THE HILL
 

Group pushing for Guantanamo closure, prisoner transfers

By Susan Crabtree - 10/18/09 06:45 PM ET

Several retired generals will join forces with war critics this week to support President Barack Obama’s commitment to transfer Guantanamo Bay terror suspects to the U.S. for trial.

The generals, who will remain anonymous until the campaign is formally announced Tuesday, are joining forces with VoteVets’ Jon Soltz and former Rep. Tom Andrews (D-Maine) to urge Congress to shutter the Guantanamo prison. Andrews is the director of National Campaign to Close Guantanamo.

The group plans to launch a national TV ad campaign aimed at pressuring members of Congress to support Obama’s pledge to shutter the tarnished detention facility.

The campaign comes in the wake of the defeat of a GOP-led effort in the House to block the transfer of any Guantanamo Bay detainee to U.S. soil – even for prosecution. The House voted 224-193 to allow detainees to be moved to the U.S. for trial. It came on an amendment to the $42.8 billion Homeland Security spending bill. The overall bill passed 307-114 and now moves to the Senate, where swift passage is expected.

“It was good to see that there is hope in the House on the issue,” Andrews told The Hill Friday. “…This was a good step forward but we have many, many steps to go before we can overcome this Republican opposition.”

Obama is trying to meet a self-imposed deadline for closing Gitmo by Jan. 22, 2010, but senior administration officials have readily conceded that the detention facility will remain open after that deadline passes because of the thorny and unexpected legal circumstances surrounding its closure.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) is planning another attempt to block the transfer of a subset of the detainees: anyone accused of plotting the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

An amendment he plans to offer to the appropriations bill funding the Justice Department would prohibit the use of funds for trying in U.S. civilian courts anyone involved in the attack on New York’s twin towers. It would affect about a half-dozen suspects who are accused of being involved in planning the attacks.

Graham and others want the suspects tried instead in a military commission at Gitmo, arguing that civilian courts are ill-equipped for such high-stakes trials involving potential security secrets.

Graham has said that defeating his amendment would force a “fundamental shift in national security policy” by criminalizing war suspects and possibly jeopardizing their prosecution.

“It would be a major strategic mistake to take the mastermind of 9/11 and put him in a federal court,” Graham has said, referring to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. “It would be a zoo.”

Democrats are expected to back the administration and defeat the amendment. Obama’s supporters have said U.S. officials need flexibility in prosecution decisions.

“Why should we preclude any forum where they can be successfully tried and held accountable?" Majority Whip Dick Durbin told The Hill earlier this week. “We rely on civilian courts every day for the security of Americans in our neighborhoods and homes, and I am not going to draw a conclusion that the Department of Justice should not be part of this conversation. I want them tried in a court where they are most likely to be prosecuted.”

Andrews said his campaign is aimed at encouraging more supporters in Congress to speak out and support the president on the politically sensitive issue.

“It’s extremely important for the Senate and the House to stand up and join this debate and to lay down the fundamental case for turning the page and respecting the Constitution of the United States and the basic values of this country and allow our judicial process to do what it has done very, very well,” he said. “The assault on this reform is going to continue in many forms. The Democrats and those who support this reform and support the Constitution need to stand up and defend it.”

Republicans quickly seized on the latest House vote on Gitmo to hammer Democrats who voted against it. The National Republican Congressional Committee sent out releases slamming candidates in 50 districts for giving the Obama administration permission to transfer Gitmo detainees to U.S. soil.

“The Democrats’ current plans roll out the welcome mat for Gitmo detainees with provisions temporarily allowing the administration to try the prisoners in U.S. courts,” the release stated.

Republicans cited a June Gallup poll showing that Americans oppose plans to move Gitmo detainees to the U.S. by a 4 to 1 margin.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/63609-group-pushing-for-gitmo-closure

Comments (7)

"Republicans cited a June Gallup poll showing that Americans oppose plans to move Gitmo detainees to the U.S. by a 4 to 1 margin." Of course, what they don't cite is that it is motivated by fear. They've frightened people to the point of craziness. Listen, if there's one thing the American populace is good at…it's imprisoning folks. Name one break in at a Supermax or any other federal facility. I dare you.BY Chris A. on 10/18/2009 at 20:50
I say keep these TERRORISTS off our soil I can just see some civil liberties lawyer getting one of them off and them getting to be released here. Lovely thought indeed.BY danceswithtrees on 10/18/2009 at 21:16
These are 'war criminals'. They are not 'common criminals'. They do not belong in the criminal justice system. They were not picked up by the cops for murder, larceny, forging bad checks, and the like. In complete violation of all civil law and the Laws of War and the Geneva Conventions they deliberately targeted innocent civilians of all religions, men, women, children, and they did it by camouflaging themselves as civilians. They did it in the name of Allah in the service of Jihad i transnational terror. They are proud of their dastardly inhumane behavior. That behavior merits trial in a military setting. We ask our soldiers, marines, sailors, and airmen to fight by military standards and to abide by conventions governing warfare. Just because the enemy broke all those standards is no reason to try them as civilian defendants. It is all the more reason they belong in a military court, By placing them in a civilian court setting we will be encouraging out-of-uniform combat activity, which is the most dangerous kind for civilians, and which the Laws of War and the Geneva Conventions were passed to prevent. Somebody tell Obama and Holder we have lost faith in them. It is well past time for Holder to be fired and replaced at Justice as in the best interest of the country.BY graham on 10/18/2009 at 22:21
Gee that probably isn't Senator Graham's post above mine as it makes far to much sense. The conservatives I know have come to think that Senator Graham is picking his stance on issues by flipping a coin.BY Patrick Michael on 10/18/2009 at 23:20
Chris A.., Ummmm Chris, do you think that if we republicans had the power to scare Americans at a 4 to 1 ratio on an issue that we would have stopped at Gitmo?BY Patrick Michael on 10/18/2009 at 23:21
Yo, danceswithtrees . The detainees are not "war criminals" - they have not been convicted. At this point, those that have even been officially charged with crimes are suspects at most. It's that little thing called "guilty until proven innocent" democracies espouse.And what about you? Are you proud of (our) dastardly inhumane behavior. Talk about war crimes - illegal invasions and occupations, murder of 100,000 civilians, renditions, torture. Talk about war crimes.Obviously you cannot see the forest for those trees you are dancing with.BY chrisO on 10/19/2009 at 18:03
I see numerous news reports and websites saying that "several retired generals" support the closing of Gitmo. So do I, but I cannot find the list of the generals anywhere. Any ideas where such a list might be?BY Buddy on 10/23/2009 at 13:01

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.