THE HILL
 

Burris, Ensign added to watchdog's most corrupt lawmaker list

By Kevin Bogardus - 09/15/09 10:02 AM ET

Sens. Roland Burris (D-Ill.) and John Ensign (R-Nev.) have been added to a watchdog's annual list of the most corrupt members of Congress.

Burris and Ensign were not the only new people selected for this year's 15-member list, issued by the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). Joining the two senators were Reps. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.), Nathan Deal (R-Ga.) and Pete Visclosky (D-Ind.).

Burris and Jackson have been caught up in a wide-ranging scandal surrounding the alleged selling of President Barack Obama's Senate seat by former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D), who has since been charged by federal prosecutors. Burris has offered conflicting statements on how he came to be appointed to the seat by the disgraced governor, while fundraisers close to Jackson may have tried to buy off Blagojevich for his appointment to Obama's Senate seat.

Along with Burris and Jackson, at least 10 other lawmakers on the list are under investigation, either by the Justice Department, congressional ethics committees or the Federal Election Commission. The list is almost split down the middle between the two parties, with seven Republicans and eight Democrats.

Ensign finds himself on the list due to his affair with a former aide and payments made to her and her husband by the senator's parents. A longtime list resident, Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), is joined by Visclosky due to their ties to the PMA Group, a lobby firm that was raided by the FBI and has since closed down.

The other new addition, Deal, was included because he and aides are alleged to have intervened improperly to keep a no-bid contract with Georgia’s state government in the hands of a business the lawmaker co-owns.

CREW slammed the lawmakers in a statement.

“With the economy in a free-fall, unemployment rates at record highs and healthcare solutions still nowhere in sight, members should be spending their time looking for answers to the nation’s problems, not finding new ways to enrich themselves,” said Melanie Sloan, CREW’s executive director. “The members of Congress profiled in CREW’s Most Corrupt report have betrayed those who voted them into office.”

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/58753-burris-ensign-added-to-watchdogs-most-corrupt-lawmaker-list

Comments (16)

Your article labeling Sen. Ensign is incorrect in listing him as corrupt. He took no money. God gave man Free Will and with that God given ability, people make mistakes. Sen. Ensign, made a mistake, however, he took no monies, as we can not say that for Obama who took more than $338,000 from Fannie Mae and and equal amount from Freddie Mac to stem efforts by the Republicans to impose restrictions on Republicans from pushing legislative oversight actions.So who is truly corrupt? In my personal opinion, as long as we have careerists in both houses of Congress, they get used to having their boots licked and loved the power, and after being in office more than 10 years, they forget, they are employees of their states and tend to act arrogant and expect companies to lavish them with massive gifts, i.e., DODD who should be listed versus Ensign, as Dodd profited fiscally from his actions.But it is ok to make a person who erred in their person life and is making atonement for it, why stealing and obstructing justice, i.e., DOJ's Holder and Obama's collective actions to dismiss charges against the New Black Panther's in last year's election that was captured on national TV in brandishing weapons and using racial slurs against Whites is OK?In addition, how did ACORN ever get the contract which was yanked away this past week by the Senate for having been given a $8.5B contract one month after the bids were closed out? This was Obama who should be listed as the most corrupt.In addition when SF Mayor Kevin Johnson stole funds from the Americorps for his own personal use, he calls Obama and gets the Inspector General fired? So who is more corrupt?Barry Mohamed Soetoro, a.k.a., Barrack Hussein Obama is the most corrupt politician next to DIRTY HARRY of Nevada and Pelosi.BY Jeff on 09/15/2009 at 12:38
Jeff-I haven't fully done the research, but I'm willing to accept at face value a definition of corrupt that doesn't only mean taking money in exchange for favors. How would you describe the behavior of a man who extolls family values, sleeps the wife of an employee (who is herself an employee), and then borrows nearly $100,000 from his parents as a quid pro for moving away from DC and keeping quiet? This article was about corrupt legislators in Congress, so while your list is interesting, tho very incomplete (oddly, it doesn't include the Gov candidate from NJ who flashes his get of jail free card when he is caught running over a motorcyclist while driving the wrong way down a one way street; a poster child for corrupting the rule of law- especially when your get out of jail free card is your status as a US Att'y)… stick with the report. And BTW, Dodd has already been investigated by Congress, and found not to have violated ethics statutes…BY Bruce on 09/15/2009 at 14:31
Okay Jeff, time for you to exercise a bit of free will over your casual relationship with the facts. You might even consider not bearing false witness. Why don't you take a moment and check out CREW's reasons for included Ensign on its list? It's a safe bet that marital infidelity isn't among them.BY Kelly on 09/15/2009 at 14:44
So once again Sen. Burris has an opportunity to do the right thing for the people he represents and once again he fails. He sides with a KNOW corrupt orgination.Acorn. This makes one wonder about him and his connection to Acorn. Time will tell about him as well as the other six who did the same thing.BY Ron Hersey  on 09/16/2009 at 06:56
Jeff,I am on your side with at least some of what you say, but paying off someone to hide the truth is corrupt in my book. Just because others are guilty of something is not evidence that Ensign is NOT guilty of something else. One of the most valid criticisms of the Obama administration is that they attempt to cloud issues with smoke screens about entirely unrelated things. Don't fall into that same habit as it weakens your argument and to anyone with half a brain, it's unconvining.BY Dave in NC on 09/16/2009 at 09:13
One person said Senator Dodd had already been investigated by his Democratic collegues and cleared. Yeah like I trust that. The next time I break some law, I will get my relatives to investigate me and clear me.BY PAUL DRAKE on 09/16/2009 at 09:44
Only the non-Blacks on the list are corrupt. The others are victims of racism. Yeah. We believe that. Really…we do.BY Eric on 09/16/2009 at 09:54
Looking at how the Democrats overlook tax cheats, bribe-takers and obvious racists within their own ranks, It amazes me how gullible people can be to vote these same people back into office. Dallas politics are the same way, if a black man is caught taking bribes he gets voted back into office because it is OK with his constituents. However, if a white man is caught taking bribes his career is effectively over, as he can't be trusted any longer. The disparity amazes me that people can be so blind, and it seems to run pretty much along racial lines. This country is being run into the ground, and our political system is becoming so corrupt that we are not much better than Mexico. And the American people allow it to happen.BY Harold on 09/16/2009 at 11:00
What frightens me MOST about Obama is the worship (and I use that term deliberately) accorded him. You can now purchase Bible-covers with his picture on it (with the appropriate halo-effect behind his head), from actual, otherwise-legitimate Christian bookstores. Don't forget his acceptance mass in Denver last year.Any ordinary person would be embarrassed at receiving such idolatry. But BHO does NOTHING to dissuade such worship, not even the slightest syllable of a self-effacing "Aw shucks, guys…stop it." But far be it from ME to draw parallels between Denver, and Nurnberg. Good heavens no.BY Eric on 09/16/2009 at 11:31
Harold, you wouldn't be referring to ACORN's own John Wiley Price by any means, wouldja? Or would you mean Diane Ragsdale?BY The Crawfish on 09/16/2009 at 12:14

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.