THE HILL
 

Anxious CEOs criticize inclusion of any public option in healthcare reform bill

By Jeffrey Young - 10/28/09 09:36 AM ET

Any kind of government-run health insurance program would lead to higher costs for employers, corporate executives representing a big-business group said Wednesday.

The Business Roundtable, an alliance of corporate CEOs, criticized the public option in a conference call with reporters as congressional Democratic leaders intensified their push to include a government plan in their healthcare reform bills.

“We’re here to voice our strong opposition,” said John Castellani, the president of the Roundtable.

“This week, the Senate healthcare reform effort took a wrong turn,” said Antonio Perez, the chairman and CEO of Eastman Kodak Co. who chairs the Business Roundtable’s Consumer Health and Retirement Initiative.

Although the health insurance industry’s opposition to the public option has received the most attention, business and healthcare groups are practically unanimous in their opposition and have been since the beginning of the debate.

Now that Congress is inching closer to final action, business groups are stepping up their messaging campaigns. The business community has become increasingly anxious as the prospects for the public option have improved on Capitol Hill.

The Business Roundtable’s chief argument against the public option is that a government plan would offer lower payments to medical providers who, in turn, would raise the rates they charge for patients enrolled in employer-sponsored health insurance plans.

“It won’t contain costs. It will just shift them to the private payers,” Castellani said. “The state opt-out provision does nothing to blunt that impact.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) shifted the healthcare reform debate leftward on Monday when he announced that the bill heading to the Senate floor would include a public option. Reid settled on a compromise version that would allow states to opt out, winning over a handful of centrist Democrats but losing Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe (Maine) along the way.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is also reportedly close to rounding up the votes she needs to include a nationwide public option in the lower chamber’s bill. According to Congressional Budget Office estimates, the public option would lower the cost of healthcare reform and attract as many as 10 million enrollees.

Reid’s proposed compromise did not satisfy business and insurance groups. Perez said it would take a “miracle” for Congress to devise a form of public option that corporate America could support.

The Senate Finance Committee approved a bill this month that did not include a public option but Reid decided to favor a separate measure passed by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee on the issue.

While the Finance Committee legislation was “not perfect,” Perez said, it “provided a bold framework that we liked for healthcare reform.”

Unlike the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which is rolling out television ads to fight the public option, the Business Roundtable plans no so campaign. “We will rely primarily on the face-to-face visits [and] the phone calls” between corporate CEOs and lawmakers, Castellani said.

Verizon Communications Chairman and CEO Ivan Seidenberg, who chairs the Business Roundtable, said the group’s members would keep pushing their agenda. “We don’t believe the process is over — far from it,” he said. “We’re going to start with this call and we’ll go from here.”

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/65161-anxious-ceos-criticize-any-public-insurance-option

Comments (13)

The Democrats are going to require insurance policies to anyone who applies, even if they've waited until they're sick to buy insurance. They'll also require the company to charge everyone nearly the same standard rate, raising everyone's premium. Democrats will require higher benefit levels and taxes again raising everyone's premiums. Then they will offer government insurance, using Madoff shell game accounting, at a low premium which they will call public competitive. The market will be distorted by this meddling leading to explosive public debt. The insurance industry, like the banks, because of government meddling in Fannie and Freddie, and the once profitable car industry because of government meddling in the energy market, will then go belly up. Dodd, Frank, Pelosi, Waters, are pushing an unpaid for scam. The Democrats who never take responsibility for their messes must not be allowed to create another one. They must be stopped.BY graham on 10/28/2009 at 11:29
THE ART OF COMPROMISE MEETS THE MARTIAL ARTSSee BY Bruce on 10/28/2009 at 11:42
You really do drink the cool-aid graham. The problem here is that this is a blend of lobbying messages and game theory inside the realm of business. What happens is the company agrees for X number of policies at price Y. Now the cost to consumers for the same policy not through their company is price Z. YBY Adam on 10/28/2009 at 12:25
Let them raise rates!Insurance Companies have already warned us they will raise our insurance rates Public Option or not! When they raise their rates many small businesses will drop Health coverage for their workers who will then have only the public Option to fall back on.Threaten as they will; they will be cutting their own throats. They will drive millions of workers money out of their Private coffers.BY Donaldd on 10/28/2009 at 12:37
If there's any group that have worn out their welcome it is corporate profiteering elitist CEOs who care more about making profits to buy their second mansion than they do caring for the people of America. They had their day in the sun under Bush and now they are just complaining that they can't screw the American people as hard as they used to.BY Ethan on 10/28/2009 at 12:47
Repeal the Antitrust Law excemption against competition, the insurance companies presently have. This is why we have 1-2 insurance companies in most states. They hate competition and is why they are opposed to the public option.BY Kentucky on 10/28/2009 at 13:12
This is an emotional issue for many Americans. This so-called “public option” presents serious challenges for us. As Consumers we should be able to compare the cost and quality of health care services. How much is a specific surgery at one hospital, as compared with another? http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/media/BY Dana on 10/28/2009 at 13:35
Responding to Dana: Many, if not most, private insurers decide in advance which doctors and hospitals a consumer can use; consequently, there is limited choice in the system as it currently exists. I see this as an emotional issue only for those with "cadillac" health plans, who stand to lose those plans due to unemployment or retirement.BY jmanO on 10/28/2009 at 16:10
What about the $500 billion dollars being cut from Medicare won't that also cause the same type of "cost shift"?Is the Business Roundtable also against cutting Medicare?BY Albert Ens on 10/28/2009 at 23:02
The CEO's are correct to an extent. A public option with rates that approximate medicare will force providers to charge the wealthier clientele (business) more to offset the loss of income from lower public-option rates. However, this would be unsustainable over the longer term — since higher rates for private plans will push more people to the public option.The end result will likely look a lot like Medicare does today - only with people under age 65 being eligible. The public option pays for basic service that many higher-end providers will not support (e.g. Medicare). The private sector will then provide "public option plus" plans to those who can afford it (e.g. Medicare Advantage).For the life of me, I cannot understand why business would oppose something that would eventually reduce the costs of their benefits packages. Except… when has American business EVER supported an idea that would reduce their ability to exert control over their employees ability to choose their own future?BY Craig Cooper on 10/28/2009 at 23:24

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.