THE HILL
 

Obama, Medvedev making 'progress' on new nuclear treaty

By Sam Youngman - 11/15/09 03:03 PM ET

President Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said over the weekend that they are making progress toward a new nuclear nonproliferation treaty, but White House officials said there will not be a new treaty before the existing one expires on Dec. 5.

Obama and Medvedev, meeting in Singapore, said they are getting close to a deal that would have to be ratified through the Senate and the Russian Duma.

"Our goal continues to be to complete the negotiations and to be able to sign a deal before the end of the year," Obama said. "And I'm confident that if we work hard and with a sense of urgency about it that we should be able to get that done."

Administration officials said it is impossible to get a treaty ratified and in place before the existing START treaty ends, but they said the plan is to come to an agreement on a bridging agreement that would keep in place the central aspects of the START treaty until a new one can be completed.

Mike McFaul, the National Security Council senior director for Russia, told reporters that he does think that bridging agreement will be put in place before Dec. 5, and the two countries are making progress on the overall treaty.

"But we're not at the endgame yet, we're not at the end of the year," McFaul said. "We still have some fairly major things to finish."

Obama and Medvedev also discussed the ongoing Iran situation, with Obama saying that "we are running out of time" for Iran to answer whether it will agree to export its uranium to Russia for enrichment. That proposal from the United Nations Security Council and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is viewed by some as a compromise that would help prevent Iran from developing a nuclear bomb.

"Unfortunately, so far at least Iran appears to have been unable to say yes to what everyone acknowledges is a creative and constructive approach," Obama said.

Medvedev said that despite frustrations from both countries, "this process did not stop, did not become a stumbling stone which is impossible to bypass."

"It is still under way. But nonetheless, we're still not satisfied with the pace of advancement of the process," Medvedev said.

Obama traveled to China over the weekend, where he will remain for three days.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/67829-obama-medvedev-making-progress-on-new-nuclear-nonproliferation-treaty

Comments (6)

Dear Obama, quit giving away our superiority around the world and making us meek. After you and Congress are swept out of office, it'll take the next President decades to repair what you have messed up!!!BY Dear Hussein on 11/15/2009 at 17:28
Whoooah there nelly—- er… "Dear Hussein"… Y'overshot it a bit. Reel it back in by about 1 Presidency, and then you'll have the sentiment about right.BY Honest Abe on 11/15/2009 at 18:13
Honest Abe,Try taking an honest look at strategic reality. The Russians are modernizing their nuclear force structure, while the U.S. nuclear weapons are aging, with no replacements in sight.The agreement being negotiated will NOT affect Russian nuclear force structure, because the Russians are already planning to deploy fewer missiles but with MORE nuclear warheads on them—something deemed inherently destabilizing by multitudes of arms control enthusiasts for decades!Meanwhi le, the agreement will likely require the U.S. to spend money to eliminate missiles prematurely. Aging missiles means less reliability. Fewer missiles means fewer targets for the new Russian systems. That combination is inherently destabilizing.So Abe, you're either being dishonest or obtuse. Remember, absence a credible nuclear deterrent, debates about the Middle East are irrelevant.BY Mr. Schnelling on 11/15/2009 at 19:33
My motto —- "Speak softly and carry a big stick." Too bad Obama's giving away all our sticks. Pretty soon our country will be bankrupt and will be the weak country the libs wants us to be (you know, like their slave voting block waiting for their entitlements) —- but at least we'll be green…BY TEDDY ROOSEVELT on 11/15/2009 at 22:08
This is the standard "Look like you are doing something" while repeating ,repeating the 50 year mantra "The world needs us to DISarm our Nuclear Capacity" When are people going to see the almost yearly propaganda game as being what it is? ALL parties talk in order to raise interest and divert attention from real problem solving.The Idea that survival from a exchange of 300 -1000 nuclear warheads going off in and around the world in order to settle greivances of political /material nature is shear Idiocy! [They KNOW This] This is Yearly Posturing for Defence budgets and diverting the media.Folks, this agenda gets votes .period!BY J.MC. on 11/16/2009 at 16:12
Mr. Schnelling—-I'm neither willingly obtuse nor dishonest—-Last I recall hearing about Russian nuclear superiority, it was with Lugar's legislation attempting to control the black-market superfluence of old Russian missiles. Despite the petro-oligarchy, is Russia in ANY sort of economic condition to modernize ANYthing? Let alone their nuclear capabilities? I'm in whole-hearted agreement with you concerning the panultimate hazard of a nuclear-enabled Middle East— but would argue that Russia's reluctant Security Council vote is a prime factor in that consideration.BY Honest Abe on 11/17/2009 at 11:47

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.