THE HILL
 

Pelosi wants House to pass healthcare bill ‘within weeks’

By Mike Soraghan - 09/21/09 06:23 PM ET

Speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to make final decisions this week on the healthcare reform bill that will hit the House floor, but some centrists in the lower chamber want her to hold off until the Senate Finance Committee acts.


Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) push to decide issues like how to pay for the bill and the shape of the “public option” means that this week will be crucial for healthcare in both chambers.

It also makes it more likely that the House bill will include an income surtax on the wealthy and a public option more to the liking of liberals in her caucus.

“That’s where the caucus is,” said a Democratic leadership aide.

During an event in Philadelphia on Monday, Pelosi said the House will pass a healthcare reform bill “within weeks.”

Jumping ahead of the Senate could irritate Blue Dog Democrats and politically vulnerable lawmakers who don’t want to vote on liberal proposals they see as having little chance of becoming law. Liberals want to counter the Senate Finance Committee’s more conservative-leaning plan.

“I think it would be good to get a marker laid down,” said an aide to liberal lawmaker. “The Senate Finance bill is the low-water mark. No one likes it and it’s only going to get better.”

Aides say Pelosi isn’t trying to get out ahead of the Finance Committee, which begins its markup of the bill Tuesday and could finish as early as Thursday.

She told fellow Democratic leaders at a meeting last week that she simply wants to continue making progress.

“I think she just wants to make decisions and get the process moving,” said a senior Democratic aide.

Pelosi has said repeatedly that she has no timetable for a floor vote on the bill, except that she wants to send a final bill to President Barack Obama by the end of the year. She has also declined to say whether the House or Senate should vote first on their respective versions of the bill.

The Speaker last week publicly reaffirmed her support for the surtax and the public option. In a leadership meeting last week, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) spoke up strongly in favor of the surtax, though he and Pelosi have disagreed on its parameters.

Blue Dog Democrats and other centrists have eagerly awaited the Senate Finance Committee proposal in the hope that it would pull the House plan toward the center.

House Democrats have been holding issue-specific meetings on the healthcare bill, and will continue this week with a Wednesday session on the House bill’s impact on small business and the public option.

Three House committees have each passed a version of the health bill. Committee chairmen and Democratic leaders are in the process of weaving the three together into a single version ready for a vote on the floor. The process will occur largely behind the scenes but could trigger loud fights.

“It could be ugly,” said one lawmaker involved in the process.

The public option and the surtax are two of the most contentious items in the healthcare debate. Republicans despise both, and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) declined to include either in the proposal he’s bringing to his panel this week.

Baucus instead included nonprofit health “cooperatives” to compete with private insurers. And instead of an income surtax, he proposed a tax on insurance companies offering “Cadillac” health plans.

Pelosi has criticized both ideas and the Baucus bill. She has said that the “co-ops” don’t save money and that the excise tax, aimed at plans that cost more than $8,000 for singles and $21,000 for families, will hit the middle class too hard.

 “What is in the Senate bill right now, I think, has too low a threshold and does not have affordability for the middle class,” Pelosi said last week.

But Pelosi is also at odds with many centrists in her own caucus. Blue Dog Democrats are very skeptical of the public option and the $1 trillion price tag of the House bill. Freshman Democrats in the House have led the opposition to a surtax on the wealthy. That revolt caused Pelosi to raise the income threshold to families taking in $1 million or more, but she’s still pushing the idea.

Rangel has proposed a tax on individuals making $280,000 or more a year and couples starting at $350,000.

A group of Blue Dogs struck a deal in the Energy and Commerce Committee in July to walk a middle path on the public option. But Pelosi immediately said she did not feel bound by the deal, and the Blue Dog’s chief negotiator, Rep. Mike Ross (D-Ark.), returned from a spate of August town halls saying he could no longer support any form of public option.


