Hillary ClintonHillary Rodham ClintonOvernight Healthcare: Burwell huddles with Dems on fighting ObamaCare repeal Overnight Finance: House passes spending bill as shutdown looms | Fate in Senate unclear | Labor groups pan Trump's Labor pick Reid: Bring back the earmarks MORE is taking a new tack to boost her image in the Democratic presidential campaign.
Clinton acknowledged during Wednesday’s Democratic debate that she was “not a natural politician” and expanded on the theme in an interview with the SiriusXM radio show “The Mayor” the following day.
Few objective observers view such comments as spontaneous moments of candor. Rather, they see them as part of a strategy to warm up perceptions of the Democratic front-runner, who is seen suffering an enthusiasm deficit by comparison with her rival Bernie SandersBernie SandersSenate sends annual defense bill to Obama's desk AFL-CIO endorses Ellison for DNC chair Bernie Sanders is Democrats' person of the year MORE.
“It’s an attempt — maybe successful — to get people to see her less as a politician and as more of a personality,” said Hank Sheinkopf, a New York-based Democratic strategist who has worked for Clinton in the past but has no involvement in the current campaign. “She is attempting to remove herself from an elite class of people who tend to be disliked right now — professional politicians.”
Clinton has an uphill climb ahead if she is to freshen up her public image, however.
Polling shows that while voters respect her experience and toughness, many find her untrustworthy.
In a Washington Post/ABC News poll released on Wednesday, Clinton scored worse than Republicans Ted CruzTed CruzThe Hill's 12:30 Report Cruz defends Trump's Taiwan call Ark., Texas senators put cheese dip vs. queso to the test MORE and Marco RubioMarco Rubio House passes water bill with Flint aid, drought relief What the 2016 election can tell us about 2018 midterms Fight over water bill heats up in Senate MORE when respondents were asked to assess candidates' honesty and trustworthiness. She did, however, best Donald TrumpDonald TrumpTrump 'devils' burned in Guatemalan ceremony Trump meets with Ohio State victims Trump to remain Celebrity Apprentice's executive producer MORE on that question.
Despite her quarter-century on the national stage, there have been lingering questions about her authenticity. When she came to the brink of tears in New Hampshire during her 2008 battle with then-Sen. Barack ObamaBarack ObamaOvernight Tech: Wheeler's last ditch to get Rosenworcel confirmed | Microsoft finalizes LinkedIn deal | Copyright reform Brian Williams slams fake news Obama: I absolutely faced racism while in office MORE (D-Ill.), it was seen as a rare human moment.
Clinton supporters are also perplexed by resistance to her among young voters, including women. Exit polls from Michigan, where Sanders scored a shock win on Tuesday, showed Clinton losing voters between the ages of 18 and 44 by a 2-1 margin (65 percent to 32 percent).
Since the campaign began, Clinton aides have sought to generate more passion for her, particularly with younger voters. Clinton has appeared on late-night talk shows, sat down for a podcast with Lena Dunham and did an interview with Refinery 29, a website geared at 20-something women.
Still, although the Michigan exit poll did not break down the voting behavior of women from different age groups, it did show the former secretary of State losing unmarried women, who tend to be younger, by 7 points, while she won married women by 6 points.
The hope among some Democrats is that a clearer admission by Clinton of her weaknesses will serve to make her a more relatable figure.
“I hope to hear more of this kind of talk from her in the future,” said Jim Manley, a former aide to Senate Minority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidOvernight Tech: Wheeler's last ditch to get Rosenworcel confirmed | Microsoft finalizes LinkedIn deal | Copyright reform Reid: Bring back the earmarks Clinton blasts 'epidemic' of fake news MORE (D-Nev.) “I think it’s an acknowledgement, and it not only helps to humanize her, but it explains to people who she is and what she wants to do.”
Manley also noted, as do many experts, that Hillary Clinton has constantly suffered by comparison with her husband, who is widely considered one of the most gifted campaigners of the modern era.
“She’s not her husband,” Manley said. “Anyone would pale in comparison to her husband’s skills as a politician — [he is] one of the most skilled politicians we’ve seen in years.”
A longtime adviser to Hillary Clinton struck a similar theme. Referring to the front-runner’s “not a natural politician” remark, the adviser said, “I think it’s an accurate statement and a humble recognition of reality.”
The person added, however, that Clinton’s comparative lack of magnetism and ease was far from a disqualification for the Oval Office.
“It’s important to keep in mind that only part of the job of being president involves ‘commanding the stage’ in that way, and she brings world-class leadership skills to the task in other ways. … There is virtue in her wonkiness, and it’s worth embracing.”
Another source, a friend of Clinton’s dating back years, pushed back against the idea that these recent statements amount to a strategic gambit in and of themselves.
“I thought it was a very honest moment. … She’s saying ‘I get it,’ and I think she’s enormously effective in those moments. It gives you a window into her thinking.”
Still, Sheinkopf noted that there was some risk in using a loaded phrase such as “not a natural politician,” given Clinton’s long and often tumultuous time in public life.
“It will be reinterpreted,” he said, suggesting the phrase can make for “extraordinarily effective ads against her in the fall where [opponents] will be able to dredge up all these things from her past.
“Hillary Clinton says she is not a natural politician,” Sheinkopf went on, using the ominous tone of an attack-ad narrator. “'Well, look at what she’s done. Look at all this money coming into the Clinton Foundation. It sure sounds like she’s a natural politician.’"