THE HILL
 

Obama to debut Afghan troop strategy; says he intends 'to finish the job'

By Sam Youngman - 11/24/09 12:43 PM ET

President Barack Obama said Tuesday that he will announce his strategy for Afghanistan after Thanksgiving.

“My intention is to finish the job,” Obama said in comments from the White House.

This may be a hint that the president will send additional troops to a country where the U.S. has been embroiled in war for more than eight years. Obama also appeared to give a nod to weakening support for a  war that, according to polls, is no longer though winnable by a majority of the public.

“I think once the American people hear a clear rationale for what we're doing there and how we intend to achieve our goals, they will be supportive,” Obama said.

The president hinted that the U.S. had lost focus on the mission and not provided adequate strategy or resources to the region, a theme from his presidential campaign. He said it is in the strategic interest of the U.S. to target al-Qaeda and its allies to “dismantle and degrade their capabilities and ultimately destroy their networks.”

Obama spoke from the East Room of the White House after a meeting with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Obama is reportedly considering several options that involve different troops levels. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the commander of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan, has reportedly requested that an additional 40,000 troops be sent, but Obama is choosing between options that range from 10,000 troops to 80,000 troops.

The U.S. has 68,000 troops in Afghanistan.

Obama did not confirm reports that he will address the nation next Tuesday, saying only he would make his announcement after Thanksgiving. Several news outlets reported Obama will address the nation in primetime on Tuesday, Dec. 1.

The president spoke one day after a ninth meeting of his war council. Earlier on Tuesday, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Obama received all the information he had asked for at that Monday night meeting.

Obama said he found the meetings to be “comprehensive and extremely useful,” adding that he heard from both military and civilian advisers.

Monday night’s meeting was the ninth that Obama has held with advisors on the policy going forward in Afghanistan. Those attending included Vice President Joe Biden, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and National Security Adviser Jim Jones.

Obama is scheduled to meet with Gates and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Tuesday afternoon.

White House Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag also attended the meeting in a possible reflection of worries about how an increase in troops could impact the nation’s budget. The deficit has become an increasing worry for the White House and Congress as lawmakers gear up for the 2010 elections.

The decision will be one of the most momentous of Obama’s first year in office. After arguing during the presidential campaign about the importance of winning the fight in Afghanistan, Obama has clearly been torn over whether to send more troops to that country.

Obama’s party is divided over whether more troops should be sent to Afghanistan. Congress would have to approve funds to pay for the additional troops, and several senior lawmakers have floated the idea of paying for the war with a tax on the wealthy.

Republicans are urging Obama to back McChrystal’s request and have accused the president of dithering in his decision. Obama may depend on GOP lawmakers to support funding for the war if he loses liberals in his party.

After the eighth meeting of his war council, the president was said to be unhappy with the strategies laid out before him, and he emphasized in comments to the press that he needed to be convinced that there is a way to hand over control of Afghanistan's security to that country’s government.

Obama also met with Clinton Monday afternoon. She recently returned from an unscheduled trip to Afghanistan, where she met with President Hamid Karzai and attended his second inauguration.

The administration has worried over whether Karzai’s government, which has been accused of corruption, would make it difficult for any military action in Afghanistan to succeed.

This story was initially posted at 7:26 a.m. and updated at 12:43 p.m.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/69249-obama-ready-to-make-afghanistan-decision

Comments (47)

