THE HILL
 

Senator DeMint bucks Republican party, backs conservative in California race

By Reid Wilson - 11/04/09 06:00 AM ET

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) endorsed conservative California State Assemblyman Chuck DeVore (R) Tuesday, once again going against the wishes of his party.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) has made no endorsement in the California Senate race, but party leaders favor former Hewlett-Packard executive Carly Fiorina (R), a wealthy centrist whom many believe could give Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) a strong challenge.

Later this month, Fiorina will be the guest of honor at a Washington fundraiser featuring Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), John Thune (R-S.D.), Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and three others, along with veterans of McCain’s 2008 presidential bid, for which Fiorina served as a key spokeswoman.

But DeMint is rarely persuaded by appeals to party loyalty. Earlier this year, he became one of several very conservative Republican senators to back former Florida House Speaker Marco Rubio (R) over Gov. Charlie Crist (R). Now he is backing DeVore.

“Chuck DeVore is a proven, tested conservative who is gaining momentum. He’s the kind of leader who we can count on to stand up for common-sense conservative principles in the United States Senate,” DeMint said on a conference call Tuesday evening. “If grassroots conservatives get behind him, he can win the primary in June and go on to defeat Barbara Boxer in November.”

DeMint’s political action committee, the Senate Conservatives Fund, has also endorsed fellow arch-conservative Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.). DeMint himself has endorsed Rep. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), with whom he shares a media consultant, for an open Senate seat. DeMint also backed Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman in New York before enough pressure mounted to force the more liberal GOP nominee out of the race.

One of the most conservative members in the upper chamber, DeMint is also one of those least willing to compromise on Republican ideals. He offered a tepid endorsement of McCain in 2008 after his candidate, former Gov. Mitt Romney (R), dropped out of the presidential sweepstakes, and he has said he would rather have 30 pure conservatives in the Senate than a majority of centrists.

“Jim DeMint just doesn’t bend much, and that’s why he’s going to have very little trouble getting reelected,” said Katon Dawson, the former South Carolina GOP chairman and a DeMint ally. “DeMint has been one of the U.S. senators who has stepped forward to carry the conservative banner.”

Still, others say DeMint is wrong to insist that candidates across the country fit his ideological mold. Referring to DeMint’s claim that he would like to see a conference of 30 pure conservatives, one GOP official shuddered: “If we were to adhere to his candidate selection, he would get his wish.”

But the notion of pragmatists versus conservatives within the GOP is one that has gained prominence of late. As in the special election in New York and the Senate contest in Florida, California could emerge as a state in which a clash takes place. Fiorina is not as liberal as the New York Republican, but she does not have the conservative bona fides DeVore does.

Fiorina is expected to make her candidacy official this week. DeVore, an Orange County Republican, has been in the race for a year.

A Field Poll, conducted between Sept. 18 and Oct. 6, shows Boxer leading Fiorina by 49 percent to 35, while the incumbent has a 50-33 percent lead over DeVore. A sub-sample of Republican primary voters showed Fiorina and DeVore statistically tied.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/66169-demint-bucks-party-backs-conservative-in-california

Comments (22)

