THE HILL
 

House looks at BofA, Merrill Lynch merger

By Silla Brush - 10/05/09 04:10 PM ET

House lawmakers plan to continue their months-long investigation into a controversial deal between Bank of America and Merrill Lynch at the height of the financial crisis, a Democratic aide said on Monday.

At the most tumultuous period of the crisis last September, Bank of America agreed to acquire Merrill. But in December, Bank of America considered pulling out of the deal amid mounting losses at Merrill. The deal eventually went through in January, but the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has held three hearings about the deal and whether federal officials threatened or pressured Bank of America to complete the deal.

House lawmakers had called for a Sept. 30 hearing with officials at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The hearing was delayed, but the Democratic aide said it would be rescheduled.

The hearing was also slated to consider the ongoing court case over a $33 settlement reached between the SEC and Bank of America about bonuses paid to Merrill employees. A bankruptcy judge in September rejected the deal, raising questions about the bank's communications to shareholders about the bonus payments.

House Oversight Chairman Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y), ranking member Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), and subcommittee chairman Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) have led the investigation in the House.

Neil Barofsky, the Special Inspector General over the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), said on Monday that government officials at the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department acted to support the broader financial system and did not find any wrongdoing in their communications with the banks.

Barofsky in his report said they, "acted based on their concerns for the financial markets as a whole." Bank of America received $25 billion from the TARP program as one of the first nine banks to receive aid. The bank later received $20 billion and an asset guarantee from the federal government.

Federal officials believed that if the deal fell apart the financial crisis could be further destabilized. Barofsky's office also concluded that federal officials did not find anything to indicate Treasury and Federal Reserve officials instructed Bank of America executives to withhold public disclosure of the losses at Merrill Lynch.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/61677-lawmakers-delve-into-bofa-merrill-lynch-merger

Comments (3)

Doubtless, given all that BoA has done, an investigation will turn up numerous reasons to pack the whole lot off to jail. If they happen to beat one rap, there are many more to follow.They bought up the Visa card account that I have and needless to say, if the deal for an overseer of credit cards and other financial dealings goes through, they will be hurting big time. Their whole operation is balanced on the thin razor edge of legality and if they take one step too far, they will get what they deserve as they fall with the razor between their legs. For instance, their web site makes it all but impossible to pay the full amount that you owe since they make money if you just pay the minimum. They keep adding "little" charges here and there such as not only do they charge for converting from foreign currency to dollars (at a very favorable rate to them), but they also charge another 3% if you, sitting in your US home, use your credit card to pay dollars to a foreign company like a hotel or airline.BY Texas Aggie on 10/05/2009 at 23:49
there was a recent ruling by the kansas supreme court , that in essence says that when banks buy other banks debts, that the new bank and the debtor no longer have an agreement because the new bank and the debtor don't have a signed contract between the 2. if this holds true, around 60 million mortgages are null and void. along with all the collection agencys. what a way to screw over all the foreign investors who bought this debt hoping to consfiscate america.BY rxgary on 10/06/2009 at 04:36
do you have a link to the ruling? or the party's involved? there was a recent ruling by the kansas supreme court , that in essence says that when banks buy other banks debts, that the new bank and the debtor no longer have an agreement because the new bank and the debtor don't have a signed contract between the 2. if this holds true, around 60 million mortgages are null and void. along with all the collection agencys. what a way to screw over all the foreign investors who bought this debt hoping to consfiscate america.BY rxgary on 10/06/2009 at 04:36BY diesel on 10/06/2009 at 07:36

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.