THE HILL
 

White House official laments healthcare bill obscuring climate push

By Sam Youngman - 11/23/09 11:27 AM ET

A senior Obama administration official lamented Monday that Capitol Hill has been dominated by the healthcare debate.

A senior Obama administration official lamented Monday that even as the president has made climate change a priority, Capitol Hill has been dominated by the healthcare debate.

"We would have obviously preferred that healthcare would've been finished a long time ago, and we would be in an energy debate, but that didn't happen," the official said.

The comment, made by an official in a background briefing for reporters, comes amid a wave of international criticism that the U.S. has disengaged on climate change. The president has said several times over the past few months that his top domestic priority is healthcare reform legislation and has yet to make a final decision as to whether he will even attend next month's United Nations Summit in Copenhagen, Denmark.

White House officials said they were pleased that the House has passed a bill and a Senate committee has also passed bills, but foreign leaders have questioned how much the U.S. can commit to an agreement without Congress making substantially more progress.

"It would be a mistake to conclude that the lack of a treaty in December was because the legislation didn't pass," one official said.

Officials noted that the "Senate is busy," but they said senior White House aides have met with more than 24 senators to work toward the bill.

When asked for a timeline on climate change legislation in the Senate, one official noted with a joke that Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said he hoped to begin debate in the spring.

"The good news is spring is coming earlier and earlier in light of climate change," the official said.

Officials noted that as they prepare for the Copenhagen summit, they would need to submit target numbers for greenhouse gas emissions that are "consistent with the legislative process."

One official said the White House would make a submission, possibly a specific number, but they want to ensure that it "doesn't get ahead of or [isn’t] at odds with" what Congress is considering.

One administration official said the discussion on Capitol Hill has changed dramatically in the last six to eight weeks, and the White House sees hope for legislation.

"Most members are saying 'when' we get a bill, as opposed to 'if' we get a bill," the official said.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/69119-white-house-official-laments-healthcare-debate-obscuring-climate-change-

Comments (10)

When Ambassador Todd Stern took the reins for Climate Change policy and treaty negotiations, he made it very plain that the Administration would take its lead from congressionally enacted climate change and energy legislation. He went so far as to say he would not advance proposals internationally unless they were politically acceptable in Congress. Congress is holding up the treaty negotiations.BY Dr. Rudolph Ryser on 11/23/2009 at 12:31
The UN can't wait to get their grubby hands on tax dollars generated by a fairy tale myth. The only "climate warming" taking place is in the pant seats of incumbents up for re-election in Senate and Congress. Will they be willing to nail the finale death nail into our economy just to please the democrat party?BY Mon on 11/23/2009 at 13:49
This new religion and former science (climatology) is a scam. Most of the believers (climatolojists ) will argue that crazy people like me refuse to acknowledge the facts and data on global warming. Well, as to the question of weather or not the Earth is getting warmer, it is. Now here is where people like me and climatolojists differ. A scientific mind must be very careful to separate correlation and causation. Just because two events happen at the same time does not mean that they are linked in any way. Scientists have done much research on the subject. It seams that governments around the world repress any scientific facts that are contrary to this new fascism. Fact = all other planets are also warming at same rate as Earth. The EPA's own report was suppressed by the current administration in June 09 because it did not reflect current policies, Google it, I dare you to think for yourself. To understand why climatolojy is so insidious, you only need ask, who benifits? Lets just prepare to live in a warmer world for a while.BY tim on 11/23/2009 at 13:58
AGW is a HOAX and nothing more than yet another excuse for our current President to prostrate himself before "his" people, as he hands over an endless stream of AMERICAN Taxpayer dollars to his fellow "citizens of the world", at the expense of those who elected him to serve OUR interests first, and foremost. Just as the American People are waking up to what Obamacare REALLY means, what it will REALLY cost us, (both financially and otherwise), People all over the GLOBE are waking up to the FACT that they've been HAD when it comes to Anthropogenic Global Warming. The current Administration will not stop until they have reduced the United States to a third world country, all in furtherance of their plan for "social equality". I don't know about YOU, but I have NO DESIRE to be "socially equal" to India or Mexico.BY Dusan on 11/23/2009 at 14:31
Government run auto, banking, health care and now energy. That's right continue killing jobs and make the citizens of the U.S. dependent on government handouts.BY bailedout on 11/23/2009 at 17:52
LOL…Let's see the liars, cheats and thieves try to explain away their OWN hacked emails over the weekend, in which the ADMIT that they're "fudging" the numbers, and making up "facts" as they go along regarding "Climate Change". HATS OFF to the genius who hacked into their system and posted their emails, admitting their FRAUD, on the Internet for the WHOLE WORLD to see! Google it, folks! It's ALL been a lie! ALL OF IT! AHAHAHAHA!BY Dusan on 11/23/2009 at 19:00
Most recent reports are showing that the costs of doing nothing are higher than the cost of taking action to reduce CO2 emissions.The Global Carbon Project is the most recent report, that concludes that unless emissions are substantially reduced, the result would be a rise in average global temperature by nearly 10 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of the century. That is on par with previous worst-case scenarios outlined by the United Nations Intergovernment al Panel on Climate Change. Scientists have estimated that temperature spikes above 2 degrees could have disastrous consequences, including large rises in sea level, droughts and stronger storms. In another indication that global warming is accelerating, record minimum sea ice in the Arctic was reported last month. The Catlin Arctic Survey estimates that based on the dwindling expanse and thickness of ice coverage, the Arctic Ocean will become ice free in summer within two decades.Responsible Republicans like Senator McCain, Graham, and Lieberman (looks like a Republican) and many others say something must be done, the only disagreement is on what to do.BY D. G.  on 11/23/2009 at 19:12
D.G.: Anthropogenic Global Warming is a HOAX. A LIE. A SHAM dreamed up by the Progressives in order to "spread the wealth" not only from the rich PEOPLE to the poor people, but from the rich COUNTRIES to the poor countries. It's a lie. And the world is waking up to that fact. ALL of us. They can't pull the wool over our eyes much longer. They were exposed this weekend when someone pulled an inside job, hacked into their system, and posted their emails on-line. You're a SHEEP if you believe that "climate change" is man made.BY Dusan on 11/23/2009 at 22:28
D.G., NASA disagrees with you. The record low sea ice in the artic was in 2007 increased in 2008 and is higer than that in 2009. But take heart, in another 8 years or so the sun will go into another active cycle and we can watch the ice melt again. But look out, we could be in for another mini-ice age. CO2 isn't a large enough part of our atmosphere to effect any change, and the amount human activity alters that is laughably small.BY Scott on 11/24/2009 at 09:26
DG - So the "latest" computer models predict a 10 degree rise in temperature? Are these the same models that predicted the continuing rise in temperatures we are NOT experiencing? It is pure idiocy to buy into this sham when the very models being touted as proof of the future calamity cannot even predict climate for the last twenty years.BY Jon on 11/24/2009 at 11:03

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.