From taxes to guns, Obama's call for action lands silently in Republicans' laps

President Obama came to Congress on Tuesday night armed with a lengthy wish list of second-term proposals, and Republicans responded by staying in their seats.

On issues ranging from taxes to guns to climate change, Obama’s call for progressive action in his State of the Union address landed silently in the laps of the Republicans he needs to persuade to pass his agenda.

ADVERTISEMENT
House Majority Leader Eric CantorEric CantorThree strategies to help Clinton build 'Team of Teams' David Brat may run for Senate if Kaine becomes VP The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE (R-Va.), who runs the floor schedule in the lower chamber, sat through long portions of the president’s hour-long address without reacting. Speaker John BoehnerJohn BoehnerConservative allies on opposite sides in GOP primary fight Clinton maps out first 100 days The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE (R-Ohio) responded to the speech with blistering criticism, hours after telling television reporters that Obama lacked “guts” and the “courage” to confront his party on the deficit.

“In the last election, voters chose divided government which offers a mandate only to work together to find common ground,” BoehnerJohn BoehnerConservative allies on opposite sides in GOP primary fight Clinton maps out first 100 days The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE said in a statement following the president's address. “The president, instead, appears to have chosen a go-it-alone approach to pursue his liberal agenda.”



In the most memorable moment of the speech, when Obama and Democrats in the House chamber demanded that victims of gun violence “deserve a vote” on gun-control measures, Republican leaders stood and looked around but did not applaud.


The reaction was telling, if expected, and it provided a handy visual reminder that for all of the momentum that Obama carries from his November re-election, his agenda faces stiff opposition in the Republican-controlled House.

On a night filled with ritual, the bipartisanship was largely symbolic. Several members of opposite parties chose to sit next together, following the standard set in the 2011 State of the Union address that occurred just weeks after the shooting of then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.).

Sens. Orrin HatchOrrin HatchFroman: Too early to start trade talks with the UK Bacteria found ahead of Olympics underscores need for congressional action for new antibiotics Burr pledges to retire after one more Senate term MORE (R-Utah), Kirsten GillibrandKirsten GillibrandThe Trail 2016: The newrevolution begins Democratic National Convention event calendar Texas rep uses Snapchat to prompt border control discussions MORE (D-N.Y.), John McCainJohn McCainSyria activists cheer Kaine pick Clinton brings in the heavy hitters Guess which Cuban-American 2016 candidate best set themselves up for 2020? MORE (R-Ariz.), Charles SchumerCharles SchumerConvention shows Democrats support fracking, activists on the fringe Dem ad blasts Indiana senate candidate on Social Security The Trail 2016: Unity at last MORE (D-N.Y.) and Lindsey GrahamLindsey GrahamSyria activists cheer Kaine pick Vulnerable GOP senators praise Kaine Meghan McCain: ‘I no longer recognize my party’ MORE (R-S.C.) all sat together in a row, providing for a few amusing moments as the New Yorkers Gillibrand and Schumer tried to prod McCain into applauding policies they backed.

Obama gave McCain, his 2008 nemesis, a big handshake as he walked in, and he yukked it up with Boehner for a brief moment before his speech.

The biggest bipartisan ovations during his address were reserved for the guests he singled out in the gallery, including Giffords and more than a dozen other relatives of victims of gun violence. When Obama pointed out Desiline Victor, a 102-year-old woman who waited more than three hours to vote in Florida, some lawmakers gasped before erupting in applause.

One guest Obama did not point to was the musician Ted Nugent, an invitee of Rep. Steve StockmanSteve StockmanCruz will skip State of the Union Ethics: Lawmakers didn’t ‘knowingly’ break rules with Azerbaijan gifts Lawmakers deny knowledge of secret funding for 2013 trip MORE (R-Texas) who was mobbed by reporters after the speech. While Nugent has made incendiary comments about Obama in the past, he sat quietly through the address.

The reviews, like the applause, cleaved along party lines.

“It was a terrible speech,” said conservative Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho). "He's actually a great speech maker, and I thought tonight was boring. I thought it was disjointed. I thought it lacked focus.”

Labrador, however, gave the president somewhat better marks when it came to immigration, and issue on which he is working with Democrats. “I thought the tone was good,” he said of Obama’s immigration section.

While Democrats cheered the president’s demand that gun-control measures earn a vote, Republicans suggested it was the wrong move.

“We are interested in looking at those areas where we can actually do something,” said Rep. Bob GoodlatteBob GoodlatteCongress leaving for seven-week recess Bipartisan House group to work on police issues House conservatives 'committed' to impeaching IRS chief MORE (R-Va.), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. “Good intentions do not necessarily make good laws, and attempting to stampede members into voting on things that in the past have not shown an ability to prevent some of these tragedies is not the way to go.”

--Mike Lillis contributed to this report.