THE HILL
 

Dems backtrack on single-payer bill

By David Shalleck-Klein - 08/30/09 09:31 AM ET
Some House members who have previously backed a single-payer healthcare reform bill say they will not vote for a similar measure when it hits the floor this fall.

Of the 12 serving House members who co-sponsored Rep. John Conyers’s (D-Mich.) single-payer bill (H.R. 676) in the last Congress but not in this Congress, four have indicated they will vote no on a single-payer bill to be offered by Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.).

The four members are Reps. Joe Baca (D-Calif.), Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas), David Scott (D-Ga.), and Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.).

“It’s a whole new ballgame,” said Baca spokesman Mike Trujillo. “[Baca] supports a public option and not a single-payer system at this time.”

In an interview with The Hill, Scott said, “I support a public option. It’s an excellent compromise and the best vehicle to garner enough votes to pass….Single-payer isn’t going to get the votes. A public option is the best shot we have to lower costs and provide coverage to most Americans.”

Johnson adopted a similar tone in a statement to The Hill: “I have supported legislation like H.R. 676 in the past, but this year I support America’s Affordable Health Choices Act because it has a much better chance of becoming law.”

America’s Affordable Health Choices Act is the lead healthcare reform bill moving in the House.

Reps. Andre Carson (D-Ind.), Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.), Loretta Sanchez (D-Calif.), Betty Sutton (D-Ohio), and James Moran (D-Va.), all previous co-sponsors of a single-payer bill, but not co-sponsors this year, did not comment for this article.

Moran was asked his position on Weiner’s amendment by a constituent during an Aug. 25 town hall meeting.

“I don’t know,” said Moran.  “It will depend on what it takes to get the bill out of the House. Now that the president has endorsed a bill, I'm inclined to support that bill.”

Reps. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) and Laura Richardson (D-Calif.), also past supporters, remain open to Weiner’s amendment but have not made a final decision about whether to vote for it.

The retreat by some Democrats has caught the attention of single-payer advocacy groups.

“It doesn’t represent lack of confidence in single-payer, but more of what kind of assault will come from the extreme right wing,” said Quentin Young, national coordinator for Physicians For A National Health Program.

In late July, Weiner offered a single-payer amendment during the Energy and Commerce Committee markup but withdrew it after both panel chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) promised that his amendment would get a floor vote.

Of the three House committee chairman with jurisdiction on health reform -- Waxman, Rangel and George Miller (D-Calif.) --  only Miller is a current co-sponsor of the Conyers measures.

Waxman cosponsored the measure in the 109th Congress.

It is unclear how Waxman will vote on the single-payer amendment, but hinted he would vote no.

“I will support the bill with the best chance of passing and reaching the president’s desk,” Waxman said when he was asked on Aug. 1 how he would vote on the Weiner amendment.

Democratic leadership is expected to split on the vote. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) is not a cosponsor and neither is Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Chris Van Hollen (Md.).

Van Hollen has never co-sponsored a single-payer bill but said in a letter to Progressive Neighbors in 2008, “I will continue to fight for universal health care and support a single payer approach.”  Van Hollen’s office did not return calls for comment.

Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.), who in past years co-sponsored a single-payer bill but has not formally backed it this year, indicated he would vote yes.

“He’s supported single-payer in the past and he supports it now,” Clyburn spokeswoman Kristie Greco said.

Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.), vice chair of the House Democratic Caucus, is a current co-sponsor of H.R. 676.

H.R. 676 currently has 86 co-sponsors – all Democrats. In the last Congress, the Conyers measure had 93 co-sponsors, and 78 in the 109th Congress.

A single-payer amendment offered by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), which would allow states to set up single-payer systems, passed 27-19 with 13 Republican votes last month during the Education and Labor Committee markup of healthcare reform.

