By Jared Allen - 06/11/09 08:17 PM EDT
Energy panel Republicans are levying accusations of witness intimidation against Democratic Rep. Ed MarkeyEd MarkeyDem senators call for sanctions on Congo Honor Frank Lautenberg by protecting our kids Sanders pans chemical safety reform deal MORE (D-Mass.), one of the key authors of the contentious House climate change bill.
Republicans have seized on a letter – a copy of which was obtained by The Hill – that Markey penned to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chairman Jon Wellinghoff asking FERC to investigate the actions of a major energy company on the same day that the company’s CEO was set to testify before the energy panel on the dangers of a carbon cap and trade system.
In fact, Markey singled out MidAmerican Energy to also ask FERC to look into his concerns “that the repeal of PUHCA has also freed large multi-state public utility companies to diversify into other potentially risky business, to the potential detriment of utility investors and consumers.”
“For example, MidAmerican Holdings has acquired the second largest real estate brokerage company in the country,” Markey wrote in his six-page letter. “What protections have been put in place to prevent utility shareholders, such as those of MidAmerican Holdings’ regulated utilities, to prevent them from rate increases, higher costs for borrowing, or other risks with might be associated with unsuccessful or failed diversifications?”
Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), the ranking Republican on Markey’s Energy and Environment Subcommittee, received a copy of the letter.
GOP sources confirmed that Republicans reacted furiously when they saw that the letter was sent the very same day that MidAmerican’s CEO, David L. Sokol, was testifying as a Republican witness before Markey’s subcommittee.
In a move to mollify a number of panel members, Waxman and Markey held a June 9 hearing in Markey’s subcommittee on the allocation of carbon emission allowances provided for in the climate change legislation completed by the full panel just prior to the Memorial Day recess.
In his prepared remarks to the subcommittee, Sokol said that the “bill’s trading mechanism will impose a huge and unacceptable double cost on customers: first to pay for emission allowances, which will not reduce greenhouse gas emissions by one ounce, and then for the construction of new low- and zero-carbon power plants and other actions that will actually do the job of reducing these emissions.”
Noting that he supported the bill’s underlying goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 2005 levels by 2050, Sokol said the bill will cost “hundreds of billions of dollars,” just as Republicans have argued in their objections to the Waxman-Markey bill.
GOP sources said Republicans on the Energy Committee, including Ranking member Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas), confronted Markey about the letter.
The results of those conversations could not be learned.
But on June 10, the day after the allocations hearing, Markey penned a second letter to Wellinghoff to “clarify questions contained in my June 9, 2009 letter,” in which Markey wrote, “[M]y intent was for the Commission to analyze the activities of all investor-owned utilities with respect to their investments in transmission lines since PUHCA was (sic) revealed, and their investments in enterprises outside their core business.”
“I did not intend for the Commission to focus on just one company but rather on the industry as a whole,” Markey wrote.
“We sent a letter to FERC today clarifying that the FERC examine PUHCA repeal generically and not in the context of MidAmerican or any specific company,” said Daniel Reilly, a spokesman for the subcommittee chairman. “There was neither an attempt nor intent to intimidate any witness. The first letter focused on PUHCA repeal as part of our ongoing Subcommittee oversight. We sent today’s letter to FERC to clarify that intent.”
“In addition, Chairman Markey has reached out to MidAmerican to clear up any misunderstanding and to let them know that they are not the focus of the inquiry,” Reilly added.
Republicans were not satisfied.
“I am deeply troubled by the message this sends, whether it was accidental or intentional,” Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.), a member of the Energy and Environment Subcommittee said on Thursday. “If I had gotten that letter, I would have gotten the message that it was sent to intimidate me.”
“It is essential that witnesses be allowed to come forward and give candid testimony,” Shadegg added.
And now Republicans are tying the Energy and Commerce incident with Thursday reports that the staff of Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max BaucusMax BaucusWyden unveils business tax proposal College endowments under scrutiny The chaotic fight for ObamaCare MORE (D-Mont.) warned Democratic lobbyists not to let their clients meet with Republicans about health care legislation.
“This is another indication that Democrats on Capitol Hill are creating a culture of intimidation to pass bills that are unpopular with the American people,” said Michael Steel, spokesman for Republican Leader John BoehnerJohn BoehnerIn House GOP, Ryan endorsement of Trump seen as inevitable House GOP faces dilemma on spending bills Overnight Finance: Puerto Rico bill clears panel | IRS chief vows to finish term | Bill would require nominees to release tax returns MORE (R-Ohio). “We’ve already seen news reports indicating that, on health care, Democrats are threatening that even meeting with Republicans will be considered a hostile act. This shows they are using the same tactics when it comes to their job-killing national energy tax.”
Republican aides said they plan to publicly press further on the Markey letter, perhaps as early as Friday.