THE HILL
 

Barney Frank eyes new government powers to end 'too big to fail'

By Silla Brush - 10/27/09 05:19 PM ET

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, circulated legislation on Tuesday that aims to prevent future bailouts by giving the federal government new powers to deal with failing financial firms.

The legislation attempts to resolve one of the most controversial questions of the overhaul of the financial system: the problem of “too big to fail.”

The legislation gives new power to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to extend credit or other obligations to solvent firms if they threaten the financial system. Such resolution authority would require the written approval of the Federal Reserve and FDIC and the written consent of the Treasury Secretary.

Firms with less than $10 billion in assets would not be assessed by federal regulators under the legislation. The legislation would levy a much heavier burden on the nation's top roughly 115 financial firms than the thousands of smaller community banks that have argued they did not cause the financial crisis.

The Obama administration and congressional allies have been pushing for new powers to regulate “systemic risk” and wind down massive financial firms that threaten the broader economy. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said this is one of the most important aspects of the regulatory overhaul and that the government should not be in position in the future of having to seek bailout money from Congress.

But the debate has been highly controversial because it implicates the future role of the Federal Reserve. Democrat and Republican critics have argued that the central bank was lax in its regulation of major American banks in the run-up to the crisis and should not necessarily be granted additional power to regulate systemic risk.

The legislation calls for a new Financial Services Oversight Council in the federal government to monitor systemic risks.

The council would comprise the heads of the nation’s bank regulators and would be chaired by the Treasury Department, not the Federal Reserve, Frank’s office said on Tuesday.

The council would identify firms that pose a threat to the financial stability of the broader economy and could require that those firms be subject to heightened oversight. The council would not be considered a federal agency under law and would also not be subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

The legislation would also give the Federal Reserve specific power to regulate firms for financial stability. The central bank would be required to review firms’ leverage limits, liquidity, risk-based capital requirements and other measures.

“The Fed will have back-up authority to step in if regulators do not act quickly to address developing problems identified by the council,” the committee said in a statement.

The central bank would also have the power, when it reviews firms, to require financial holding companies to “sell or otherwise transfer assets or off-balance sheet items to unaffiliated firms.” The central bank could also require that the firms terminate certain activities or impose other conditions.

The legislation would also preserve the federal charter for thrifts -- savings and loans firms -- but would shift all the current powers of the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

Lawmakers have come down hard on the OTS for regulatory lapses over many of the nation's largest mortgage lenders whose failures spurred the housing market crash. OTS also had oversight of American International Group (AIG) at the federal level.

Frank's bill would also mandate existing non-banks, industrial loan companies and other similar companies that engage in commercial activity to create a bank holding company. The legislation would ban any new commercial firms from owning a bank, industrial loan company or holding a specialty bank charter.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/65049-frank-eyes-new-government-powers-to-end-too-big-to-fail

Comments (16)

I hope the legislation can do what it set out to do because there seem to be many critics: http://www.newsy.com/videos/congress_and_obama_mull_too_big_to_fail_policyBY Stephanie on 10/27/2009 at 18:48
Hey i have a novel idea…Bawnie Fwank…just let them fail…let them go under let them die…i cant wait until you are tried for your acts of treason and trechery frank…you and yer buddy Chris Dodd will be sharing a 5×5 together,to bad we dont do what they used to do in the early days of our nation.it would be a great day to see you scumbags swingin from a tree or sent to hell from a firing squad for your deeds…when the conservatives win it back you will be tried…and found wanting.screw us while you can.BY Tranzwarr on 10/27/2009 at 19:43
I am glad there is a God because I need him everyday to help me to with serenity. I have some very strong reservations about this legislation. I am not in favor of bailing out financial institutions or major companies who have not learned how to manage their corporations. If you don't know what you are doing then you just have to pay the price and if that is bankruptcy so be it. This legislation gives the Federal Reserve bank the authority to fund "to big to fail" companies which is way too broad of a statement. I know they are using a criterion of 10 Billion as a threshold but who is to say that doesn't change. I don't trust the federal government as far as I can throw them. If you are a 10 Billion dollar business and you are going under that is an organizational problem not a government problem. The federal government in not a for-profit organization and should stay out of trying to make money by controlling companies regardless if we provided financial assistance. If a congressman or president feels that we need to provide financial assistance then let them stand by their vote and prepare for the consequences. This is truly unconstitutiona l. My question is where is the Judicial Branch because they are the third in line as it relates to checks and balance of what is constitutional and what isn't. If they can't do there jobs then maybe we as the people need to pursue our constitutional right and call a constitutional convention to amend the constitution as stated in Article V. Two amendments that I would propose are term limits and exempting the social security fund as part of general revenue for the federal government to dip their hands in. I can also support that Supreme Court appointees have to be elected with term limits. I know I am rambling but I stand up for the unjust and abused and our people are being abused and neglected by the lack of ethical representation.Andrew “Cas” CastanuelaCandi date for U.S. SenateBY Cas for Senate on 10/27/2009 at 22:53
Who will watch Barney ? Who will oversee the Fed. Reserve ? I agree with Cas..term limits and we want a retirement age.The new slogan: End organized crime. Re-elect No One.BY AnnieG on 10/27/2009 at 23:23
What a guy this Barney Frank.I can see why the FDA did such extensive research on putting a warning label on franks and came to the conclusion the only warning label needed was on the ''Barney Frank''.BY Rick on 10/28/2009 at 04:09
How ironic..Barney helped cause the financial mess with mortgages and he has a new plan to shaft us one one time…Who is monitoring Barney?BY bailedout on 10/28/2009 at 04:47
It would be comical if it was not so sad to see a man like Barney Frank running anything… I would not let him run any buisness… Not even as a used car salesman.. The guy is a utter baffoon.. His day will come when he spends time in jail for his addition to the destruction of the countries financial system. He likes to blame Bush.. It was not just Bush.. It was elder Bush, Clinton, Bush jr, Obama, Dodd, Frank.. This is NOT something that just happened in 4 or 8 years.. It was stupid policy after stupid policy, and Franks name is ALLLLL over it. He is a clown, nothing but a utter clown twit. His talk down speak to anyone that says anything he doesnt like is mearly smeared by him, and put down as if he is some genius.. To bad his genius brought our country to its knees… MORON!BY Steve on 10/28/2009 at 06:34
When these commies finnally get thrown in jail for life for treason Barney should be sent to a womens prison. A mens jail would be like a candy store for him.BY Pete on 10/28/2009 at 08:53
Barney must go, along with Dodd and all the other liars and crooks in Washington!BY bobc on 10/28/2009 at 09:00
Frank has a lot of nerve. Isn't he one of the ones that cause housing crisis? He needs to be VOTED OUT.What is WRONG with the people in MASS..Him and Dodd and the rest of the crooks need to go.This goes for Dems and the GOP.BY Dale on 10/28/2009 at 09:33

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.