THE HILL
 

Hoyer: House Dems on the verge of bringing healthcare bill to the floor

By Jared Allen - 10/27/09 10:30 AM ET

House Democrats are days, if not hours, away from introducing the healthcare bill that will make it to the floor, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said Tuesday.

The No. 2 Democrat in the House said it was the objective of Democrats to introduce their final bill this week so that it can be voted on next week.

“That would be our objective, because it’s our objective because we want to consider this bill next week, and we pledged to give 72 hours notice, so we need to roll out the bill this week,” Hoyer said.

What the bill looks like remains unclear. Unlike Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who on Monday announced that the final Senate bill would include a public option with an opt-out provision for the states — an announcement Reid made before pocketing the 60 votes he would need to pass such a bill — the House’s strategy has been to search for a formula that will generate 218 Democratic votes ahead of time.

A whip operation that began in earnest last week to pin members down on their support for a public option tied to current Medicare rates versus one that allows doctors and hospitals to independently negotiate their reimbursement rates continued over the weekend and spilled over into this week.

On Friday Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) indicated an openness to a public option with negotiated rates, especially if the Senate includes some kind of public option in its legislation.

Hoyer said that the “overwhelming majority of Democrats” support a public option, but he again gave no hints as to which version is generating a critical mass of support.

Asked how many additional healthcare votes Democrats are likely to win with a negotiated-rates public option, Hoyer replied: "We don’t have that number yet.”

Pelosi has stood by her personal preference for a public option tied to “Medicare plus five percent,” saying that the Congressional Budget Office has preliminarily scored it as the biggest cost-saver.

But she asked the CBO to produce more complete scores on both versions. House leaders, as well as important blocs of Democrats in the House, continue to wait for those scores.

A Hoyer aide said Tuesday that CBO scores would be due before leaders could introduce their final bill.

With the debate on healthcare reform heating up, Democratic leaders are ramping up their floor schedule. House Democratic leaders have conveyed to their caucus that they will keep the House in session as long as necessary to pass healthcare reform legislation.

House members have been advised that the lower chamber is expected to be in session Monday through Friday next week, and there could be weekend votes. On Monday, there will be no votes until 6:30 p.m.

On Tuesday, the House is scheduled to convene with the Senate for an address from German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

The House will also be in session from Monday through Friday during the week of Nov. 16 and there could be votes on Nov. 23 and 24.
  

Mike Soraghan contributed to this article, which was updated at 2:35 p.m.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/64941-house-dems-on-verge-of-bringing-health-bill-to-floor

Comments (12)

The Congressional Budget Office only answers the questions it is asked. Not many Americans can hope for a 15.6% a year pay raise similar to the one considered for private health insurance companies - no questions asked. Only one Bill under consideration would require health insurance plans to get government approval before increasing premiums by more than one and half times medical inflation.On the surface that would appear to rein in premiums.The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that medical prices rose at an annual rate of 3.6 percent annually for the three months ending in June. If that rate of annual medical cost increase were to continue, health insurance companies could increase the price of each health insurance policy up to 5.4% (3.6×1.5=5.4) in such a year without government approval.  For example:If an insurance company were required to have a medical loss ratio of 85%, it would pays $850,000,000 on medical costs for $1,000,000,000 of premium income, and has $150,000,000 left for expenses and profits.  If prices were to rise, as they have so far this year by 3.6%, the insurance company’s payments for claims might rise to  $880,600,000 ($850,000,000 x .036 = $880,600,000).Meanwhile the insurance company could raise its premiums by 5.4% (3.6% x 1.5%) without government approval to $1,054,000,000. If it kept a 85% medical loss ratio, it would pay out $880,600,000 on medical claims and have $173,400,000 left for expenses and profits.  This is a raise of $23,400,000 or 15.6% to the insurance company for expenses and profits. ($173,400,000 - $150,000,000 = $23,400,000 ÷ $150,000,000 = .156×100 = 15.6%).Is the Congressional Budget Office being asked for cost estimates for the lack of controls on how much of our subsidized premiums will go for health care and how much private health insurance companies can raise premiums?BY Helen Northmore on 10/27/2009 at 12:36
Are these people brain dead. No one wants there crap health care bill. Defy the voters Blue Dogs and 2010 will not be a good year for you. I do not need to be a fortune teller to be sure you are all in trouble if you back Pelosi and Hoyer. The voters will fight back at the ballot box. I do not think the Democrats have outlawed elections, but who knows that may be next on the agenda.BY Odie  on 10/27/2009 at 12:56
Correction to typo in comment BY Helen Northmore on 10/27/2009 at 13:03
OK Steny, we know the voters in Maryland are owned by the government, working in DC and all. That's why you are in the House. Voters who are not beholden to the government or on the dole will be cleaning house in 2010. You may survive, to America's dismay and disadvantage, but the landscape in DC will change.BY Jimmy Knuckles on 10/27/2009 at 13:22
Oh boy, can't wait to see who will get scewed next.BY PL on 10/27/2009 at 13:45
Is the House voting on a "BLANK CHECK"? Where's the actual written bill? Is it posted online someplace for all Americans to see and read?BY FRANK COLLATT on 10/27/2009 at 14:20
Harry Reid doesn't have 60. Leiberman has opted out.BY ikaye on 10/27/2009 at 14:41
So many of these so called high and mighty on Capitol Hill believe they have the best health care system going,obviously they have not read through the FEHB budget lately.They would find that they are on fire at about the rate of 8 to 13 %/year and they're telling us we need a government option.There is not one of our elected officials that want to see a government run option in their own program,they would rather see the public sector help pay for theirs.BY Rick C on 10/27/2009 at 14:42
Dems are in a hurry now since the tide is turning against them again. Rahm it through and watch the dominos fall in the next election!BY Elwood Baas on 10/27/2009 at 14:59
If the government is so hell bent on owing a healthcare insurance company, why don't they sell stock to all the congresspersons and let them own it. They could then cover everthing. The only thing is that they could not get backing or financing from the taxpayers. It would also be non-profit. Any takers?BY PL on 10/27/2009 at 15:35

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.