THE HILL
 

Lawmakers to tackle key financial reform

By Silla Brush - 10/11/09 07:19 AM ET

House lawmakers will hold markups this week on two key parts of President Barack Obama's proposal to overhaul the financial regulatory system.

The House Financial Services Committee is scheduled to mark up legislation that creates a new federal Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA), which would regulate products such as credit cards and home loans. The committee is also slated to consider legislation that would regulate the multi-trillion dollar market for financial derivatives, instruments widely used to hedge risk.

Both issues have been the center of major lobbying efforts from banks, the wider financial industry and consumer advocacy groups.

The Obama administration, meanwhile, has been ramping up its pressure on lawmakers to pass both pieces of the reform effort. Senior Treasury Department officials, including Secretary Timothy Geithner, held more than ten meetings on Capitol Hill this week to press for financial regulations.

"The patchwork system of regulations we have now has failed to prevent these abuses," Obama said on Friday. "With seven different federal agencies each having a role, there is too little accountability, too many loopholes, and no single agency whose sole job it is to stand up for people."

Lobbyists on the new CFPA agency are focusing on a handful of provisions, and the biggest battle next week will be over the scope of the agency's power. At heart, the battle, which divides Democrats, is over whether the new agency should preempt state and local authorities.

The legislation sets up a minimum federal standard from the new agency but would also allow state officials to pursue stricter or stronger regulations. The industry is lobbying heavily in favor of allowing federal officials to preempt state laws.

Chairman Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) supports the administration, but centrist New Democrats on the committee are in favor of preemption. The issue will likely be the most contentious part of the markup.

Frank had scaled back parts of the administration's original proposal so it did not affect non-financial businesses. Many of those lobbying groups expressed cautious support for the bill after the revised draft was released. But several of those groups have reassessed the bill and oppose it.

The National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA), one of those groups that had expressed initial praise for the revised draft, sent a letter to lawmakers this week opposing the bill unless it is revised. The association criticized Frank's effort to exempt auto dealers from the new agency, saying that it exempts only car brokers and car buying services but not dealers. And the association argued that the exemption for merchants did not exclude auto sales that are financed.

On the derivatives legislation, the financial industry and big banks are working hardest on defining an exemption from clearing for "major swap participants." An SEC official testified this week that the exemption for major participants that use derivatives primarily for "risk management" purposes is overly broad and ill defined.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/62547-lawmakers-to-tackle-key-financial-regulatory-reform

Comments (4)

To see the differences between the Financial Services Committee draft on derivatives, the Treasury version and the Agriculture Committee see here:http://freerisk.org/wiki/index.php/House_derivativ es_2009To see the provisions of the legislation on the CFPA:http://freerisk.org/wiki/index.php/Consumer_Financ ial_Protection_ AgencyBY Cate Long on 10/11/2009 at 09:56
Regulate; To bring order, method, or uniformity. Dear Government, I request that you humbly - ie; "not proud or haughty: not arrogant or assertive"; apply this concept to your duty as a servant of the American public. Hedge this, how can we trust officials who Rangel to levels of self interest/corruption and then have confidence that "We The People" are the focus of your responsibility/concern?BY jadedfellow on 10/11/2009 at 10:10
cheat on your taxes =firing squadA nice bipartisan approach. hey texans would be okay with it.Goes with all lobbyists who don't register too!I like it. a nice bipartisan approach. the pro gunny's would be okay with this.BY Lloyd Chapman on 10/11/2009 at 10:35
Fraud? bullet to the headTax evasion? bullet to the headPutting yourself ahead of your country? bullet to the headcapitalism got you into this mess, fix your sh*t america.BY Lloyd C on 10/11/2009 at 10:36

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.