THE HILL
 

Despite pressure, McChrystal to hold firm on request for troops

By Aaron Blake - 09/27/09 06:00 PM ET

Gen. Stanley McChrystal said he will not back down from his request for additional troops in Afghanistan, even in the face of political pressure.

Speaking on CBS’s “60 Minutes” on Sunday night, the new U.S. commander in Afghanistan said the pressure to not request more troops will have no affect on his actions going forward.
 

“Doesn’t affect me at all, and I take this extraordinarily seriously,” McChrystal said in the interview, which was taped a month ago. “I believe that what I am responsible to do is to give my best assessment.”
 
McChrystal’s recent report -- delivered to Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen on Friday and asking for 40,000 more troops -- is a hot-button issue on Capitol Hill, with Democrats hitting the Sunday talk show circuit earlier in the day and saying that the administration should weigh McChrystal’s request very carefully. President Barack Obama has been resistant to the idea of adding troops in Afghanistan.

"I think the president is correct to take his time, to really examine what the alternatives are at this time," Senate Select Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said, echoing fellow senator and former Navy Secretary Jim Webb (D-Va.).


Obama authorized 21,000 additional troops for Afghanistan as soon as he came into office in January and the last from that order are still deploying to the region.

McChrystal deflected when asked whether he thought he would get what he is asking for from Washington.

“I’m confident that I will have an absolute chance to provide my assessment and to make my recommendations,” he said.

McChrystal also stated that he had only spoken to Obama once in 70 days since taking over as commander in the eight-year-old war.

He said the United States often hasn’t done what it should have during those eight years, and he is trying to change the culture of the U.S. presence in the country as the Taliban rebounds. That includes cracking down on aggressive driving by U.S. convoys and asking soldiers to take on additional risks in the name of protecting Afghan citizens.

“There’s an awful lot of bad habits we’ve got to deprogram,” McChrystal said.

He said time is of the essence in a war that experts say has become more difficult than Iraq, and that progress needs to be made fast.

He has been blunt about the prospect of failure, and he said he will be honest if and when that prospect becomes a reality.

“We could do good thing in Afghanistan for the next 100 years and fail,” he said, “because we’re doing a lot of good things, and it just doesn’t add up to success.”

-- This story was updated at 9:57 a.m.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/60487-despite-pressure-in-congress-mcchrystal-to-hold-firm-on-request-for-troops

Comments (9)

" "I think the president is correct to take his time, to really examine what the alternatives are at this time," Senate Select Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said, echoing fellow senator and former Navy Secretary Jim Webb (D-Va.)."I bet they believe the same about "health care reform!"BY Mike K., Norwich, CT on 09/28/2009 at 07:34
Why we won't win.US: Recruitment, Travel,Training , Medical, Meals, Pay, Benefits, Equipment, Hot showers, Cigarettes, Candy, Newspapers, Fresh milk. Weapons, Clothes, Boots.This equals approximately $450K per soldier over a 36 month period. Higher if stationed overseas. Then we bring them home— some with continuing benefits. 36 months on average and its over. Taliban and Al-qaida: They get a weapon and ammunition—no charge. They are at homeand speak the language. They blend-in. No USO shows, No helicopters bringing Christmas dinners, No letters from home or satellite phone calls to mom and the kids, No email, No Ipods.They are not looking forward to going home—they are home.So they have one focus—without an exit strategy.They are winning because they have nothing to lose.BY Dave S on 09/28/2009 at 08:15
Dave S, you are an idiot. The exit strategy is to weaken the enemy to the point where they are no longer a threat to the civilian population and to restore order to this country. That is the goal and the soldeirs know it. That is the exit strategy. Once that happens, we come home. You speak as if serving our country is a day at the country club … like it's a benefit filled media junkit for a new movie. Our soldiers work hard, suffer and do all they can to protect, defeat and win. You're a typical "run for the hills" lib. We "conservatives" fight the wars so you libs enjoy the fruits of our sacrifice/suffering so you can freely spout off. You are welcome!BY Ryan S on 09/28/2009 at 09:24
I wrote Webb the letter below.Senator Webb, could you please explain to me why it is taking so long to get additional troops to Gen. McChrystal for Afghanistan. The Administration wants Healthcare, Clunkers Program, TARP, cap and trade and other programs rushed through without any explanation. So please tell me why all of the sudden this administration is taking so long to act? General McChrystalBY Ken on 09/28/2009 at 09:35
If you are not in this thing to win then bring troops home. No member of the military wants to give his/her life for nothing, or a lost cause. This country has been ran by mismatch group of people since it became one. It is a group of families that run everything. He with the biggest group has more say. Let the taliban have it! If the people there don't have enough intestanial foritude (gut) to take on this group the not one member of our military or money should be lost for them. We need to pay our bills here first. We are building more than they every have and it will be destroyed because it is a 3rd world country. Oh yeah! why are we helping to safe a country that only produces opium! If we are in a war then fight! ie, ww1, ww2, We have not won or finished since, in other words. INFIDAL COME HOME but remember we do have a big stick and when you find a snake nest use the stick till they are under controlBY nomorehelp on 09/28/2009 at 09:36
Can you Libs explain to me how Obama has the time to go to Denmark to pimp the Olympics for Chicago and has no time to decide to send troops or not to Afghanistan? ASAP Please…BY Ranchera on 09/28/2009 at 10:24
RE: Ranchera "explain to me how Obama has the time to go to Denmark"You're mind is still in "Bush" land. Most leaders (and people) can run (or ride a segway) and chew gum at the same time.BY JeremyIsett on 09/28/2009 at 11:55
We have civilian control of our military. A responsible "general" would give the CIC real options, not my way or the high way. Of course, these crusader wars were begun and continue to be waged on false pretenses, violating the honor of our troops and the oaths they took. The honorable decision is to withdraw all troops. From everywhere. Is there not enough unspeakable death swimming on and in the oceans to destroy the world a few dozen times over? War-hungry conservatives are a cancer on this nation. Those who make enemies of complete strangers by the *billions* deserve to be ignored.End the crusader wars now.BY James on 09/28/2009 at 14:22
Thanks Ryan, Dave is an idiot…hot showers is right because the water in a weekly shower bag is 120* all the time, there is No cold water. Marines buy alot of their own equiptment. You don't what you are talking about, go to Afghanistan=[***] then write about how great it is for our troops and let us see your legs blown off, while you feel sorry for the loser Taliban.BY lynn mahoney on 10/01/2009 at 15:32

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.