THE HILL
 

President to meet with lawmakers before war announcement

By Jared Allen, Mike Soraghan and Alexander Bolton - 11/25/09 12:40 PM ET

President Barack Obama will meet with House and Senate leaders from both parties next week before he announces his Afghanistan policy.

Several Congressional leadership aides have confirmed that Democratic and Republican leaders from both the House and Senate, as well as key committee chairman and ranking members, are scheduled to meet with Obama at the White House at 4:45 p.m. on Tuesday.
 

And Obama does not appear to be limiting invitations to those lawmakers at the top of the leadership ladders. Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and Republican Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.), the No. 2 Democrat and Republican in the House, are planning to attend, leadership aides said.
 
Lawmakers from a variety of committees, including each chamber's armed services and foreign relations panels, have also been invited.

Aides to Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Armed Services Committee Ranking member Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), and Foreign Relations Ranking member Sen. Dick Lugar (R-Ind.) have confirmed the lawmakers's attendance.
 
On Tuesday night, Obama is expected to make a primetime address to announce a significant troop buildup for the war in Afghanistan. The speech will take place at the West Point military academy, according to reports.
 
Many congressional Democrats could have trouble supporting additional troops.
 
“I don't think there's much support for sending more troops to Afghanistan in the country or in Congress,” Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told reporters two months ago.
 
But Obama could receive significant support from Republicans who have pressed him to send more troops to Afghanistan.
 
White House aides have already indicated to a number of media outlets that Obama will announce a troop buildup of as many as 30,000 U.S. soldiers.  There are currently 68,000 troops in Afghanistan.
 
General Stanley McChrystal, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan, has reportedly requested 40,000 additional troops.
 
McCain, Obama’s 2008 presidential rival, has urged Obama to make a decision quickly.
 
“I think you should give great weight to the recommendations of your military commanders. That's why they are in the position they're in. And I think that during this delay, unfortunately, we have made our allies question our steadfastness and our troops question whether we're doing it quickly enough,” McCain told Fox News Wednesday night.
 
At least one Congressional leader may already have gotten a preview of what the president will call for.
 
On Tuesday afternoon, Pelosi met with Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and senior White House advisors.
 
Pelosi aides refused to confirm that Afghanistan was discussed and they wouldn’t comment on the meeting’s topics.
 
But shortly before his meeting with Pelosi, Obama made the most declarative statement about the eight-year-old war that he has in months, and hinted at his decision to send a significant number of additional troops, when he said: “My intention is to finish the job.”



Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/69471-obama-to-meet-with-lawmakers-before-afghanistan-announcement

Comments (12)