One Democratic aide close to the healthcare debate said, “It would be interesting to know whether the 13 Republicans who voted to pass a single-payer amendment during the House Education and Labor Committee markup plan on supporting Rep. Weiner’s amendment ... Either these 13 Republicans had a serious change of heart or this vote is just further proof that House Republicans are more interested in political gimmicks than working to fix our broken health insurance system,”

Alexa Marrero, GOP spokeswoman for The Education and Labor Committee, fired back: “That vote was a states’ rights issue vote. Rep. John Kline (R-Minn.) [the ranking member on the committee] has not and will not support a single-payer plan ... This is more about Democrats’ inability to form a coherent position on healthcare.”
Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/56785-dems-backtrack-on-single-payer-bill

Comments (8)

Here's a thought: why doesn't the House commission the Congressional Budget Office to do a full scoring and costing out of both HR 676 and HR 3200 — including public *and* private costs — and then compare them head to head? When the Kaiser Family Foundation compared bills in 2008, the single-payer bills offered the most generous benefits and were the *only* ones to result in a net *decrease* in overall spending on healthcare. In other words, single-payer actually *reduced* the percentage of GDP going to healthcare while at the same time offering good universal coverage.Of course, if the CBO actually issued such a report, our representatives would be stuck trying to explain the real reasons they're voting to saddle us with something complicated, weak, and expensive (HR 3200) instead of something simple, effective, and cheap (HR 676). It's much easier to beg the question by saying single-payer isn't politically feasible.As usual, to identify the real reasons, just follow the money — in this case from the healthcare sector to Congress, lobbyists, the media, think tanks, and PR firms. Political decision-making, it seems, is controlled by who can pay the most, not by what the voters want or by what best serves the country.BY Peter -- Seattle on 08/31/2009 at 20:13
This guy is as un-American as one can get, and the best thing for this country is to drive him out of office. He's no good and certainly out to push his own agenda, which desires to remove freedom from our nation. GET HIM OUT!BY Chuck Riley on 09/01/2009 at 10:06
It is troubling to know that H.R. 676 has not received the amount of attention it deserves in the main stream media. I hope more people become aware of this bill. It would be best to slow down our government's ambitions to get any sort of health care bill passed by this Autumn, so that more people get a chance to become better informed about all the different proposals. I thank the efforts of congressman John Conyers, and I hope the best for single payer heath care for the United States.BY agustín j. on 09/01/2009 at 16:41
get it together democrates or are we going to get the republicans wouldnt let us again ..we voted for change .change isnt easy.if its not the right time,what do you want a one party system.i wont vote for anyone who votes no on single payer.im still upset democrates didnt bring impeachment to bush cheny in 06.and free trade is still free for them.the voters did their part in the last election soon youll be asking again .im going to watch this vote on single payer.BY max ryan on 09/01/2009 at 17:08
Anyone who supports transparency and fiscal responsibility should respectfully urge Rep. Conyers to request a scoring of HR 676. There's no way legislators can make a decision on the public option without knowing the cost-benefits of the alternatives.BY Barb C. on 09/03/2009 at 09:41
Democrats have no balls, this is why they lost the whithouse after good economy with BillClinton.Democrats only win after things like, Nixon/Ford to Carter, then to Regan/Bush for colapse of economy, but each time the Democrats due to no Balls then forfit the winning.Now Obama will forfit the rule due to no balls.hey who needs Democrats when republicans allready are the same thing but with balls.I hope healthcare fails if its not Single Payer. FRANCE HA BET HEATHCARE IN WORLD!!!BY Karen on 09/14/2009 at 15:02
We as voters, taxpayer,consum ers, are getting very little information from the advertizer suported media about single payer health plan reform. Is single payer health reform still on the table? It is easy to see that corporate lobby money talks. Obama and the dems have caved in to fear mongers who are themselves afraid of losing their very lucrative stais quo.BY Norman Howe on 09/18/2009 at 09:25
The following is directly from House Resolution 676:SEC. 102. BENEFITS AND PORTABILITY.(a) In General- The health care benefits under this Act cover all medically necessary services, including at least the following:(1) Primary care and prevention.(2) Inpatient care.(3) Outpatient care.(4) Emergency care.(5) Prescription drugs.(6) Durable medical equipment.(7) Long-term care.(8) Palliative care.(9) Mental health services.(10) The full scope of dental services (other than cosmetic dentistry).(11) Substance abuse treatment services.(12) Chiropractic services.(13) Basic vision care and vision correction (other than laser vision correction for cosmetic purposes).(14) Hearing services, including coverage of hearing aids.(15) Podiatric care.(b) Portability- Such benefits are available through any licensed health care clinician anywhere in the United States that is legally qualified to provide the benefits.© No Cost-Sharing- No deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing shall be imposed with respect to covered benefits.BY Stanley Hetz on 09/18/2009 at 19:54

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.