NO WAR BRING OUR TROOPS HOME!!! one of the reasons we are in serious debt is because the cost of war. Obama is going to send 34,000 troops and 40 billion dollars of taxpayer money to get it done PLEASE!!! 40 billion dollars which could be spent on the taxpayer which could be spent on saving social security and medicare before they run out of money. This president is out of touch with the poor people and going down the same path Bush took us down. A path of WAR WAR WAR. Bush was wrong on Iraq just as Obama is wrong on Afghanistan. We need a timetable for withdrawl but of course democrats will not do that cause both parties are war mongers. We are sending our men and women to die for a lost cause. LET US SPEND THE MONEY FOR THE WAR HERE WHERE IT IS NEEDED THE MOST. OBAMA LIED PEOPLE DIED!!!BY Josh on 11/24/2009 at 08:11
news this morning said obama found a middle of the road plan for the war, i guess that means he still cant make a decision, its like staying neutral in an argument, you take the middle ground, i dont know what his plan is, but its too late to send all the troops mccrystal wanted, he waited too long on that one, and since there will never be peace over there, he needs to just send all the troops home, its a losing battle and they dont want us there, cant wait to hear his plan, just this morning another american soilder was killed over there, please just send our troops home now and stop this uselell war, there was a threat at a fort in gorgia that said it would be another fort hood shooting, does obama know this? does he care?BY cargo65 on 11/24/2009 at 08:58
Josh, I feel your pain, but if Bush had correctly spent the military resources on Afghanistan eight years ago instead of his folly in Iraq, the troops would likely be headed home from Afghanistan now.Look, I'm sure you don't want another 9/11 any more than me or anyone else and the only way to ensure that is to make sure Afghanistan is secure, free of the Taliban and can't revert to the al-Qaeda Hilton — otherwise, there will likely be more attacks on America. Also, unlike the British and the USSR, our Afghanistan mission has never been one of conquest and subjugation. It's about protecting our necks by wiping out the al-Qaeda terrorists who attacked us and their sponsors.And Obama isn't lying.He never once in the campaign called for bringing troops home from Afghanistan. He promised a return of troops from Iraq, still scheduled for 2011.Also, none of us has heard or seen his plan.At least Obama took a great deal of time to think about it and reportedly has both a handoff to Afghan military and a firm end date in the plan — something Bush never had for Iraq.Let's save our collective judgment until we hear the announcement.BY Lefty Grove on 11/24/2009 at 09:02
I am writing from England. Whatever Obama does, troop number wise, will be reported immediatly, here.There is a kind of irony, in as much as the man who stood side by side by your previous President in going to war, has been rejected as applicant as EU President and is hardly worth a mention by your media. Obama is carrying a poisened Chalice from both men.BY Hastings on 11/24/2009 at 09:59
I am SO GLAD we have a smart, thoughtful, considerate president. I trust that the analysis and planning of Obama, his cabinet, and the military will be effective. It will be difficult, but I am confident that with our leadership and our military that we can do anything we set our minds to as long as we plan accordingly… something that obviously did NOT happen when Republicans ran Washington DC. Thank You President Obama and God Bless our Troops!BY Ethan on 11/24/2009 at 10:34
President Barack Obama is expected to address the nation Tuesday on his new Afghanistan policy…For more information http://www.35energy.com/news/Obama-to-address-nation-next-week.htmlBY James on 11/24/2009 at 10:34
Wow, Ethan still has the "hope and change" thing going on even though Obama has shown to be an epic failure, liar, Marxist. Keep those blinders on buddy. Obama is Bush X10. Smell that? It's coffee.BY Pete on 11/24/2009 at 10:49
history will record war in afghanistan as the US worst pyrhhic victory. america is severely strained by the taliban winning the war of attrition and we are emaciated by the global economic depression. sure, obama will say his strategy is victorious because it is good PRBY fullerton on 11/24/2009 at 10:59
bfd what a waste of life obama is. God Bless America and to L with ACORN bogus bama. LIES LIES LIES is all the Balloon Boy knows.BY jake2 on 11/24/2009 at 11:13
My uncle, once the best scholar in his school, has his name on the Basra Memorial in Iraq. He died in the first world war. Do I think we've learned anything since then… WARSee-saw margery daw who's right when it comes to warWhat kind of mind puts into plan strategiesKnown only to manIn an authorized place or hidden roomA stranger with forethought plans your doomIf carried out they're well aware you'll be blown to [***]Do they care. If they knew you they might well soWhere hate rules supreme it's all systems goJustification you'll find is the name of the gameWhomever the players the result is the sameFrom rocks then arrows to missile filled skiesCould a moment's misjudgment lead to worldwide demiseThe truth is..it's only humans that can..think up..plan wellAnd carry through…man's inhumanity…to manBY Hastings on 11/24/2009 at 11:16

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.