THE HILL
 

Republicans seize on flaws found by GAO in stimulus jobs data

By Walter Alarkon - 11/19/09 12:29 PM ET

Republicans used new information about reporting errors in how the stimulus funds were spent to continue their criticism of the $787 billion economic package.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) told House members Thursday that administration data suggesting the stimulus directly created more than 640,000 jobs contained flaws and that the methods used to track stimulus money need to be improved.

The GAO called for a closer look at a quarter of the 57,000 reports filed. About 4,000 of the reports from state governments, companies and other stimulus recipients showed that their stimulus projects saved or created jobs with no money being received or spent. Another 9,247 reports showed money received or spent but didn’t show any jobs saved or created.

“Funds are being used for appropriate purposes, but the question remains: How many jobs are being created?” said Gene Dodaro, acting comptroller general and head of the GAO, at a House Oversight and Government Reform hearing Thursday.

Other news reports have found stimulus data that suggest jobs were saved or created in congressional districts that don’t exist, such as the 99th district of California. A Wall Street Journal analysis said that the direct stimulus jobs tally, touted by Vice President Joe Biden as evidence that the package was working, was overstated by at least 20,000 jobs, due to reporting mistakes by recipients.

Rep. Darrell Issa (Calif.), the senior Republican on the Oversight Committee, said the stimulus data was “misleading” and accused the Obama administration of peddling “propaganda.”

“The fact is, they have no idea how many jobs have been saved or created,” Issa said.

Earl Devaney, head of the administration panel responsible for tracking the stimulus funds, acknowledged that flaws in the reports were an “embarrassment.” But he said he wasn’t surprised by the mistakes, arguing that they were an inevitable part of the administration’s effort to be as transparent as possible.

“It’s harder to practice transparency than it is to talk about transparency,” Devaney told the House panel. “It is definitely not something for the faint of heart.”

Democrats haven’t given up on the first stimulus. The White House pointed out that its estimates that the stimulus has created or saved approximately 1 million jobs through September is roughly equal to independent estimates by Moody’s and the Congressional Budget Office.

Unlike the hard count of 640,329 jobs released last month, the higher estimates are based on macroeconomic data that includes the indirect job-creation effects of tax cuts and spending.

Other Democrats on the Oversight panel noted that less than a quarter of the stimulus has been spent so far.

The committee’s chairman, Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.), told The Hill that errors in the reporting should be corrected immediately, but he argued that the economy would be worse if not for the $787 billion package.

He noted that the economy grew in the third quarter for the first time since 2007, and that the jobless rate, which has risen to a 26-year high of 10.2 percent, typically lags behind GDP growth.

Still, Towns and other Democrats called for further legislation to create jobs.

Democratic leadership in both chambers have signaled that they plan to take up new jobs-creation legislation, and a bipartisan group of 161 House members calling themselves the Congressional Jobs Now Caucus plan to hash out new jobs proposals. The caucus is led by Reps. Bobby Rush (D-Ill.), Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio) and Candice MIller (R-Mich.).Rep. Diane Watson (D-Calif.), a member of the Jobs Now Caucus, said that new measures need to be focused on jobs alone.

“I think we have to do a better job of directing that money to job creation and not to a bureaucracy,” Watson told The Hill. “Starting in the new year, it has to be jobs, jobs, jobs.”

This story was updated at 9:55 p.m.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/68623-gao-finds-more-errors-in-stimulus-data

Comments (7)

you have to swear under penalty of perjury when you fill out your driver's license application, i would hope a similar pledge would have to be signed when you are reporting back to the government when you account for the money they gave you and whether you actually created any jobs with it.its an outrage if thats not the case.BY johnboy on 11/19/2009 at 13:20
How can you report correct figures when the ones received the monies are not completing the reports correctly. You report what you receive. These congressmen are getting more radical as this administration goes on. They keep talking about saving our young people, when you look at whats going on, what poor examples. It is very sickening to see some of the things going on. Let us as American get together and support our president, it is okay to disagree, but do it in good taste. I have always supported my candidate and respected the others candidates if mine lost. Always voted for the best one, but they all had one thing in common, they were white and that did not matter. I do believe because our president is a very intellectual person and most damaging of all is that he has some black in him, is why all of these crazy things are going on. Let us pray for this America, when certain groups believe they are the chosen ones and everyone is beneath the chosen ones.BY vivban on 11/19/2009 at 14:11
We had a better 3rd quarter because of cash for clunkers…more money thrown into the mix to make the numbers looks good. Let's see what the 4th quarter brings…bet it goes down again.BY georgie girl on 11/19/2009 at 17:32
Earl Devaney, head of the Obama administration panel reviewing stimulus reporting, acknowledged that flaws in the reports were an "embarrassment." But he said he wasn't surprised by the mistakes, arguing that they were an inevitable part of the administration's effort to be as transparent as possible about how the $787 billion stimulus was spent."It's harder to practice transparency than it is to talk about transparency," Devaney told the House panel. "It is definitely not something for the faint of heart."WHAT IS THIS BS??So mistakes and transparency go hand in hand? Transparency is not for the "faint of heart", Is it so difficult for these people to just report the TRUTH?I really cannot believe these statements.BY Paul Trood on 11/19/2009 at 17:51
"Devaney called on Congress to impose penalties on stimulus recipients who failed to report any data."I call on Congress to impose penalties on the idiots who negligently fail to perform their legal responsibility for the proper administration and monitoring of stimulus funds that are provided to recipients.And I also call on Congress to require that those idiots swear under penalty of perjury that all information posted on the White House is actually accurate and complete.It appears that this program is being run by fools who equate incompetence with "impressive" performance, and whose highest priority is misleading the public at any costs —- to include spending $18 million taxpayer dollars to upgrade their worthless website to make it even more worthless and misleading.BY TaxedRUs on 11/19/2009 at 21:48
We would be wiser to keep our tax monies next April 15th then to funnel it to Washington for them to keep ripping us off thru this anti-stimulus anti-recovery scam!BY Ula Maxie on 11/20/2009 at 01:47
TAXEDRUS - Please include in your list, all statements made regarding Health Care including death panels and rationed care BY BOTH PARTIES.As to the reporting of progress under the stimulas funds - they (OMB) are reporting what was reported to them.They (OMB) also changed how and what will be reported at least three times - can you blame the reporters for getting confused?BY Lee Spencer on 11/20/2009 at 09:46

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.