THE HILL
 

Pelosi concerned about potential for political violence like S.F. in the 1970s

By Jared Allen - 09/17/09 11:19 AM ET

A usually steely House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday began to tear up when, in responding to a question about the tone of the national debate, she recalled the politically charged violence that tore through her hometown of San Francisco in the late 1970s.

At her weekly news conference, Pelosi (D-Calif.) was asked if she was concerned about whether the debate over healthcare and the role of the federal government — much of it wrapped in escalating anti-government rhetoric — could lead to acts of violence.

“I think we all have to take responsibility for our actions and our words. We are a free country and this balance between freedom and safety is one that we have to carefully balance,” Pelosi began.

But she then reached back some 30 years, to the very beginning of her career in politics, to recall how heated rhetoric led to the assassinations of San Francisco Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk by a disgruntled former supervisor on Nov. 27, 1978.

“I have concerns about some of the language that is being used because I saw … I saw this myself in the late '70s in San Francisco,” Pelosi said, choking up and with tears forming in her eyes. “This kind of rhetoric is just, is really frightening and it created a climate in which we, violence took place and … I wish that we would all, again, curb our enthusiasm in some of the statements that are made.” (WATCH VIDEO HERE)

Following the press conference, Pelosi aides confirmed that she was referencing the Milk and Moscone assassinations, which coincided with a wave of politically driven violence throughout the city.

Pelosi had been elected Northern California Democratic Party chairwoman on Jan. 30, 1977, launching a career that would make her the most powerful woman in American political history. This past November, Pelosi attended a memorial service marking the 30th anniversary of the assassination of Milk, who was the first openly gay man to win elected office in California.

On Tuesday House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) called the current debate some of the harshest he has ever seen.

“I do believe that there is expressions throughout the country being made that are unusually harsh,” Hoyer said. “And I think the attacks being made on President Obama are unusually vitriolic.”

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/59231-pelosi-concerned-about-potential-for-political-violence-like-sf-in-1970s

Comments (224)

Phony tears - she started out calling Americans who did not agree with Obama NaziBY Barry In Las Vegas on 09/17/2009 at 12:47
Let me get this straight, 1-2 million folks just marched peacefully on DC, made their voices heard, cleaned up after themselves and went home and now Nancy P. is terrified to tears? Give me a break.BY VTConservative on 09/17/2009 at 12:49
Spare me you witch, you ask for ANYTHINg you get. You call us whatever you want and then cry. SHUT UP and take it. You asked for the violence by treating us like crap. If you really wanted to stop it, do your job and listen to the voters, but you make it worse and egg people on. Like I said, you deserve whatever comes your way(in a bad way)!BY Bay Area Patriot on 09/17/2009 at 12:53
The expressions of opposition ARE harsh. Citizens are tired of leaders who don't do their job and pass legislation they don't even read. All of this is about accountability.When you have leaders that put agenda over their constituents wants and needs, this is what happens. Congress needs to LISTEN. People are tired of tax cheats running the IRS, of radicals in all kinds of positions of real power who do not represent the will of the people. The attacks on the president are of his own making. His own arrogance and weak leadership skills bring them to bear. I have never seen a more divisive administration.BY Mark Blackford on 09/17/2009 at 12:57
Hoyer states that the "attacks" on obama are "unusually vitriolic"what about the 8 years of "Bush-bashing'.. a lot of it very racial?.."dumb southerners"BY robert schwalbaum on 09/17/2009 at 12:59
BY Robyn Parker on 09/17/2009 at 13:00
Pelosi Hoyer are full of crap! The attacks launched at Bush were far worse, including by those two. Not that I cared. If he couldn't take it, he shouldn't have signed up for the job. To Pelosi Hoyer, If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen! God knows I would fund your one-way ticket home! On the alternative how about you shut up and listen to the people for once…that is why you have two ears and one mouth…to do twice the listening and ½ the talking! Idiots!BY Brigitte on 09/17/2009 at 13:04
I do believe this unusually harsh rhetoric has been used over and over again by the left (pelosi) for 30 years. What is new is that only the left has been vitriolic, now it's everyone elses turn. They certainly won't to dish it out, but can't take the heat themselves. Please, tears…Give me a break.BY Sharon in Allen on 09/17/2009 at 13:06
No, she actually said this country has free speech? She actually "teared" up? Speaker Pelosi has a responsibility to be concerned, she has used her bully pulpit to name call and accuse and attack. Nowhere else in America are there people that mock the Catholic Church dressed as transsexuals; have the right to fornicate 24/7 in public parks; refuse to obey their own laws. Pelosi's people are the very ones she is afraid of, she saw what they in the l970's…we remember also that is was totally without merit. There is nothing on the planet that allows for death, violence and destruction…nothing, yet that is what is coming from her side. They have been taught to hate so long, I often compare them to the Palestinians who choose death of their children over love.BY Sue on 09/17/2009 at 13:10
Conservatives always type with terrible grammar. Trolls! I think the Nazi, Swastika, and 'Obama African witchdoctor' signs say it all. Keep that racist garbage up, and I guarantee you'll see violence at those pathetic, misinformed 'tea parties.' By the way, the tea party ''movement' is nothing near a real grassroots movement. It is funded by corporate dollars through the group Freedomworks. It's just another way the corporations are rounding up the ignorant mad villagers in order to use them to further their own selfish ends. Truly pathetic and sad. I can't wait for this crap to finally blow over.BY KJ on 09/17/2009 at 13:10

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.