The House's most ardent opponent of earmarks wants to prohibit members from accepting campaign contributions from earmark recipients.
Rep. Jeff FlakeJeff FlakeOvernight Regulation: Senate moves to strike Obama-era internet privacy rules Overnight Tech: Senate votes to eliminate Obama internet privacy rules | FCC chief wants to stay out of 'political debate' on fake news | Wikileaks reveals new CIA docs Senate votes to block internet privacy regulations MORE (R-Ariz.) has asked the House Ethics committee to deem political contributions a "financial interest." Under House rules, lawmakers cannot submit earmarks if they have a financial interest in the business benefiting from the earmark.
"While certainly no one would assert that every member of Congress receiving a campaign contribution from an earmark recipient was doing so for the purpose of financial gain, the House of Representatives simply cannot continue to permit the appearance of impropriety associated with members providing no-bid or sole source federal contracts to campaign contributors," he wrote in his letter.
House rules now require members submitting earmark requests to certify that they have no financial interest in the businesses receiving them. The House ethics manual does not regard contributions to a member's campaign committee or leadership PAC a "financial interest."
In the past three months, Flake has offered eight resolutions to force the ethics committee to investigate contributions from the now-defunct lobbying group PMA, its clients and the lawmakers who have directed earmarks to those clients.
But he held off bringing the measure up on the House floor for a ninth time last week after a Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) offered a separate resolution on PMA. Hoyer's measure called on Ethics to disclose whether it has launched an investigation into PMA within 45 days. That measure passed on a mainly party-line vote, though twenty-seven Republicans voted with the Democratic majority.
In the meantime, Flake would like the committee to consider revising its financial interest rules, which he said would make them consistent with the ethical responsibilities of members and federal and state guidelines to prevent the appearance of pay-to-play politics.
"The Committee on Standards of Official Conduct need not and should not sit idle, awaiting the outcome of Justice Department investigations, before addressing an obvious issue that is tarnishing the dignity of the House," he wrote.