THE HILL
 

Dems face uphill climb on immigration reform

By Jared Allen - 10/14/09 05:04 AM ET

A small cadre of Democrats on Tuesday continued to push Congress to take up a major immigration reform bill even though the issue has all but evaporated from the majority’s agenda.

At an afternoon rally in front of the Capitol, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.), the chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus’s immigration task force, said an immigration overhaul is long overdue.

“We simply cannot wait any longer for a bill that keeps our families together, protects our workers and allows a pathway to legalization for those who have earned it,” Gutierrez said.

Hopes for action on legislation to create a pathway to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants have steadily eroded since President Barack

Obama twice delayed a White House immigration summit and his attention became all but monopolized on healthcare reform.
Gutierrez, who has questioned Obama’s commitment to the issue, on Tuesday said: “It is time we had a workable plan making its way through Congress that recognizes the vast contributions of immigrants to this country and that honors the American Dream.”

At the same time, however, even Gutierrez has yet to introduce a bill.

The Illinois Democrat has been intent on including as many Republican-friendly provisions as he can swallow in order to attract some GOP support, and the plan he outlined on Tuesday includes provisions for enhancing border security and employment verification systems, both of which he said will reduce illegal immigration.

But it remains unclear whether any Republicans will step out to support immigration reform after a 2007 bipartisan effort collapsed under the stress of conservative criticism.

While the issue no longer dominates the conservative airwaves, it remains a political lightning rod for many on the right. The now-infamous “You lie!” outburst of Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) came in response to Obama’s pledge that no illegal immigrants will be covered under the government-funded portion of his healthcare plan.

For the time being, Democrats seem to be the more immovable obstacle.

Democratic Caucus Vice Chairman Xavier Becerra (Calif.), the only Hispanic member of the House leadership team, said the urgency for immigration reform hasn’t subsided, but acknowledged that it has been overshadowed by more pressing matters.

“There’s a daily urgency,” Becerra said. “The stories continue to come out about children who are separated from their parents, people dislodged from their workplace that they’ve been in for over a decade … The drumbeat hasn’t diminished one bit.”

He suggested a busy House calendar is part of the problem.

“What we have found,” Becerra continued, “is that we’re encountering calendar issues with some of these big, heavy, but very important policy issues that we’re confronting … It’s just a matter of finding the space on the calendar when you deal with the economy, jobs and healthcare.”

Yet the House schedule in recent weeks has shortened.

House leaders have slashed a number of Mondays off of the upcoming legislative calendar, and have long since abandoned Fridays as days when the House meets to consider legislation.

With the House unable to reach a consensus on its own approach to healthcare reform, and with a number of Democrats wanting to wait even longer for the Senate to finish its bill, leaders have been struggling to find enough reasons to keep members in town for four days at a time.

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) said immigration reform could come after healthcare, but acknowledged the more likely possibility was for leaders to put it on next year’s agenda.

Proponents of comprehensive immigration reform like Schakowsky and Gutierrez had pressed for action in Obama’s first year, knowing that the emergence of an issue like immigration in an election year could make GOP support unattainable and also spell trouble for conservative Democrats.

Forced to scratch their original game plan, immigration reform backers are now hoping that Republicans in states with significant percentages of Latino voters will feel pressure to support, rather than shun, a pathway-to-citizenship bill, and that a reform bill will earn enough GOP support to offset the likely significant defections from Southern Democrats.

“We’ll see how controversial it ends up being,” Schakowsky said. “There are lots of Republicans in districts that, if not now, will soon be relying on citizen immigrants to reelect them.”

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/62961-democrats-face-uphill-climb-on-immigration

Comments (69)

