THE HILL
 

Obama defends U.S. on climate change

By Sam Youngman - 09/22/09 09:15 AM ET

President Barack Obama downplayed congressional delays in climate change legislation as he worked to win over world leaders who are skeptical of America’s commitment to the issue.

Addressing the U.N. Climate Change Summit in New York on Tuesday, Obama claimed the U.S. has made more progress in the past year than at any other time. He boasted of House legislation earlier this year that capped carbon emissions, but he did not mention Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-Nev.) recent announcement that the bill would not be taken up in the upper chamber until next year.

Obama did say one committee in the Senate has already acted, but he failed to mention that only the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee has passed an energy bill and that the bill does not contain any cap on emissions.

Reid's announcement earlier this month signaled that another one of the president's signature domestic agenda items had stalled as the debate over healthcare reform continued to dominate Congress and the White House.

The delay on climate change legislation was viewed as a major setback for the president ahead of December's U.N. Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen, Denmark. European leaders already view the U.S. skeptically on the issue.

Despite that, Obama sought to sell a silver lining to world leaders, boasting of progress on the issue that he and other Democrats say was blunted during former President George W. Bush's administration.

"It is true that for too many years, mankind has been slow to respond to or even recognize the magnitude of the climate threat. It is true of my own country as well," Obama said. "We recognize that. But this is a new day. It is a new era. And I am proud to say that the United States has done more to promote clean energy and reduce carbon pollution in the last eight months than at any other time in our history."

The president acknowledged the "bumpy road" ahead.

"It is work that will not be easy," Obama said. "As we head toward Copenhagen, there should be no illusions that the hardest part of our journey is in front of us. We seek sweeping but necessary change in the midst of a global recession, where every nation’s most immediate priority is reviving their economy and putting their people back to work."

But the president said that "difficulty is no excuse for complacency" and pressed world leaders to "seize the opportunity to make Copenhagen a significant step forward in the global fight against climate change."

The president also conceded that the largest emitters, like the U.S. and China, have a responsibility to step up and address not only their own emissions but also those of developing countries.

China has been slow to come to the table on the matter, and Obama seemed to be bringing them into the debate, willingly or not.

The president did seem to push the idea that the debate over the reality of climate change is largely in the past, even as some Republicans continue to be skeptical, especially of legislative efforts they say will raise taxes on the middle class and hamper business interests.

"The good news is that after too many years of inaction and denial, there is finally widespread recognition of the urgency of the challenge before us," Obama said. "We know what needs to be done."

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/59743-obama-defends-us-action-on-climate-change

Comments (3)

My God this drives me so crazy. Global Warming caused my mankind is a myth. Ian Pilmer's book Heaven and Earth, Global Warming: The Missing Science is a blockbuster that explodes the global warming myth. It turned the tide in Australia. One of the most remarkable changes brought about by Pilmer’s book occurred on April 13, when leading global warming hysteric Paul Sheehan—who writes for the main Sydney newspaper, the Sydney Morning Herald, which has done as much to hype the threat of global warming as any Australian newspaper—revie wed Plimer's book and admitted he was taken aback. He describes Plimer, correctly, as "one of Australia's foremost Earth scientists," and praised the book as "brilliantly argued" and "the product of 40 years' research and breadth of scholarship." What does Plimer's book say? Here is Sheehan's summary: Much of what we have read about climate change, [Plimer] argues, is rubbish, especially the computer modeling on which much current scientific opinion is based, which he describes as "primitive."…The Earth's climate is driven by the receipt and redistribution of solar energy. Despite this crucial relationship, the sun tends to be brushed aside as the most important driver of climate. Calculations on supercomputers are primitive compared with the complex dynamism of the Earth's climate and ignore the crucial relationship between climate and solar energy. To reduce modern climate change to one variable, CO2, or a small proportion of one variable—human-induced CO2—is not science. To try to predict the future based on just one variable (CO2) in extraordinarily complex natural systems is folly. In response, this is Sheehan's conclusion: "Heaven and Earth is an evidence-based attack on conformity and orthodoxy, including my own, and a reminder to respect informed dissent and beware of ideology subverting evidence." This cannot be interpreted as anything but a capitulation. It cedes to the global warming rejectionists the high ground of being "evidence-based," and it accepts the characterizatio n of the global warming promoters as dogmatic conformists.Read the book, then debunk it. I dare anyone. How about you Obama? I mean, it would make sense if we understood what is and is not science before passing costly legislation. Oh wait, I am assuming people will do what makes sense. Maybe the Tea Parties need to send multiple copies of this book to every Senator and Representative. And maybe about a thousand copies to the White House. Get your head out the sand.BY GJMerits on 09/22/2009 at 11:11
GJMerits: Sheehan's revew of the book, at least what you quote, sounds in no way like a "capitulation."Of course, you stereotype by claiming that people worried about global warming claim CO2 is the only cause, when we know it's not even the only anthropogenic cause!Other than selective quotations from a review which is not what you claim it is, also, you offer nothing to support your conclusion that "the tide has turned in Australia."BY Socratic Gadfly on 09/22/2009 at 12:19
Go to Real Clear Politics and search for Plimer. You will see two stories that provide all the details you need. I also challenge you to read the book and refute it. And by the way, these are not selective quotations, it is a quote directly from Sheehan himself. I work in electromagnetic modeling and I am also familiar with chaos theory or what is also known as complexity theory. Anybody familiar with numerical modeling and complexity theory knows it is impossible to predict climate. Even local weather is so complex that it cannot be predicted any more than three days out - if you are lucky. Using many fields of science as his reference Mr. Plimer shows conclusively that global warming has occurred in the past when CO2 levels dropped. Sorry, but his book is fact based and you are in denial of real science. By the way, the book does an excellent job of exposing the so-called experts often cited in the IPCC report. The best one - a guy who specializes in fossil faeces. That makes him an expert in climate? At least he is on the right track as man-made global warming is pretty much full of sh*t.BY GJMerits on 09/22/2009 at 17:11

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.