THE HILL
 

House Dems to call insurance execs twice to testify in final healthcare push

By Jared Allen - 10/09/09 04:44 PM ET

House Democrats will once again call executives of the nation’s largest health insurance companies before Congress to defend their business practices, just as party leaders make a final push for legislation aimed at forcing private insurers to compete with a government-run healthcare program.

Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Chairman Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) will hold a hearing on Thursday, Oct. 15, on the issue of “underinsurance,” what the pair described as the phenomenon of being “insured but not covered.”

No witness list was announced. But Waxman and Stupak have been investigating the practices of the private insurance industry – which the two Democrats believe amount to unfair treatment of consumers and patients – for months, and have already forced dozens of companies to provide volumes of documents on profits, executive compensation, and other practices that Democrats believe illustrate why drastic changes are needed in determining how Americans receive healthcare coverage.

And the two senior Democrats have managed to create a number of uncomfortable moments for the executives called to testify on behalf of their companies.

At a June hearing on “rescissions,” the practice of canceling individual health insurance policies only after policy holders submit claims for costly illnesses, Democrats and Republicans alike grilled executives from companies including United Health and WellPoint – two of the nation’s largest private insurers – for refusing to promise to stop such practices.

“Doesn’t it bother you that people are going to die because you insist on reviewing a policy that somebody took out in good faith and forgot to tell you that they were being treated for acne? Doesn’t that bother you?” the Energy panel’s top Republican, Rep. Joe Barton (Texas), asked at the June hearing. “We’ll back you up on fraud and misrepresentation, but I don’t think you’re going to get a vote, at all, on rescissions that are not material to the claim being processed.”

In numerous speeches across the country, President Barack Obama has retold the stories of some of the very patients who testified before Waxman's panel about retroactively losing their healthcare coverage – or seeing a family member lose theirs – in order to incite support for legislation that would force private health insurers, either by law or through economics, to change many of their controversial practices.

Americans who are underinsured are generally described as having health insurance benefits that fall short of covering their medical expenses. Health experts generally consider a person underinsured if they spend more than 10 percent of their incomes on out-of-pocket medical expenses.

According to a recent study by the journal Health Affairs, some 25 million Americans between ages 19 and 64 were underinsured in 2007, a number that has increased 60 percent since 2003, according to the study, due in part to steadily increasing premiums and copays.

Waxman and Stupak have also been examining closely the profits and executive salaries at the largest insurance companies, and are planning a similar hearing on that issue for the end of October.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/62495-house-dems-to-twice-call-insurance-execs-to-testify-in-final-push-for-healthcare-bill

Comments (14)

how about calling bogus bama and his thugs to tesify under oath about the ill gotten gains in obamacare the foney fraudulent healthcare bill of reid and pelosiBY jake2 on 10/09/2009 at 19:33
jake, where do you get your information?mr obama has not done anything to change the nature of how americans pay for health care coverage, at least not yet, but the problems associated with the for profit, insurance industry are well-documented and numerous.there is no reason american citizens should pay more and get less than everyone else in the modern world when it comes to health care but since it looks as if we won't be getting the best deal we could get out of our government anyway, you have nothing to complain about.for profit, health insurance needs to be replaced with a single-payer system yet the "radicals" you disparage, who are making proposals to change the way we pay for health care, are not willing to cut the for profits out of the picture.it should warm your heart to know that americans will continue to be indentured to the insurance industry, at least in the near future.we wouldn't want to pass any legislation that would promote equality or allow americans more freedom of choice when it comes to where, when, and how long they must work to survive in this country.freedom and equality are evidently ideas which are alien to many americans.BY tim on 10/09/2009 at 22:59
I hope the Senators ask these executives of the Insurance companies if they would be glad to give up their exemptions of the Antitrust Laws of the United States? No other Industry in this country enjoys these government regulations against competition. Amazingly this is why the Insurance companies claim they are against the public option. They do not want competition. Isnt that sweet. Urge your members of Congress to repeal the Antitrust exemption enjoyed by the Insurance Industry, so they have to compete like every other business in this country. I bet if a public option or taking the Antitrust exemption away was the choice, the Insurance Industry would jump at the public option. They are scared to death of competition.BY Kentucky on 10/09/2009 at 23:05
if bogus bama expect to change health care the he , the government employees and Union should be the first to sign up instead bogus bama shoots off his mouth about how good government doles health care is and to hell with the taxpayers/citizens/voters. tim open up your eyes and read about the foney fraudlent bogus bama ACORN healthcareBY jake2 on 10/10/2009 at 00:35
So if we have a CADILLAC health insurance plan with low affordable deductibles, somebody is gonna get taxed 40 percent on it ? so were being forced by the almight knowing one to be underinsured or taxed 40 percent thats screwed up!!!!!!!!!!!!BY ted  on 10/10/2009 at 03:06
Why are these members from congress not disclosing the millions they have collected in contributions from lawyers? Is this why no TART reform? open secrets.orgdisclosures of contributions to every member.BY bailedout on 10/10/2009 at 04:14
Bailedout. That is a great point and should be pretty easy to find out, don't you think? I hope we have all the facts come out before there is a vote.BY Allwaysright on 10/10/2009 at 17:05
McLean, Virginia — Sometimes I wonder whether the greedy, bloodsucking Republicans and their enablers, the "Blue Dog" Democrats, fully appreciate the deep vehemence of the anger and hatred we honest Democrats feel.We will never heal this breech.Paul MatthewsBY Paul Matthews on 10/10/2009 at 21:49
The President and fellow democrats keep trying to tell America that the Republicans don't have a plan but fail to mention that the democrats either refuse to allow their amendments to the floor for discussion or cut them outright from bills in committee. Stop spreading the false statements. Each time Obama spouts off saying Republicans have no plan, Fox news introduces both Congress and Senate members with plans ignored by his party. Maybe why the administration dislikes Fox news so much. If you want to fix the problem, bring the trial lawyers to Washington and attack them for destroying health care, not the insurance companies. I only hope that the insurance executives stand up to you fools this time on live television as this is just another dog and pony show. Allow insurance companies to sell insurance across state line and TORT reform, tackle these two issues then talk to me about reform.BY rogpeck on 10/11/2009 at 00:36
Well if the Senators want to know why the insurance companies cannot compete with the U.S. government it is really very simple. Insurance companies are owned by stockholders and must provide a profit or be forced out of business, the U.S. government insurance coverage is paid for by taxpayers. Who has the most numbers - the U.S. government with 320 million to tax.BY Gene on 10/11/2009 at 03:46

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.