language that explores ways to limit malpractice suits, and the president's directive "captures some of the legislative intent and jumpstarts it."

"I don't think this is an either-or," she said. "I see this as very complementary to some of the proposals on the table."


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/59245-baucus-bill-booed-at-healthcare-rally

Comments (13)

yeah, $25 million for some pilot project is not what people mean when they say "tort reform". as for, "taking a look" at the idea, how bout we "take a look" at the public option and get back to you in, oh, say, 4 years? just make sure to leave a forwardnig address with the post office.besides, what form "reform" takes is small potatoes compared to…how are we going to pay for it? OMG we are TRILLIONS in debt, Obama is schedule, per CBO, to rake up amounts od debt equal to ALL presidents that went before him!!BY jill on 09/17/2009 at 15:24
From July…Presiden t Barack Obama's appointment of Alexia Kelley, founder of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, as director of the Department of Health and Human Services' Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives took the pro-choice movement by surprise.What Greenberger and others will want to know is why the post, which includes oversight of the department's faith-based grant-making in family planning, HIV and AIDS and in small-scale research into the effect of religion and spirituality on early sexual behavior, has gone to someone who both believes abortion should be illegal and opposes contraception.The HHS budget for family-planning services grants to faith-based and community groups is more than $20 million. Can pro-family-planning religious groups expect a fair deal from a director who believes that birth control, even for married couples, is immoral? Will programs that provide contraception to adolescents get funded? Obama's Feb. 5 Executive Order establishing a new Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships gave the office and its 11 satellites in federal agencies a policy role on the issues that are at the core of HHS's sexual and reproductive health work: addressing teen pregnancy and reducing the need for abortion. How can an opponent of the single most effective way to do both — contraception — lead that effort in HHS enthusiasticall y and effectively?BY Robert on 09/17/2009 at 17:45
JILL: OMG we are TRILLIONS in debt, Obama is schedule, per CBO, to rake up amounts od debt equal to ALL presidents that went before him!!Yes, we're in debt. That's what we inherited from Pres. Bush. We can't dig our way out by not spending. While I don't support all of the bailouts, I do agree with the basic premise that letting our economy collapse by freezing all spending would not improve things.On a bigger picture, health care costs are spiraling out of control and are on target to bankrupt us if we don't rein them in. One of the interesting things about the debate about the "public option" is the fact that bills with a strong PO are CHEAPER — by CBO measurements — than the supposedly "fiscally responsible" Baucus bill (which is, in truth, simply a vast bailout and giveaway for the insurance industries). To the tune of 200-300 *billion* dollars cheaper. Why? Simple: because the public option *will be effective*, by all estimates, at controlling rising health care costs. If you don't believe me, look up the official CBO projections.So here's an interesting quandary; why are those who are most concerned about "fiscal responsibility" so dead-set against the CHEAPER alternative for health care reform?BY Tom C on 09/17/2009 at 18:26
There's a brushfire burning out here in flyover country and all the DC insiders better wake up soon. The false charges of racism, the lies, the political thuggery are starting to add up. If the DC pols ignore this brushfire they will live to see it consume their "homes" in DC while the citizens they have impugned and maligned dance around the flames.However, the president could stand up on his back legs, act like an adult and put a halt to all of this.But, he has his own agenda and I can assure you it has nothing to do with racial healing, national security or economic stability.All of those work against the pallette of chaos he wishes to create. Politicians of all stripes in DC better wake up and see the smoke. It's much closer than they think.BY Nick Danger on 09/18/2009 at 09:28
How can anything this person says be believed? They stack the audience tell them what to say when to cheer. I am sure there had to be protesters outside. Why don't they report that? This administration is so corrupt they are a disgrace and embarassment to this country.BY Mary Triola on 09/18/2009 at 10:33
Wake up you younguns! The health care bill will be paid by YOU! Idiot! Just WHERE do you think the government gets their money! Have you been used to a FREE RIDE from MOMMY AND DADDY?! ITS OVER FOOL! Its on your back now! And guess what, for those clowns who have not bothered to READ the BILL, YOU MUST HAVE INSURANCE AND YOU WILL PAY FOR IT OR BE CHARGED A HUGE FINE BY YOUR FRIENDS AT THE IRS! Be careful what you ask for…you just might get it!BY Dave on 09/18/2009 at 11:00
He might as well continue campaigning. He surely isn't leading… I suspect Axelrod and Emanuel are actually running the country.BY Bill on 09/18/2009 at 11:11
Jill, yes, we are trillions in debt. When Bush took office we had a surplus of 2 trillion and when he left we had a deficit of 2 trillion. Why weren't you saying anything then? Nick Danger, that sounds like a threat. Is it?Mary, I don't think the audience was stacked. I do think those who believe in President Obama's goals wanted to hear him. The even was openly announced on the news.Dave, you and all of us will be paying for it. We can either pay the government, or the insurance companies and doctors and the million dollar bonuses and in our darkest hour be dumped because we are sick. I might add, doing something about healthcare might stem 70% of the people going bankrupt, since that is how many people lose everything because they got sick.Bill, I think he is doing fine, though trying to appease the right too much. I suppose you would rather have the previous admin tossing your money to their buddies instead of someone trying to actually help the public.BY s on 09/18/2009 at 13:20
The only bright spot in all this is that this administration's behavior is so terrible that it may turn out good. Possibly the democratic party will be destroyed.BY Ron on 09/18/2009 at 18:50
The Baucus bill is a piece of garbage that belongs in the outhouse cesspool along with the rest of the liberal democrat schmucks and sheep supporting radical health care reform. Who is going to pay the trillions for the reform? ObamaCare should be killed.BY agbruno on 09/18/2009 at 22:20

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.