poorly written , edited article imo . Twice while reading it i was led to believe Mr.Hoffman was the Rino in a Conservative coat . Must know it's sellout memememe Dede . Any way Senator DeMint , the GOP should damn sure listen and watch . He is what 90% of Independences and Conservatives want . Less spending,less government means just that . Obama's problem . He's not full filling nor even working on his campaign promises . Just thug along the beltway Barry .Kiss it Good ByeBY TST on 11/04/2009 at 10:51
Jim Demint is the type of Republican that represents the extreme view of the conservative movement. If he is going to complain that Democrats are to liberal or to far left of the political spectrum, he should look at himself and not be to far to the political right of the spectrum. To govern in this nation, you need to represent all views within your district and state. Therefore, you need to govern from the political center where you can get things done, compromise, and bring a better tomorrow for all Americans. Having this closed minded viewpoint that the Republican Party should only be conservative that fits his profile is ridiculous and sad because you're not listening and being inclusive to others viewpoints. And this is why the Republican Party will be continue to shrink while the tent of the Democratic Party will grow and solicite all viewpoints and make things work.BY Rick on 11/04/2009 at 11:36
Thank you Sen. DeMint. Liberal rule and wild spending has just about destroyed the once great state of California. We need a Senator like DeVore.BY Bear Flag guy on 11/04/2009 at 12:02
I love it! A rerun of New York 23. An unpopular movement pitted against a rich unpopular personality. Burn Baby Burn - Conservative dollars and chances of governance I mean.BY LEONARDO DE NAVARRO on 11/04/2009 at 12:23
News flash Rick, DeMint is not extreme in the least. Was George Washington extreme? Were all the Founding Fathers and their beliefs that created this country extreme in your eyes? Why do liberals think that rejecting the principles that gave us liberty, created this country, and allowed it to prosper are "extreme"? Jim DeMint represents the spirit of America. We don't need two parties that are exactly the same. If Obama and his policies are going to govern the Democratic party for any period of time, that party has moved to the radical left. Obama is not a centrist. How can anyone think so looking at his policies? He talks about playing nice and being willing to compromise, then doesn't want to listen to anything Republicans have to say, and lies over and over again about they don't have any ideas. He just doesn't like their ideas because they don't involve government take overs and the loss of liberty for citizens. I'm glad DeMint stands firm on his principles. I'm from South Carolina, and the differences between him and Senator Graham are astronomical. People in SC hate Lindsey Graham because he's not a real conservative. He doesn't stand on values. If the Republicans become a true conservative party people will have a clear choice: liberty, individuality, and prosperity with Republicans or slavery, dependence, and economic despair under the Democrats.BY AdamC. on 11/04/2009 at 13:58
Clearly Senator DeMint does not know Chuck Devore too well. I live in Orange County, CA and most of us see Chuck Devore as a clown. He is just a do nothing right wing tool. On second thought maybe DeMint knows him well. Devore sounds like a typical conservative candidate.As a Dem I can only hope he is Boxer's opponent.BY Sean H. Mill on 11/04/2009 at 14:45
a wealthy centrist whom many believe could give Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), a wealthy leftist, a strong challenge.FixedBY Frossca on 11/04/2009 at 16:04
Sorry AdamC - but the Founding Fathers and their principles which gave us our liberty; were the same ones that allowed slavery to persist in the United States. The Founding Fathers, while intelligent, were not all-seeing by any stretch, nor did they expect themselves to be. Typical Southern answer, they hate big gov't and yet for every dollar they put into the tax pool, they get $1.25 back in benefits. Clearly that money isn't going into the education system. And our current economic despair? Definitely happened under the watch of the conservatives…how quickly you forget.BY BrianH on 11/04/2009 at 16:59
BrianH: I believe the Community Reinvestment Act was passed under a Democrat president (Carter) and enlarged under Clinton. That was the beginning of the current financial mess. I agree, the Republicans screwed up royally when they were in control, too, by acting like mad-spending Democrats. Didn't Pelosi promise to "drain the swamp" and Obama promise the most open and transparent government ever? How is that working out? CORRUPTION on both sides is the problem…not CONSERVATISM!! The deficit was huge under Bush, but Obama has tripled it in just 10 months! Is all that stimulus money working for you? Then your kids and grandkids won't mind paying for it, will they?BY Mimi on 11/04/2009 at 17:42
"the Founding Fathers and their principles which gave us our liberty; were the same ones that allowed slavery to persist in the United States."——No Brian, their principles did not allow slavery to persist, the reality of the situation did. If you actually read the historical documents from that time, you would know that many of the most influential Founders, even the ones that owned slaves like Washington, abhorred the institution. Both under the Articles of Confederation, and during the Constitutional Convention, the country was too fragile for another war to break out over slavery. If a compromise was not made at this point, the Union would have never been formed under the Constitution. Two Americas would have existed right from the start, one pro-slavery and one against, with war between the two destined to happen. This situation does cast doubt on the legitimacy of our founding principles: all men are created equal under God, God gave us our rights not government, men should be free to craft their own destiny in the absence of a tyrannical government, individual liberty and the right to property are indistinguishab le, free market capitalism is superior, etc.——"And our current economic despair? Definitely happened under the watch of the conservatives"——What? Are you serious? The problems we are facing right now stem from decades of government interference in the market. The Democrats have had more control of Congress in the past 50 years than the Republicans have. Liberal policies caused this recession. The notion of unfettered unregulated capitalism run amuck is a complete myth. You obviously don't know anything about history, philosopy, or economics, so I will excuse your ignorance.BY AdamC. on 11/04/2009 at 17:49

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.