This will not be addressed until a health care bill is passed. The Democrats don't want you to know that once the Health Bill is passes that then they will give some 20 million illegals free health care at your expense. Of course they won't be illegal anymore after they give them citizenship and social security benifits.This is 20 million votes bought for the Democratic party. Nice huh?BY Larry on 10/14/2009 at 08:31
Although the 1986 amnesty resulted in 2.7 million illegal's being legalized, over 10 million were actually legalized after they brought their extended families over.The 1986 Act was not enforced, illegal immigration exploded out of control. So here we are again with plans to pass another giant amnesty for 12-20 million illegal aliens and their extended families, another 48-80 million.Why would Obama and Congress want to makes things even worse on America's 14.5 million unemployed?The administration could easily create 7.5 million jobs in manufacturing, construction and service industries simply by enforcing the existing immigration laws.A side benefit would be to return the 7.5 million SSN's being used fraudulently by illegal aliens to their rightful owners. Those who come here illegally, steal our IDs and ignore our laws have already demonstrated they lack the honesty and decency to ever become American citizens. a.) Enforce the existing immigration laws.b.) Secure the border.c.) Don't hire illegal aliens.d.) No anchor babies.e.) Deportation through attrition.BY Bob White on 10/14/2009 at 10:02
A lot of liberals assume that having "legal" latinos (such as me) in an area leads to overt sympathy to "illegals" that threaten this great nation's economy and social fabric. They are dead wrong, those of us (millions) whose hispanic ancestors stood in line and entered this nation legally and then cherished their "earned" citizenship have NO sympathy for those unwilling to follow the same steps and make the same sacrifices. Do NOT confuse a Spanish surmane with a soft outlook in how to best handle ILLEGAL immigration.BY Dr. M on 10/14/2009 at 10:08
"Pathway to citizenship" is such a clumsy way to say "amnesty." The pathway to citizenship leads back to the place where you're a citizen. For most of them, that means southward. Start walking, guys, and don't stop until you're a citizen of the place you are.BY Eggy on 10/14/2009 at 10:39
Until illegal immigration ceases to be profitable, it will continue. Washington, pro-illegal supporters, anti-American groups,individu als who hire illegals and churches all profit whether it be with votes or some form of "appreciatin. So, we Americans sit and watch out country being destroyed before our eyes. Just remember who is doing this and vote them out. The invasion could be stopped in a very short time with a few measure. The problem is no one has the courage to stand up for us. It's just not politically correct any longer to be patriotic or care for one's country. The new "world order" proclaims it racists or un-American if we don't sit back and let the world invade. This country is doomed if the situation continues.BY June on 10/14/2009 at 10:53
Mr. Gutierrez claims that his bill would include "worker verification" but Democrats have already been shying away from permanently authorizing and funding eVerify. So, why should we believe he and others would suddenly do anything differently if they got the amnesty they want—any more than happened after the 1986 with its promise of enforcement? I'm a Democrat, as is my brother who is married to a Mexican-American. Neither of us want amnesty.BY Ali on 10/14/2009 at 11:11
How do these supposed to be AMERICAS REPRESENTATIVES LIKE GUTIERREZ AND MANY MORE IN OUR AMERICAN SENATE AND FEDERAL GOVERMENT?HOW DO THEY GET THE TIME ON AMERICAN TAXPAYER MONEY TO WORK STRICKLY FOR MEXICO BISINESS? DOES MEXICO SEND MONEY OVER TO PAY THESE PEOPLES SALARIES AND BENEFITS? I BET NOT IF NOT FREE MEXICO DONT WANT IT.WHEN DOES MEXICO START PAYING FOR ITS INVASION? AN AMERICAN>BY garyrose on 10/14/2009 at 11:36
I agree with Dr. M's comments. I, like millions of others have a Spanish surname who can trace family's roots in this countgry to the 16th Century. These Spaniard settlers settled in Southwestern USA hundreds of years before there were countries like Mexico, a Central America or even an American government. To be lumped as a 'Latino' just because of my last name is ludicrous and an insult. It also shows ignorance by our own media for not recognizing that there are other Latin citizens in this world, like from France or Italy. These so called 'Latinos' who rabble rouse on immiration just want to further their agenda to help their Central American illegal relatives. For those not familiar with history, there was no interference to Spanish settlements during the twenty five year under Mexican government except to take an annual census and impose taxes to help their flegling government. They did not see any threat from Spanish families. Question: If these highly vocal groups who legislate to help illegal immigrants are Mexican and they are legal immigrants, why do they call themselves Latinos?? Are they not proud of their Mexican heritage? Or do they think they can do more in achieving their goals on immigration if they call themselves latinos? I for one am proud of my Spanish roots, but I'm also a very proud American who has served his country in time of war.BY Herb on 10/14/2009 at 11:36
A comprehensive immigration reform is a matter of when, not if. And it is the right, just, and humane thing to do! Racism always loses in America and the immigration reform stuggle is the most important civil rights struggle of our time.BY Ivan on 10/14/2009 at 11:49
It is just unbelievable that insensitive proponents of "comprehensive immigration reform" a/k/a MASS AMNESTY, are pushing to amnesty millions of illegal foreign workers when unemployment in the U.S. is the highest in decades! And NO one is fooled by Gutierrez's weak border enforcement provisions. The answer remains: NO FORM OF ANY AMNESTY — WE DEMAND THAT OUR IMMIGRATION LAWS ARE ENFORCED AND ILLEGALS REMOVED THEIR ILLEGAL JOBS!BY StanleyG. on 10/14/2009 at 11:52

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.