THE HILL
 

Top 10 conservative conundrums of 2010

By Aaron Blake - 11/07/09 05:24 PM ET

The conservative turmoil in New York’s special election has been the story of the last two weeks, and Republican leaders are now concerned about an ideological and anti-establishment backlash in other races.

It remains to be seen whether a legitimate movement will form. But if it does, there are certain races where it will first catch on.

The Hill looks at the Top 10 conservative conundrums on the GOP’s map:

1. Florida Senate -- Marco Rubio vs. Gov. Charlie Crist

If conservative activists had their chance to take down one frontrunner, it would be Crist. And they might get their chance, as Crist has shown some chinks in his armor of late. If and when Rubio gets the support of the Club for Growth, look for this race to shift into an even higher gear. Rubio will benefit from New York conservative candidate Doug Hoffman’s momentum in the new conservative cause célèbre.

2. Kentucky Senate – Rand Paul vs. Trey Grayson


Grayson’s Senate candidacy has yet to light the world on fire, and he has now been both outraised and outpolled. A SurveyUSA poll this week showed Paul overtaking Grayson 35-32, with much yet to be decided in their race. When you look at the national map, Paul’s candidacy is the real test of whether the movement of his father, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), can succeed at the statewide level.

3. New Hampshire 2nd. District – Jennifer Horn vs. former Rep. Charlie Bass

Bass, as the pro-abortion rights former head of the centrist Republican Main Street Partnership, is a natural target for conservatives. Horn has plenty of name recognition as the 2008 GOP nominee for the seat, and she’s going after Bass hard. At the tail end of the New York special election, she endorsed Hoffman and said she thought the same dynamic would play out in her race with Bass. Even Bass supporters admit Horn could give him a run for his money, but a diluted primary field could hurt her chances.

4. Ohio 15th district – Anti-abortion crowd vs. Steve Stivers


Stivers is also pro-abortion rights, and it likely cost him a seat in Congress. In his near-miss 2008 loss to now-Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy (D-Ohio), he ceded 10 percent of the vote to anti-abortion rights third-party candidates. Now, Ron Paul supporter David Ryon could fill the void in 2010. Ryon isn’t going to win, but the 2008 third-party candidates didn’t need much money. And if he can put together some funds, it could be really damaging for Stivers.

5. California Senate – Chuck DeVore vs. Carly Fiorina

While Rubio and Hughes have tapped into some conservative discontent, DeVore is different; the assemblyman was actually part of the movement before he launched his campaign. Sen. Jim DeMint’s (R-S.C.) endorsement of DeVore, which coincided with Fiorina’s launch this week, has now lent DeVore some credibility. Money is a problem for him, especially since it is a big reason the establishment likes Fiorina. But as long as DeVore has enough to get his name out there, he can’t be counted out.

6. Illinois Senate – Patrick Hughes vs. Rep. Mark Kirk


It’s not yet clear whether Hughes will have what it takes to upset Kirk, but the congressman’s recent tacking to the right on issues like cap and trade make it clear that he’s aware of his right flank. And this week’s revelation that Kirk has been lobbying for Sarah Palin’s endorsement is the clincher. Hughes, a developer, is fighting a battle (a la Rubio) to prove that he has a chance against a well-funded frontrunner, and getting over that hump will be key to his chances.

7. Virginia 5th district – Field vs. Robert Hurt

Hurt’s vote for a $1.4 billion 2004 tax increase has haunted him ever since, and now that he’s running for Congress, it will be a campaign issue. It’s not yet clear whether he will have formidable primary opposition, but at the very least he could cede some votes in the general election to third-party Fair Tax advocate Bradley Rees. And general election votes will be at a premium against Rep. Tom Perriello (D-Va.).

8. South Carolina 4th district – Field vs. Rep. Bob Inglis

Inglis’s real trouble began when he opposed the troop increase in Iraq in 2007, but he has also irritated his conservative base on environmental issues. He has gotten by without a tough primary challenge – until now. Prosecutor Trey Gowdy and state Sen. David Thomas are both building war chests and could give Inglis real problems this time. If conservatives can narrow their focus to one of the two, that’s even worse for Inglis.

