THE HILL
 

Howard Dean claims that some Blue Dogs may back public option

By Reid Wilson - 10/22/09 10:46 AM ET

While conservative Democrats in Congress are staying vague, one liberal organization is claiming several Blue Dogs will back a public option in the House's version of a healthcare bill.

Democracy for America, the group headed by former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean (D), claims support for a public option from 220 members of the House and 51 senators.

Dean, the former chairman of the Democratic National Committee and a physician by training, has pushed hard for a robust public option in the healthcare overhaul that comes out of Congress. After being passed over for a position in the Obama administration, Dean returned to his organization to pressure members of Congress from outside Washington.

But a number of the members from whom he claims to have support have remained mum publicly. And some, including several members of the Blue Dog Coalition, openly oppose a public option.

Among the members from whom Dean claims to have support is Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-S.D.), a co-chairwoman of the Blue Dog Coalition who has said the public option would be bad for physicians.

The National Republican Congressional Committee pounced on Dean's list, claiming it would give them ammunition to attack several vulnerable Democrats in next year's elections. Democratic Reps. John Boccieri (Ohio), Bobby Bright (Ala.), Kathy Dahlkemper (Pa.), Steve Driehaus (Ohio), Debbie Halvorson (Ill.), Betsy Markey (Colo.), Jerry McNerney (Calif.), Mark Schauer (Mich.) and Harry Teague (N.M.), all of whom are on the list, face tough reelection prospects.

"These Democrats who are on record supporting a government takeover of healthcare are now at serious risk of having their seats be taken over by a Republican challenger. If [House Speaker Nancy Pelosi] has the votes, why not put everyone on record now?" taunted Paul Lindsay, an NRCC spokesman.

But not every member Dean says is with him actually backs a public option. Bright told The Hill in a recent interview he opposes it, but that he has not ruled out backing a measure that more closely resembles the Senate Finance Committee bill. Asked whether Bright's support has shifted in recent days, spokesman Lewis Lowe reiterated Bright's earlier position.

"I don't know where [Dean's group is] getting it from," Lowe said. "He's definitely opposed to the public option."

Others are similarly perplexed by the website. Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.), another Blue Dog, "has not taken a position for or against it yet," spokesman Mike Jensen said in an e-mail.

Teague told the Albuquerque (N.M.) Journal last month that he does not believe a public option is necessary. His spokeswoman said Thursday that Dean's organization had never contacted the congressman's office about healthcare reform.

Mary Rickles, a spokeswoman for Dean's organization, said the organization had relied on a whip count from FireDogLake, a liberal blog that backs the public option, and from calls Democracy for America members and supporters made to their representatives. Those calls were fact-checked by the organization.

But, Rickles said, some members of Congress were inadvertently placed on the wrong list. Democracy for America is correcting Bright's entry, for example.

Meanwhile, some say they support a public option only if certain tough conditions are met. Markey supports a public option, she told the Greeley (Colo.) Tribune in late August, only if it is operated as a nonprofit, receives no government subsidies and costs nothing. Halvorson would support a public option not tied to Medicare.

Zack Pohl, a spokesman for Schauer's office said the freshman Democrat "believes health insurance reform should include a robust public option to promote competition, hold insurance companies accountable, and lower costs for consumers."

Rickles said even with the new edits, Dean's organization is confident a public option will pass.

"The majority of Americans say that they want [a public option], and we still have a majority of the people in the House and Senate who want it," she said. "If members of Congress vote for what their constituents support, then I think we'll get a robust public option in the end."


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/64287-dean-claims-blue-dog-support-for-public-option

Comments (13)

A public option is a done deal, right or wrong, save money or spend more it doesn't matter. Nor does it matter what the public thinks (even though a great majority is uninformed). This is a quest to push a ideology and nothing more with the ultimate goal of a Medicare program for all.On the journey toward "reform" we have missed shooting for the true goal of reform, we have misled on costs and assumption, we have blamed only the easy targets and we are going to substantially increase costs along the way.Sad, but true. My latest assessment is on my blog, take a look and keep in touch if you have an interest.http://quinnscommentar y.com/category/healthcarehealt hcare-reform/BY Dick Quinn on 10/22/2009 at 12:43
Howard speaks off the cuff fairly consistently.Glad to see he can count eggs, but it's way to early to plan a chicken dinner.Howard must be feeling ignored after being caught speaking out of both sides of his mouth by Fox. He's well on his way to becoming the post child for 'third rails', not to be trusted.BY KstJay on 10/22/2009 at 12:44
Contrary to your headline, there has been Blue Dog support for a public option for months now. This is not news. The question is the extent of that support.Jane Harman, Sanchez, Dahlkemper, Giffords, etc., have all long ago come out in favor of some type of public option.BY Kevin on 10/22/2009 at 12:53
This story is trash. I was never called by the Hill, I have never done a whip count, and I have never had a conversation with most of the named Members.BY Howard Dean on 10/22/2009 at 13:25
BTW, according to your headline "Howard Dean claims that some Blue Dogs may support the public option"He said **may** not will!!! I see the media is twisting his words again!!BY Jerry on 10/22/2009 at 13:42
SHAME ON YOU "THEHILL"BY lifecoaches on 10/22/2009 at 13:42
*****This story is trash. I was never called by the Hill, I have never done a whip count, and I have never had a conversation with most of the named Members.BY Howard Dean on 10/22/2009 at 13:25 *****Is this really Howard Dean?BY Jerry on 10/22/2009 at 13:51
Yes it is really me. I don't like misinformation any better than I did in 2004.BY Howard Dean on 10/22/2009 at 14:24
**Yes it is really me. I don't like misinformation any better than I did in 2004.BY Howard Dean on 10/22/2009 at 14:24***We are behind you 1000% Dr. Dean!!By the way we have www.HowardDeanforPresident.com and www.HowardDeanin20012.com for you in case you feel the need to run! [It's getting re-routed to www.DemocraticWarrior.com for now.] We would be eternally honored and grateful if you signed up!!BY Jerry on 10/22/2009 at 14:37
While Governor Dean, who is an independent consultant for DFA, is very involved in DFA's healthcare fight and continues to work directly with our members in the fight for a strong public option, he is not involved in the day to day work of the whip count or the confirmations on where specific members stand. Just as Governor Dean is also not responsible for NYCeve's blog content on www.StandWithDrDean.com either. We at DFA continue to keep our whip count as update as is possible with the ever changing dynamics of this very important issue and upcoming votes. However, this being Congress, we understand that some members may not always be consistent with their public statements about this issue - particularly when they come under direct mail attacks from the Republican National Committee.Whip counts are not final tallies, they are a snapshot of where we're at… not a static statement. Otherwise it wouldn't be called whipping… it would be called voting. So even as we continue to verify answers and re-confirm positions, DFA stands by our count. We have the votes needed to pass a public option by majority votes… now it's up to Congress to get the job done.The good news is that House leadership backs up our whip count today with a count of 218 for a public option… in fact, they say they have the votes for a Robust Public Option (based on Medicare Plus 5). You can see posts reporting this here: http://www.openleft.com/diary/15644/victory-confirmed-house-has-the-votes-for-medicare-5-public-optionand here: http://politicalwire.com/archives/2009/10/22/daily_pulse_house_democrats_line_up_votes.htmlBY Charles Chamberlain on 10/22/2009 at 14:59

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.