THE HILL
 

Pelosi backs financial protection agency over objections from some Blue Dogs

By Jared Allen - 10/10/09 04:25 PM ET

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is backing the creation of a consumer protection agency ahead of the final round of committee debate on a bill to overhaul the regulation of the financial services industry.

But the Speaker’s endorsement could put her at even further odds with the conservative wing of the Democratic Caucus just as she is grappling with how to win enough of their votes to pass a major healthcare reform bill out of the House.

“Congress is working with President Obama to protect American taxpayers by ushering in an era of honesty, fairness, transparency, and accountability in our financial marketplace and preventing the abusive anti-consumer practices that resulted in the worst global financial crisis since the Great Depression,” Pelosi said in a statement. “We will help achieve this goal by establishing a consumer financial protection agency, whose sole purpose is to protect the financial interests of America’s families.”

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), the chairman of the Financial Services Committee, hopes to complete committee work on his financial regulatory reform bill as early as this week. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said this past week that he could bring the bill to the floor as early as the week after.

Reform of the laws regulating the financial services industry and many of the products they trade privately and on behalf of consumers has been a top priority for Democrats, whose majorities in both the House and the Senate were bolstered after many voters linked last year’s stock market crash to Bush administration policies.

But, just as with healthcare, Democrats do not uniformly agree on the size and scope of new regulations.

Frank has been a leading proponent of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA), originally called for by President Barack Obama, and has already scaled back the scope and reach of an initial CFPA proposal to allay the concerns of the New Democrat Coalition, a large group of centrist, business friendly Democrats.

But some conservative Blue Dog Democrats – the same block that for months has stymied Pelosi’s attempts to pass a healthcare bill with a public option – are backing an alternative version of the financial reform bill that lacks a consumer protection agency.

Blue Dog Rep. Walt Minnick (D-Idaho) prefers the creation of a consumer financial protection council that he believes would accomplish the goal of protecting consumers from predatory lenders and faulty, sham products, but without creating a new bureaucracy or single federal regulator.

Frank will likely be able to pass his bill out of committee over objections from any conservative Democrats, but that could just pit a much larger block of Democrats against the Speaker, who will need to coral the 218 votes necessary to pass the bill.

“Along with robust supervision of financial firms, and strong oversight of their practices, this agency will prevent the egregious abuses that hurt working families, the young and the elderly, and the millions of consumers who entrusted their hard-earned dollars to financial firms that deceived them,” Pelosi said, reaffirming her belief that the CFPA must be part of any financial regulatory reform bill that passes the House.

This story was updated on Oct. 14.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/62537-pelosi-backs-consumer-financial-protection-agency-over-blue-dog-objections

Comments (11)

What does Pelosi or Barney Frank know about Transparency? Didn't they just veto a bill that would have put the Finance committee's Healthcare bill online for 5 days so Americans could read it before its voted on? Well didn't they? Hey Barney and Pelosi, don't tell us Americans about Transparency. You and that loser Obama the Nobel Surrender at all costs prize winner don't have a clue about Transparency. Your all a bunch of hypocrits. foxmuldarBY foxmuldar on 10/10/2009 at 18:43
Honesty and fairness, how sweet they really do care about the people.BY Mr.Balzagna on 10/10/2009 at 19:29
To learn more about the "plain vanilla" mandate and "reasonable disclosure" definition in the House legislation see Riski, the open source platform for financial markets reform:http://freerisk.org/wiki/index.php/Consumer_Financ ial_Protection_ AgencyBY Cate Long on 10/10/2009 at 19:42
The Finance commitee's markups are on line. The bill has not been finalize.It's about time someone addessed this seriously.BY LucasFoxx on 10/10/2009 at 20:28
FOXMULDAR:You might have a modicum of credibility if you learned to read and write. Even so, I doubt it.BY Charles D. on 10/10/2009 at 21:09
These dems couldn't run a laundry mat and where is the oversight for congress. Hypocrites!BY Jim Fitzpatrick on 10/10/2009 at 23:02
I suspect Barney Frank has discovered his "mortality" recently and is scaling back his verbal "bomb-throwing" youthful notions. — However, he hasn't met Reality yet. — What a pity. — There can't be any pity for Pelosi, however. — She is "mob", born and bred. — She's a borderline sociopath and all the plastic surgery in the world won't change what she is fundamentally. — I wonder if the Dems know what they have on their hands? — I think many of the old-timers do know, but they think they can corral her. — I doubt they're right. — She is the most despised person in the entire political spectrum and, yet, she seems to thrive on hatred. — How exactly is this a benefit to the Dems or Obama? — Oh yes, we all know about the Chicago/Unions/Political Thugocracy that gave birth to Obama. — But, under the Klieg lights of national politics, can these thugs, these mad people, really enhance his prospects for the future or his "Presidential Heritage? — Pelosi is a terrible liability. — She is racking up wagons-full of current and future enemies. — Obama studied Marx and Hegel enough to know, the pendulum always swings back. —And, while he has benefited by a "smoke and mirrors" coup d'etat, he must also know there is nothing permanent in this outcome.BY cme on 10/10/2009 at 23:06
We already have to many Government agencies! Not another one. How about a council which is independent of the Government to run consumer protection.BY Elwood Baas on 10/11/2009 at 15:45
An agency to protect us from those evil people that ripped us off? What about some protection from the biggest most incompetent source of all our problems.."you". This all started with a brain child of Carter (CRA). It was exacerbated by Clinton when he mandated Fannie and Freddie hold a portfolio of 50% CRA junk. When they complained, he de-regulated the banks by repealing the Glass-Steagall Act so they could sell off their toxic loans just like investment banks. Then we had the people that were most lining their pockets lying on the floor of Congress (Franks, Dodd, Schumer). They were either lying, or they were totally incompetent and had not a clue what they were talking about. Then, during the time janitors making 30k/yr were buying million dollar homes because you morons paved the way for it…you had ACORN strong arming the Banks and rallying their communities to take advantage of this. Now you want to blame everyone else except yourselves for all this. IN my 50 years on earth, I have never once heard a Democrat take responsibility for their own actions. It's pathetic. Its a disease. Even the morons that did not bother to read their contract and bought homes they could not really afford…are blaming the Lenders, who NEVER would have been in a position to take advantage of these dim-wits in the first place, if YOU had not allowed for it! I am beginning to wonder if you people are severly narcissistic (which was my initial impression), or just PURE sociopathsBY Savant Noir on 10/13/2009 at 11:31
Once this bill goes through, along with health care, I guess I will not have to do any more thinking. The government will tell me what health care insurance to buy, what financial products to invest in and pretty soon what car to buy (since they own the American car manfacturers) and what I should weigh and eat (since the government will administer the health care system). All I have to say is the US government runs the post office (which is broke), Social Security (which is broke) and Medicare (which is broke) and you expect the government to run the health care system and administer financial products - good luck!BY SV on 10/14/2009 at 15:17

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.