9. Ohio’s 16th district – Matt Miller vs. Jim Renacci

Miller took 42 percent against Rep. Ralph Regula (R-Ohio) in 2006 and lost an open seat primary by five points in 2008. The former Ashland County commissioner has been largely overlooked, but he won’t be this time. With Republicans promoting a wealthy political newcomer in businessman Jim Renacci, Miller’s name recognition and base could loom large. With so many voters having chosen Miller before, Renacci will have to give them a good reason to switch to his side next year. This one has less an ideological flare than an anti-establishment one.

10. New Hampshire – Field vs. Kelly Ayotte

Wealthy businessman Bill Binnie got into the race this week, and we’re still waiting on former gubernatorial candidate Ovide Lamontagne and others to make their decisions. Ayotte doesn’t have a voting record and she hasn’t run for office, so going after her on issues will be a process. Much of the early knocks on her have to do with how she’s the establishment favorite. If anything, it looks like there might be too many candidates making that argument for any of them to take advantage of it. If she’s head-to-head with one of them, though, it could get interesting.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/66835-the-top-10-conservative-conundrums-of-2010-

Comments (15)

If the primary campaigns are positive, then the candidate that wins the primary should be stronger for the process. Therefore the Republican Party should insist that groups and candidates vying in primaries run positive campaigns, unless they are attacked by Democrats or by liberal advocacy groups.BY Chris Baker on 11/07/2009 at 19:24
Word to the wise.. NH D-2 belongs to neither Bass nor Horn, but Bob Giuda.Bob is a pilot, ex-military and has held office locally (State Rep) previous to this.http://www.bobgiuda.com/BY District 2 on 11/07/2009 at 20:25
Food for thought. Rand Paul is raising over a million dollars a month. He is young, dynamic, and honest. People have been elected to the presidency with just the first two…even if they had no record of accomplishment.BY Will on 11/08/2009 at 03:46
I saw Rubio speak a few nights ago. He was awesome. In addition to being a conservative, he has wide appeal as a young, Hispanic with a great track record and lot's of charisma. But, the issue isn't just who's more conservative. It's Crist's continuing hypocrisy (when it comes to the stimulus, when it comes to free markets, when it comes to taking credit for a reduced budget, etc, etc) and his constant pandering and self-promotion. He has the typical characteristics of a sleazy politician, and haven't we had enough of this kind?Vote for Rubio. We don't need any more Crists in our govt.BY Artist on 11/08/2009 at 08:29
No question here. If Rs keep setting aside core beliefs they will keep on loosing, even in spite of D incompetence. Even if they do win after deserting the base… what benefit is it?BY Larry Miller on 11/08/2009 at 08:40
It would be unwise to ignore the libertarian component of the Ron Paul movement. When we say, "Nominate a true conservative and win, or a RINO and lose," the word "true" means the libertarian values of the original Republican Party, as opposed to the social conservative views introduced more recently by the religious extremists. For example, many Ron Paul activists will support a candidate who's pro-choice, but not one who supports the War on Drugs.BY John Cunningham on 11/08/2009 at 09:44
Kelly Ayotte is a very poor candidate for any office. When she was Attorney General, an Assistant Attorney General told me and my colleagues, the selectmen of our community, that we could never support any candidates or issues that were to come before the voters. But the law she invoked concerned electioneering at polling place during an election, which we did not do and never have done. In fact, prior to Town Meeting, we believe it is our duty to support certain issues that are before the voters—the budget, for example—so we always do. But because we do not wish to do anything wrong, I wrote to Ayotte requesting clarification. She didn't answer I wrote again by registered mail. She refused to answer even then. Did she not know the answer and couldn't be bothered to find out? Or did she want to conceal a mistake made by her office? In either event, to ignore an important question, especially if the question concerns the election laws and the people who manage the elections, is a bad sign in any public official, and I would hate to see such an official representing our state on the national level. There is enough incompetence and dishonesty already. I hope we don't elect someone who will contribute more of either one.BY elizabeth thomas on 11/08/2009 at 12:50
Marco Rubio comes to Pinellas to deliver the most important speech of the campaign, asking PCREC to 'divorce' Crist. http://bit.ly/1avmD8BY Peter  on 11/08/2009 at 15:05
Attn: Independents, ALL INCUMBENTS MUST BE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE! We already know what they have brought to the table, it ain't fitt'in to eat. Let them eat cake!BY Jane on 11/08/2009 at 17:17
Bob Inglis should be on his way out in SC. He also voted for the bailout, and mocked conservatives who like Glen Beck.BY AdamC. on 11/08/2009 at 20:27

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.