I FIND IT VERY DISTURBING THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA DID NOT SPEAK WITH MCCRYSTAL FOR 90 DAYS AND WHEN MCCRYSTAL alertED US TO THIS INFORMATION, OBAMA "GAGGED" HIM.THEN HE SPENT MONTHS GETTING INFORMATION TO MAKE A DECISION, YET HE HIRED MCCRYSTAL.THIS MAN IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMANDER IN CHIEF. HOW MANY MONTHS WOULD IT TAKE HIM TO MAKE A DECISION IN AN EMERGENCY? HOW CAN COMMANDERS, SOLDIERS OR CITIZENS TAKE HIM SERIOUSLY EXCEPT AS A GREAT CAMPAIGNER AND MOTIVATIONAL SPEAKER?THE REPUBLICIANS NEED TO GET BACK TO BASICS AND IF THEY WIN IN 2010 OR 2012, IT IS NOT BUSINESS AS USUAL. THEIR DECISIONS TO DO OR NOT TO DO IN ALL AREAS INFLUENCED GREATLY OBAMA GETTING IN.BY SUE on 11/25/2009 at 13:26
When are they going to tell the public that they are goinng to impose taxes on the poeple to pay for the expenses of the war? They are calling it a, "war tax"?BY Palmieri on 11/25/2009 at 13:35
I am a Vietnam veteran and a strong supporter of President Obama, but his actions and vague rationalization about "finishing the job," sounds very much like President Bush. Until Obama defines what he means by "finishing the job," he will not receive my support or the support of any veterans who value the lives of our sons and daughters in uniform more than vague hopes of some illusive political gain. Our soldiers, their families, and our country deserve better than to have yet another president think he can overcome the bitter lessons of history and impose Western democratic ideals on an unwilling nation; that he can win the hearts and minds of a populace by supporting a corrupt government and using our patriotic soldiers as enforcers for that government, or that he can subdue his enemy without injuring our nation.However, he has not announced his intentions, so perhaps the skies will open and a light from above will shine on him as he announces an end to the fighting. Maybe he will announce that the Afghanis must set up their own government without our troops shedding their blood in the process. Maybe, just maybe, this could happen… But I doubt it.BY Timothy Caldwell on 11/25/2009 at 13:50
Unlike Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld, Obama realizes that his decisions as President will risk the lives of American soldiers.The problem in Afghanistan is one Obama has inherited from the mistakes of Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld who have LOST the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan once already.That is why he is not rushing to a decision or lying about the reason for his decision like Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld did.Strangely enough, the critics of Obama tend to be the same gullible fools who trusted Bush.I don't trust the critics.BY Jym Allyn on 11/25/2009 at 14:00
The President is walking into a trap. He should have realized that from the content and tone of Mc.Crystal's report. "the Taliban is winning and may still win after the 40.000" That is giving aid and comfort to the enemy or trying to warn Obama of the trap. I have my opinion on that but the fact is that to lure Obama into a Patriotic call of handing the US a needed victory where no one succeeded before is a bit naive. The fact is that the Taliban is, by tradition, a WARRIOR. Historically warriors never loose, they die first. Obama would have to kill every one of them if he insist on a call to battle. Furthermore, Mc.Crystal suggestion to send our forces to villages to protect the people is insane, our presence is an invitation for the Taliban to destroy the village. Surely someone remembers the Vietnam underground trails. What are they trying to do, win in 2012, of course who cares how many people die—-wake up Obama, send in the Army Corp of Engineer the people will fight for what is good for them, and keep our guys out of those villages they have tribal Chief and know how to fight, send in the air force bombers and fighter and our spy surveillance planes. There are many option beside that stupid Vietnam revival. Must of all question the motives of your political opposition and ask yourself if that is what you want—-constant war to maintain a colonial domain.BY Erica Stuart on 11/25/2009 at 14:57
Boy…I have never heard more B.S. in my life than from the previous posters. If you voted for him,YOU are part of the problem. What a mess you have us in.ThanksBY Larry on 11/25/2009 at 16:02
This has to be the saddest holiday season of my life. Please do not escalate any wars. We cannot win these wars. We have to find some other way to defeat the terrorists. Actually, they have already won. We are all suffering here.BY Whatawonderfulworld on 11/25/2009 at 17:59
I 'm with you Erica, the 1st couple of posters are living in a altered state of consciousness. The 1st poster did make a good point that Obama sounds like GWB. Not only does he have the same sound bytes, he has the same actions…which actions most certainly speak louder than mere words. G.W.Obama will continue what Bush didn't finish. Afghans want us out of their country and I donot blame them. We are there to watch the safety of the pipeline and the process of the poppies. Our soldiers should not die for such an abominable cause.BY Kate on 11/25/2009 at 23:06
All's fair in Love and War" and it's about time we made it a War and bombed the [***] out of them instead of chasing from building to building. With a few 500 punders and lots of air strikes it would be all over.Then burn and destroy the Poppie fields so they can grown another product that is not sent to many countries towdestroy the Children of those countires. I saw in Nam the excuses that led to our demise there. It's time to teach them a lesson not soon forgotten..just like Patton did and Harry. It saves lifes and keeps down the cost. we wil rebuild any way and we already built the most expensive Consulated ever in Iraq 6Billion! Should we let the Talaban take it over or even the Iraq's. Think not.BY jack stuart on 11/25/2009 at 23:52
You say my message, comment's, won't be published. "Please enter your name" what the [***] do you think my name is other than what I enter. Get with it or give it up!!jack stuartscrumpyja ck1@gmail.comBY jack stuart on 11/25/2009 at 23:54

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.