THE HILL
 

Stimulus data showing 30K jobs draw GOP criticism

By Walter Alarkon - 10/15/09 06:38 PM ET

Data published Thursday showed contracts from the $787 billion economic stimulus created or saved 30,083 jobs, prompting more criticism from Republicans that the package was a failure.

The White House defended the partial data, which included jobs saved or created from contracts that made up just 5 percent of the $339 billion in stimulus funds spent through September.

Though White House economists stressed that the data was incomplete, they still used it to argue that 1.2 million jobs had been either saved or created by the stimulus through September.

“All signs — from private estimates to this fragmentary data — point to the conclusion that the Recovery Act did indeed create or save about 1 million jobs in its first seven months, a much-needed lift in a very difficult period for our economy,” said Jared Bernstein, the chief economist for Vice President Joe Biden.

But the small number of jobs reported Thursday by stimulus recipients highlights the political dilemma for Democrats.

Unemployment has jumped nearly two percentage points since the stimulus became law and is expected to continue to rise.

Obama administration economists arguing for the stimulus in January had said that the package would keep unemployment below 8 percent.

While Wall Street banks are seeing record profits, millions of Americans are looking for jobs, and midterm elections for Congress are now looming.

That’s led the administration and congressional leaders to mull the extension of several provisions in the stimulus to try to create jobs and put money in the pockets of people struggling through what the White House now calls the “great recession.”

President Barack Obama called on Congress on Wednesday to give $250 checks to seniors who won’t be receiving a cost-of-living increase in their Social Security benefits this year due to low inflation.

Administration officials also have signaled their support for extending expiring stimulus provisions for increased unemployment benefits and COBRA health insurance for the unemployed.

In the Senate, members of both parties have called for extending the $8,000 first-time homebuyer’s tax credit, while Sens. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) and Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) this week offered legislation to expand that credit to most homebuyers.

“There is going to be a period of growth right now, but the job piece is what’s lagging,” White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel told PBS this week. “And that’s the part that the president wants to see get another kick-start.”

But Democrats face political problems in pursuing more stimulus. The budget deficit hit a record $1.4 trillion in the last fiscal year, and pushing for more stimulus would imply the $787 billion package wasn’t enough. Administration officials have avoided calling any additional measures “a second stimulus,” and have noted that most of the spending on government programs won’t take place until next year and 2011.

Both the Obama administration and Republicans are making the stimulus the centerpiece of economic messages as they head into 2010.

Obama on Thursday touted the stimulus during a visit to New Orleans, arguing that it has “helped to stop the bleeding” and is a first step to an economic recovery.

White House economists said in September that the stimulus had saved or created roughly 1 million jobs, noting that their estimate is in line with those of private economists and the independent Congressional Budget Office. Thursday’s data, though seemingly small, was in line with those projections, according to the White House recovery office.

The reported jobs number of 30,083 came out of contracts that made up 5 percent of the stimulus spending so far. As a result, the administration argues that if the same rate of jobs produced applied to the rest of the $339 billion in spent stimulus funds, approximately 600,000 jobs would have been directly produced by the stimulus.

The administration reaches its estimated 1.2 million figure by arguing that an equal number of jobs were indirectly created by the stimulus. Republicans scoffed at those figures.

The Obama administration plans to post online additional reports for stimulus grant and loan recipients on Oct. 30.
Republicans said that the stimulus will turn into a campaign issue that will work against Democrats.

The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) took Thursday’s initial stimulus reports to mean that the stimulus created or saved few jobs, especially in the home districts of vulnerable Democrats.

“Despite numerous promises from congressional Democrats, there are still 15.1 million Americans out of work,” said Ken Spain, NRCC spokesman. “After wasting taxpayer dollars to produce an unimpressive 397 jobs in Michigan, middle-class families are still asking one thing: Where are the jobs?”

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/63397-partial-stimulus-data-draw-gop-criticism-white-house-defense

Comments (17)

I have but one thing to say: "prove it". Prove that 30,000 jobs were saved due to 'your' intervention. These wingnuts can and will say anything, regardless how outlandish or false. One could write a bestseller entitled "The Book of Lies and Contradictions" and just take sound bytes of all the dichotomies in positions taken thus far. I started a written record back when Obama was running for President, and after 12 pages I got distracted by other things and fialed to follow-thru with it, but I sure hope someone is keeping these records.BY Savant Noir on 10/16/2009 at 00:10
Hey Savant Noir, the 30k jobs were the ones directly hired by the use of stimulas dollars. They require all contractors to detail the positions. So yes you can go and look it up on there website. Then you see exactly which jobs were created, exactly who hired them and for what project. I mean if you actually did any research.BY J on 10/16/2009 at 00:36
So, even if we take the best case scenario, 1.2 million jobs saved or created. That comes to $282,500 per job. What incredible failure.I'm sure when the audits finally start getting done, that none of that money will have found its way into a Congress-critter's pocket, aren't you?BY Disgusted on 10/16/2009 at 00:53
what a crock of $#! BY Unemployed on 10/16/2009 at 07:24
Failure is in the eye of the beholder. I'm sure that the 30K persons hired for those jobs would not consider it failure.Nor, would I think that those people whose 1.2 million jobs were saved would think it was a failure.BY wiseirishwoman on 10/16/2009 at 08:08
30K jobs from $16 Billion in wasteful spending is $533,000.00 PER JOB! Could this be more outrageous? We were all badly lied to,BY jsixpack on 10/16/2009 at 08:40
WISEIRISHWOMAN, you probably did not like the 23 million jobs created without stimulus and without increasing the debt by Regan as a fantasy!BY William on 10/16/2009 at 08:52
1. Yes the jobs were probably created.2. We really need a more precise metric. Some of the jobs created were of less than one year duration. If the metric were 'job/years', the number created would likely be fewer than the 30k counted so far (probably about 10k to 15k).3. The longer term effects are very iffy. For those jobs where productive work is being done and public goods are being created (e.g., highway construction), it may be that long term job creation will take place (of course that would depend on whether the highway was actually needed). On the other hand where the work being done is just paperwork, no long term job creation takes place.4. Also, in the long term, the effect of the debt created will be to marginally raise interest rates (obviously that doesn't happen in the short term given the high unemployment). A marginal increase in interest rates marginally decreases employment.BY mhw on 10/16/2009 at 09:45
My welder husband was laid off a year ago along with the majority of employees. The company is still working only a skeleton crew and has not yet begun to rehire its employees back. This is a company that has thrived and supported several hundred employees and their families for many decades. I am disabled. My 20 year old son cannot find even a minimum wage job because the laid off skilled workers have taken them all he's joining the Army so he can eat. I'm happy for the 30,000 whose jobs were saved but I do not see that as an indication that the economy is recovering. We were middle class but went on assistance when the savings and unemployment ran out. We have 4 teens (13-15) still at home and our food stamps are $250 a month which represents a recent 30% decrease presumably because so many more people are needing assistance now. My husband has gone to college to get a BS degree (incurring debt) hoping that will help him get work but I keep hearing even from even the well educated people that they are stressed in their hunt for a job. Since we lost the health insurance with my husband's job his teeth are hurting badly but we can't even afford an exam and Medicaid doesn't pay for adult dental. I'm fortunate to be an American and times are hard on many right now - I'm still hopeful that someone will figure out the answer to bring us out of recession. I am learning how to survive and care for my kids on much less and now I can see how wasteful we once were when we had money to spare.BY Irascible Wench on 10/16/2009 at 10:06
I sent a comment well over an hour ago…why have you not posted it? It was very imformative. You tend to do this a lot.BY fran on 10/16/2009 at 10:16

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.