Michael O’Brien contributed to this article.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/59689-pelosi-wants-house-to-pass-healthcare-bill-within-weeks

Comments (24)

pelosi can take a long walk off a short bridge with teddy. We citizens.voter,taxpauers have no more freakin money for your whoremungus spending on governmkent dole. Kill obamacare before it kills AmericaBY jake2 on 09/21/2009 at 20:04
Pelosi needs to take that long walk off the short pier into a very sharp rocky bottom! We need to get her out of the House before she totally bankrupts us along with BO! She should have to worry about where her money comes from and how she will manage to either buy an insurance policy or paying the fine if she can't! She doesn't have to worry as she lives off us taxpayers and her insurance is free because we taxpayers provide it for her! She is so un-American she reeks with it! Wake up and vote her out of the House before she, along with BO totally bankrupts our country!BY clsygrm on 09/21/2009 at 20:37
nancy, you need to get jimmy carter and you twocould co-op on all the ailments to everything. i thinkyou two believe about the same thing. i am worriedabout taking 300b to 500b from medicare. if it's inthat kind of shape then fix it. then you could addcharles rangel to the mix. (he knows about taxes)BY dee walk on 09/21/2009 at 20:49
Is she off her meds again? With all those millions of dollars that she has out of selling wines and with all the illegal inmigrats that work for her, no one can remember to give her Prozac?BY rockus on 09/21/2009 at 21:56
pelosi,reed ,shummer,frank, murtha and sixmore of the top dogs,plus obama should resign.they are not qualified to run his country.he has reniged on the missle defence system,i believe that he is letting our troops down in afgainistan,he is trying to shove this health care on us when fifty two percent dont want it.i,m afraid he is going to let israel down and start kissing iran.i wish that he would just come out and tell america just what is going on in his mind without trying to cover up anything..BY willis on 09/21/2009 at 22:31
B.O. want this health care gov. So he can take over this country.Car,banks,ins. news papers,Every think If they get this ins. Gov.Thell have you income tax and helth. M.Obama she getting in the act too.You better read what she said the other day.B.O. get mad when some ask a quiestion like George S. sunday.He wants tell everone what, what. Like a dictarter.Think about it America.He want to tear down U.S. Just think what he done.BY peg on 09/22/2009 at 00:05
The public option to "Create" competition is a BAD joke!! WE have NO competition NOW. Many states have "1" to three insurance companies monopolising that market.You can jump state lines for auto and other insurance BUT healthcare insurance is "PROTECTED" territory and is controlled for "pricing"stability?? [for those Logic deprived it means low/ NO COMPETITION,per iod] Imagine that we need the public option to provide that which we CAN'T and have not had for years. What would that be called? Lets see , the 1-3 monoply won't compete with a hundred other companies; The one to three,etc. will compete with the public option? and this creates FREE? market pricing and other players Still shutout- no crossing StaTE LINES? VOODOO HEALTHCARE FINANCED AND PRICED how??BY GRO on 09/22/2009 at 01:43
everyone has legitimate concerns but no one seems to care for the 50 mill uninsured. americans have this conception that it is your fault for being poor; so not true.no one is trying to change whats not broke. the plan being pushed may not be the right one but i acknowledge someone trying to do something that those who think everything is just perfect.BY omondi on 09/22/2009 at 05:02
Omondi everyone cares about the so called 50 million that do not have insurance, but, break down this figure to a) the people who can afford it and do not purchase it and b) then to the illegals and c)then the pre-existing conditions.a) 25 millionb 17 millionc 8 millionNow propose that Blue Cross Blue Shield is the company that works for the U.S. Government and they are not allowed to sell their insurance in all 50 states, neither is Atena, Cigna or any other company. So we actually do not have open competition which leads to lower costing policies.Now take into consideration the $200,000 malpractice liability insurance each doctor has to have before he can practice medicine. Does this not raise health coverage cost factors. Then we have juries that award tremendous pain and suffering to people where a doctor has made a mistake. This awards are in the high millions and the lawyers get anywhere from 30 to 50% of what is awarded.Tort Reform is needed across the country to stop these style of law suits and instead a medical board to get rid of the bad doctors.Pelosi is only worried about her power as the Speaker of the House as she cares less about you or I.BY Gene44 on 09/22/2009 at 08:43
what most americans don't get is that most americans that are poor became broke due to medical bills that weren't covered by insurance. if they had gov't insurance, they wouldn't go broke. if they weren't broke, they could afford insurance. You can't really do any worse than the system we already have. Similarly, the idea that reform would cost anything more than what we are doing now only makes sense if you have no clue how healthcare works now (actually, doesn't work now). You can't possibly waste more money than the private system already wastes. Less overhead can only cost less. Preventative care can only cost less than emergency care. Insured people cost less than uninsured people. Private or public, it's still your money paying for the same service - it's just a question of how many middle men you want to make a profit before you actually get treated (or don't get treated!)BY Lee on 09/22/2009 at 10:23

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.