THE HILL
 

OMB director warns growing deficit a threat to American economy

By Walter Alarkon - 11/03/09 12:51 PM ET

White House Budget Director Peter Orszag warned Tuesday that large federal deficits will eventually imperil the U.S. economy because they will lead to higher interest rates and more borrowing from overseas.

Orszag, in a speech in New York, said that deficits, expected to add $9 trillion to the current national debt of $12 trillion over the next decade, are "serious and ultimately unsustainable."

Orszag said that deficit spending was necessary to help boost the economy when unemployment is hovering around 10 percent. But he said that red ink must be stopped as the economy recovers. During a recovery, private investment will again pick up and compete with the federal government for capital.

"It is at this point that we are likely to observe a rise in interest rates, an increase in borrowing from abroad, or some combination thereof due to the deficits," Orszag said. "And it is at that point that deficits will be putting the health of our economy in jeopardy rather than helping to mitigate the most severe economic downturn in more than 50 years, as they are now."

Orszag said President Barack Obama's administration is looking at proposals to rein in deficits as it works on its fiscal 2011 budget request, to be released in February. Orszag, however, did not specify what the proposals were. He repeated the White House's vow to cut the deficit it inherited in half by the end of Obama's first term.

Orszag blamed the expected growth in debt on the recession and the economic policies of former President George W. Bush's administration. Orszag said $5 trillion of the expected $9 trillion in red ink over the next 10 years is the result of tax cuts and the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit. Obama has proposed extending the tax cuts for Americans making less than $200,000 but allowing the cuts for wealthier Americans to expire.

The rest of the deficit spending stems from about $3.5 billion in increased spending on programs aimed at providing recession relief, including unemployment insurance and food stamps, and because of the $787 billion stimulus.

"All told, the entire $9 trillion deficit reflects the failure to pay for policies in the past and the cost of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression and the steps we had to take to combat it," Orszag said.

Democratic senators have begun to raise concerns about deficit spending. Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.), eight other Senate Democrats and one independent called on Senate leadership to consider a special legislative process to produce a package of fiscal recovery reforms. Bayh said that the special process should be considered during debate over an increase in the $12.1 trillion debt limit, which must be approved by the upper chamber within weeks.

Republicans used the growth of deficits to attack Democrats and the Obama administration as being fiscally irresponsible. They have also pointed to the rise in unemployment this year as evidence that stimulus spending isn't working.

Orszag on Tuesday credited the stimulus with helping break the "potential vicious recessionary cycle" that the economy faced as it began to contract. He also said that the stimulus was responsible for virtually all of the 3.5 percent annualized economic growth in the third quarter of this year.

He noted a recovery in jobs is expected to lag behind GDP growth.

"The typical progression in a recovery is first an increase in productivity, then an increase in hours worked, and finally, the hiring of additional workers by firms," Orszag said. "We are somewhere between the first and second stages of this process."


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/66085-omb-director-warns-growing-deficit-a-threat-to-us-economy

Comments (13)

The words "pot," "kettle" and "black" come to mind.BY Larry Darrell on 11/03/2009 at 13:44
Great article, puts things in some perspective.BY politics4me on 11/03/2009 at 16:12
With the increasing control being exerted by this Administration and Congress I question if private investment is going to be willing to take on risk. If aditional taxes are a vehicle to reduce the deficit, the return on investment will be reduced by investing in this countries economy and smart money will flow to the areas that provide the highest after tax return. This Administration is simply barking up the counterproducti ve tree.BY jadedfellow on 11/03/2009 at 16:19
If how Oregon utilized it's stimulus is an indication of how other states are applying the funds the stimulus will indeed be a failure of epic portions. Oregon used 80ish% of the funds to grow government services. This does not stimulate growth in the private sector. We are following Japan's governement catastrophy model after their economy crashed.BY jadedfellow on 11/03/2009 at 16:31
Jadefellow - private investment will come back…the highest tax rate is 36%…if it goes to 39%, that will be what it was in the 1990's when the Republican congress and the Democratic white house raised taxes, cut spending, and ballanced the budget…4 times. The increased tax rates in 1994 did not prevent the dot com, telecommunicati ons, and internet revolution from occurring. People like to make money. If I have a chance to make an extra $100,000, whether the government steals 36% or 39% doesn't affect whether or not I try to make that $100,000. Yes it is less money I have to invest, but it is also money that can be used to prevent the government from borrowing, which means that private investment won't be competing with government for capital, which means interest rates will remain lower, which means it is cheaper for me to invest to make that $100,000…One big circle. As far as the stimulus package…I read this weekend. Not what I expected to see out of the right leaning Wall Street Journal: http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB125686010435717399-lMyQjAxMDI5NTM2MDgzNjAwWj.htmlBY DJH on 11/03/2009 at 17:19
So the administrations solution is to keep spending money like drunken fools. As I said earlier they will bankrupt this nation along with its citizens..Once again they blame previous administration, this is old and people will not put up with this bulls@@t forever..BY bailedout on 11/03/2009 at 17:19
So deregulation under Slick Willie had nothing to do with it, or the greedy mortgage people that knew the subprime lending was going to implode but sold as many as they could to make as much as possible before it did, or the libs and obama sueing banks for not giving enough of these crappy loans had nothing to do with it only Bush's policies put us in this mess. What about the accounting practices that were outlawed under Bush, the Enron type of accounting that everybody on wall street used to cook their books for wall street, maybe just maybe all of those made up profits have finally come home to roost. Nobody wants to take ownership of it and I'm sure not just one administration caused or contributed to it, but I am sick and tired of this sickly weak administration we currently have blaming everything on the past president, I cannot remember one time during Bush's presidency did he blame Clinton for America's problems and there are many he could of cited.These 10 year budget projections have to go thaey are all Bull crap especially the balanced budgets of slick willie, these guys will not have control of the spending for ten years so why can they use the latter years to pay back all of their spending in theory when we all know somebody else is going to come in and change the way the money is spent. This has been going on for years and has gotten worse over time and will never change until we outlaw deficit spending. I own a small business and cant spend money I dont have so the government should not be able to either. (what's good for the goose is good for the gander)BY Matt on 11/03/2009 at 17:20
a little food for thought: congress just passed a 680 billion dollar defense authorization bill. That is $680 for 1 year!!!! That is 6.8 Trillion over 10 years…why did we hear nothing about this. Everyone worries about the spending but never highlights this line item. That is only 100 billion less than the "stimulus." I guess pork projects for defense contractors are ok…but pork projects for asphalt contractors are a bad idea. The defense bill is almost 9 times the size of the proposed health bills and over 10 times the size of the $62 billion spent on education. I guess bullets and bombs are better than healthy citizens and an educated public.BY dave13 on 11/03/2009 at 17:36
The first duty of government is to protect the nation,or if you are talking about local government, to protect the lives and property of its citizens. I want government to protect us. If there is money left over we can debate the other choices,.BY Howard McCarthy on 11/03/2009 at 19:23
You thinkWow what an amazing comment…What took them so long to figure that outIt is basic math 101…10 dollars in qnd 20 dollars out…you are in over your head…Their solution was to spend more…well now that hasnt worked in the past…not in the USA or for taht matter anyplace…BY brew on 11/04/2009 at 11:36

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.