THE HILL
 

Two GOP heavyweights turning primary into Texas-sized battle

By Reid Wilson - 09/24/09 07:07 PM ET

Everything is bigger in Texas.

As two of the state’s leading Republicans speed toward a primary showdown in 2010, that adage will again prove prescient.

Rarely do two political giants — who have at times been mentioned as potential presidential contenders — clash as they will when Gov. Rick Perry (R) faces Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R) in the state’s March 2 gubernatorial primary. And the candidates will spend what Perry estimates to be $50 million defining themselves and their records — rarely in the nicest of tones.

In what promises to be the collision of an immovable object and an unstoppable force, voters in Texas will decide who will hold the Republican nomination for governor based on two very different views of the Lone Star State and of Washington.

Entrenched in Austin as he runs for a third term, Perry looks to his past in that city, asserting his policies have insulated Texas from the worst of the economic recession.

“The policies that we’ve put in place in Texas [have] put us in a very unique place,” Perry said at a recent roundtable with reporters in D.C. “The state of Texas finds itself to be in a rather enviable position. Yes, we have challenges. We’ve shed jobs in some sectors. But we still have about a thousand people a day moving to Texas.”

Hurtling toward him is Hutchison, who has been in the Senate since winning a special election in 1993. She portrays Perry’s tenure as a time of divisiveness more akin to Washington than Austin, faulting the governor for a marked decline in power for the state Republican Party. Hutchison blames Perry for failing to focus on Texas’s own future.

“We’re not preparing our students for an educated workforce for the future, and that is something I’m going to focus on, because we have one of the highest high school dropout rates in the country and we have one of the highest uninsured rates in the country, and those are not good signals for the future,” Hutchison said in an interview with The Hill.

To Hutchison, the future of Texas dovetails with the future of the Republican Party, something to which Perry has not tended.

“Under Gov. Perry’s leadership, our party has dwindled from 88 in the Texas House to 76 [seats, out of 150]. We are two away from losing the Texas House. Just last year we lost five of the six largest counties in Texas,” she said. “Now, we’re not going to keep a good business climate in Texas if the Republican Party narrows its base so much that we are no longer the majority.”

But before she is able to rebuild the party, in Texas or anywhere, Hutchison will have to get by Perry. Hutchison once sported a substantial lead in the contest, but following a well-publicized moment at a tea party protest on April 15, in which Perry seemed to suggest Texas might secede from the union, the governor’s numbers surged. Polls now suggest the two are running evenly, while many political experts say they think Perry has the momentum.

Perry has adopted that moment of political fortune — when he repeatedly cited the 10th Amendment rights of states — as his campaign theme.

“I hope to be able to be a very influential governor in creating a 10th Amendment movement that makes Washington less and less impactful on the states,” Perry said. “I’m going to run against Washington until Washington changes.

“What I would dearly love to do is have the [comparison] between how Washington is governed and how Texas is governed,” Perry added.

Yet Hutchison calls Perry’s statements a double standard, arguing that he is doing little more than fear-mongering. She presents her rival as someone who would get along well in Washington.

“What’s confusing to me is that the governor rants against Washington but yet is always asking for more from FEMA, asking for more from the stimulus funding, balanced the state budget with stimulus funding, and he constantly criticizes Washington for not doing enough and yet if he’s serious about secession or walking away from Washington, he’s not sending a very clear message,” Hutchison said.

Though there is no resign-to-run law in Texas, Hutchison has said she plans to step down at some point this year, a decision that leaves many campaign experts scratching their heads. By walking away, some argue, Hutchison is giving up a chance to be seen as a major impediment to Democratic legislation and an opportunity to use her seat on the Senate Appropriations Committee to twist arms and seek favors. Her Senate term doesn’t expire until 2012.

Hutchison told The Hill she will stay in the Senate through the end of the debate over healthcare, which she called “the most important issue we might face in my [tenure].” That stance recalls another Texas senator, Phil Gramm, who helped his 1996 presidential prospects by declaring President Bill Clinton’s attempt to overhaul healthcare would pass “over my cold, dead political body.”

