Dem leaders push voting rights fix

Dem leaders push voting rights fix
© Getty Images

Top House Democrats on Wednesday raised pressure on Republicans to consider legislation restoring the voting protections shot down by the Supreme Court last year.

Marking the one-year anniversary of the court's Shelby County v. Holder decision, the Democrats urged House GOP leaders to take up the bipartisan Voting Rights Amendment Act this summer, in time for November's midterm elections. 

ADVERTISEMENT
At a rally of advocates on the east lawn of the Capitol, Rep. Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerThe nearly 60 Dems who voted for impeachment House rejects Democrat's resolution to impeach Trump Pelosi, Hoyer: Now is not the time to consider impeachment MORE (D-Md.), the minority whip, urged the crowd to be "non-violent militants" in pushing Congress to pass the Voting Rights Act (VRA) update.

House Minority Leader Nancy PelosiNancy Patricia D'Alesandro PelosiMcConnell names Senate GOP tax conferees Abortion-rights group endorses Nadler in race to replace Conyers on Judiciary Trump rips Dems a day ahead of key White House meeting MORE (D-Calif.) characterized the Shelby ruling as "destructive," and invoked the passage of the original 1965 law as impetus for Congress to ensure the same protections are in place in 2014. 

"It changed America, it made us more American, it was long overdue. … What better way to observe that greatness … than to pass the Voting Rights [Amendment] Act?" Pelosi said.

"We have a bipartisan bill; it isn't the bill we would have written … but it does correct the decision of the court," she added. "We're calling upon the Speaker of the House to give us our vote on this bill so that we can protect the votes of millions of people."

She might not want to hold her breath. 

While the VRAA has the backing of several prominent Republicans — including former Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim SensenbrennerFrank (Jim) James SensenbrennerClock ticking down on NSA surveillance powers It's time to end big government spying on American citizens Dalai Lama worried US becoming more ‘selfish, nationalist’ MORE (Wis.), who helped draft the bill — GOP leaders have been less than enthusiastic about moving the proposal on the floor.

Judiciary Chairman Bob GoodlatteRobert (Bob) William GoodlatteRosenstein to testify before House Judiciary Committee next week Conservative pressure on Sessions grows Clock ticking down on NSA surveillance powers MORE (R-Va.) has shown no interest in examining the proposal in his committee. Majority Leader Eric CantorEric Ivan CantorEric Cantor: Moore ‘deserves to lose’ If we want to make immigration great again, let's make it bipartisan Top Lobbyists 2017: Hired Guns MORE (R-Va.) has expressed support for the concept but hasn't endorsed the bill, and his stunning primary defeat earlier in the month has tempered much of his influence in the GOP conference.

Speaker John BoehnerJohn Andrew BoehnerJohn Feehery: A political forest fire Trump's pick for Federal Reserve chief is right choice at right time The two-party system is dying — let’s put it out of its misery MORE (R-Ohio) said last week that, while "conversations are going to continue" in search of a response to the Shelby decision, he has "no idea" if the House will consider legislation this year.

"You'll have to talk to those who are working on it," he told reporters last Thursday.

In its 5-4 Shelby decision, the Supreme Court found that, while Congress has the power to monitor elections for fairness, the VRA formula dictating which states must get federal pre-clearance before altering their voting rules is outdated and therefore invalid. 

Chief Justice John Roberts invited Congress to "draft another formula based on current conditions."

Sensenbrenner's bill, introduced with Rep. John ConyersJohn James ConyersAbortion-rights group endorses Nadler in race to replace Conyers on Judiciary Democrats turn on Al Franken Michigan state senator to run for Congress MORE (D-Mich.), aims to do just that, creating a new formula based on violations of voter protections spanning the last 15 years. Under the updated bill, the number of states requiring federal pre-clearance would drop from nine to four.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who introduced companion legislation in the upper chamber, held a hearing Wednesday to promote his proposal. 

Foreshadowing a tough road ahead, Leahy lamented that "not a single Senate Republican" has endorsed the measure.