THE HILL
 

Obama decision on Afghanistan strategy due in 'a matter of weeks,' says Jones

By Michael O'Brien - 10/04/09 09:58 AM ET

President Barack Obama will make a decision on how to proceed in Afghanistan in "a matter of weeks," his national security advisor said Sunday.

Retired Gen. James L. Jones, who serves as national security advisor, said that the U.S. military effort in Afghanistan is in no imminent danger of failure, and that the president would consider a variety of broad, strategic directions to pursue before determining whether he would grant a top general's request for more troops.

Jones said Obama would decide on Afghanistan policy in "a matter of weeks" during an appearance on CBS's "Face the Nation" Sunday morning.

"We have time on the president's schedule," Jones said. "He's going to devote an enormous amount of his time to lead us do this."

During interviews on CBS and CNN's "State of the Union," Jones explained that the president would be consulting with top military and civilians leadership in determining how to proceed in Afghanistan in light of Gen. Stanley McChrystal's recommendation to send more troops, lest the eight-year effort in that country fail.

"At the end of the day, the right way to do this is to present the president with a set of options on what he can do," Jones said on CBS.

"In the coming weeks, we will have vigorous debates," Jones said on CNN. "There will be alternative views presented, and I'm quite sure we'll come up with the right solution."

Republican lawmakers have urged Obama to act quickly on the president's recommendation for more troops, while the president's Democratic allies in Congress have been less demanding of a quick decision.

Jones emphasized that the president would not take into consideration the political popularity of any decision when coming to conclusions about strategy going forward.

"I don't play politics, and I certainly don't play it with national security, neither does anyone else I know," Jones said on CNN. "I can assure you that the president of the United States is not playing to any political base."

Jones seemed to temper, though, the arguments from McChrystal and Republicans that Afghanistan could fail quickly without more troops. While Jones didn't tip the administration's hand in terms of a decision, he said that Afghanistan was at no imminent risk of failing.

"The good news that Americans should at least feel good about is that the al-Qaeda presence is very diminished. The problem is the next step in this is the sanctuaries across the border," Jones told CNN. "But I don't foresee the return of the Taliban and I want to be clear that Afghanistan is not in imminent danger of falling."

The National Security Advisor also stressed that the decision Obama makes will take into account factors more broad than McChrystal's troop recommendation.

"I think the end is much more complicated than adding X number of troops," he said. "It would be unwise to rush to a final judgment here."

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/61527-afghanistan-decision-due-in-a-matter-of-weeks-says-gen-jones

Comments (10)

A matter of weeks? By that time, Rome will be burned to the ground, and Obama will be left holding a fiddle.BY Mark on 10/04/2009 at 18:31
"The National Security Advisor also stressed that the decision Obama makes will take into account factors more broad than McChrystal's troop recommendation."Other factors like Joe Biden's plan for Afghanistan, because as we all know, Biden has more knowledge of the situation, and more military and strategic know-than McChrystal and the other top military brass pushing for more troops. Seriously, if the media was not so enamored of Obama, the notion that this adminstration is considering the adoption of a plan devised by Biden instead of implementing the recommendations of McChrystal would be getting pilloried on a daily basis. If so much weren't at stake, it would be absolutely hilarious.BY Mark on 10/04/2009 at 18:34
I take it from Jones's and Obama's comments that McChrystal had no good reason to request an additional 40,000 troops and rushed to judgment on the request. As Jones put it "I think the end is much more complicated than adding X number of troops," he said. "It would be unwise to rush to a final judgment here." What a vote of confidence for your hand selected General.Of course, no one at The Hill as enough guts to ask the question: If Obama got the strategy wrong just five moths earlier, what makes anyone think he will get it right this time? But, no one really expects The Hill to seriously question Obama.Let the cheerleading continue.BY Brian Goettl on 10/04/2009 at 20:15
The d*mn leftists really screwed the pooch with the election of this utter fool of a man. Barry Obama sure as hell had ALL all the answers last summer when he was trashing our military and anyone involved with leading the operations in Afghan. So who is really surprised that this failure of a man didn't have a freaking clue about anything he was glorified by the MSM for talking about.Hell, it was Hillary Clinton who told all you leftist idiots that even though Barry had been given the Chair of the Subcommittee on Afghanistan, Barry Obama NEVER had a single meeting in over three years, he was too busy running for President.This man is a true piece of sh*t.BY LogicalUS on 10/04/2009 at 20:49
Sit back troops and relax. As soon as the Anointed One recovers from his failure (surprise! surprise!) in Chicago, maybe he'll get around to you. Stay low and God Bless.BY RealityCheck on 10/05/2009 at 10:28
We need to get the right equipment and more troops over there to survive this war. It is imperative that this be done. We all have loved ones over there and and none of us want to see more and more troops getting killed. Ok Abama pls. step up and do what is right. You have the chance now to show us what you are all about and how you want to help us all!BY My Sons in the Army on 10/05/2009 at 18:03
Weeks? This is not a complicated decision. Ask the Generals on the ground what they want, then give it to them. How can he second guess a General who makes the military his life. Seriously?BY Mark X on 10/05/2009 at 18:57
the real tragedy here is that during a time of war our president has to debate the known fact that our troops need more equipment and reinforcements, as though general McCrystal's statement was some theoretical suggestion with no supporting facts. Also the fact that there is any opposition to this so called theoretical suggestion from capital hill, its a shame that it will take weeks when the answer was so clearly placed in front of them. I hope that the Commander and Chief makes the correct decision, and makes it soon because i do believe that afghanistan is in imminent danger of being lost.BY bob on 10/05/2009 at 23:33
Jones is a conventional guy and does not like special ops to begin with Will shoot down unconeventional warfare any time he can. Need I remind him he IS NOT in the chain of command at all as an adviser. McChrystal is a Combatant Commander and reports directley to the SECDEF and PRES.BY malcolm on 10/07/2009 at 09:11
Obama we dont have time for you to sit around and play your political games .We have a US military that needs more help. It is a slap in the face to the Generals that serve I country 24/7 , for you to take your sweet time in making a decision on their request. They were hired to do a job ,let them do it. All your worried about is the popularity vote . How it will effect you in the polls. I am for doing whatever our Generals recommend. For the record my husband is in the US Army , he has not been deployed yet but would proudley serve his country if needed. While you sit around and do nothing, we have other solders that need our help. Needed our support yesterday, not three weeks from now. You know when its all said and done , the ones that claim to be your friends today may not be you friend tommorow, so I hope you really take into account what our Generals request, they have our troops and our countrys best interest at hand. Shame on you if you choose the popularity vote over doing what right for our armed services.BY Lynn Brown on 10/27/2009 at 22:50

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.