By leaving the Senate, Hutchison says, she will make clear to Texans she is serious about running for governor next year. But it is clear that Hutchison and Perry are already focused on each other, and there is little love lost between the two. As she attacks his record, Perry countercharges that Hutchison has yet to lay out her own vision.

“She’s had eight months to lay out her vision of what she would do, and I would challenge you to go back to Texas and find one person who could tell you why she wants to be the governor of the state of Texas, other than that she hates Washington, D.C., and wants to move back to Texas,” Perry said.

Hutchison called Perry’s ‑‑attacks on her owning a house in Arlington, Va., a “cheap shot.”

Perry “acts more like Washington. He has divided people. He’s been really unable to lead the Legislature, because he’s polarizing,” Hutchison said.

The eventual winner, as bloodied as he or she may be, will begin the general election as the front-runner against one of a small handful of Democrats in the race. Former U.S. Ambassador Tom Schieffer (D), a close friend of President George W. Bush, is running against former Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle (D) and entertainer Kinky Friedman.

Friedman is seeking the Democratic nomination after taking 12 percent in the general election as an Independent in 2006.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/60279-two-gop-heavyweights-turning-primary-into-texas-sized-battle-

Comments (8)

Actually, Ronnie Earle has not declared for Gov yet-but Hank Gilbert has.BY boadicea on 09/24/2009 at 22:14
Well, Kay Bailey seems to forget that TX sends more $$ to the feds than they return to Texans, in all types of federal programs. Why shouldn't we get our own money's worth? I'm no fan of Hers(abandoning responsible position to live childhood dream) or His(WTF, is he for real?). I nominate Ron Paul. Bring him home, to actually make a difference.BY Teri on 09/24/2009 at 22:37
Kay Bailey Hutchinson, I am not a fan of yours and I sure not since you are abandoning your Senate seat after I VOTE for you. I will tell you one thing I will not vote for you as Governor. I don't know why you think you are better than everyone that you can't time to answer your emails.BY Helen on 09/25/2009 at 01:31
It's amazing to me how we (Texans) can forget all of the sucesses Sen. Hutchison has brought to Texas during her tenure in the senate. As a female voter, I can not wait until she start campaiging for the governors office to assist her campaign win. She is what our state need. She has an excellent record on transportation and education funding for texas and most important, bringing texans together. She will become one of the best governors Texas has ever had…"and I cannot wait"…BY Michele on 09/25/2009 at 08:02
There is a third Republican in the race. Debra Medina is a grassroots activist and while she does not have the money that Hutchison and Perry do, she is by far the best choice. Like voters across the nation, Texans are weary of career politicians and are looking for patriots who are willing to serve for a time and then leave the political stage. Ms. Medina is qualified, loves Texas and understands what it means 'to serve' a state you love. Both Hutchison and Perry have become 'the issue' and lost sight of being a 'public servant'. It is a disgrace that career politicians do not understand that 'after a season' it is time to leave the public arena gracefully.BY Lydia Damrel on 09/25/2009 at 08:17
Senator Hutchiinson would have better served her state by remaining in the Senate. Although, on the Banking Committee she was not able to impact the problems associated with that industry. Governor Perry has strong ties to DOD and continues to fight for stronger border controls. I feel strongly that she should complete the term of the Senate position she ran for in 2005, not put her Senate seat in jeapordy, and then run for Governor, if perfromance in the Seante dictates.BY Craig  on 09/25/2009 at 11:36
I'd just as soon both Perry and Hutchison drop out, since neither one of them seems to understand the concept of limited government.Perry's quotes about sovereignty and secession are mere posturing. He wants to be president so bad it hurts. Kay Bailey also wants to use the governor's mansion as a stepping stone to the White House.We need a governor who will lead us AWAY from Washington, not closer to it.BY Dave Mundy on 09/26/2009 at 12:42
Mic[***]e wrote about Senator Hutchison: "She has an excellent record on transportation and education funding for texas and most important, bringing texans together."I hope that her bringing Texans together will also bunch the flies.BY Charles from Cape Co on 09/27/2009 at 12:24

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.