THE HILL
 

Rep. Miller: No amendments likely as healthcare reform bill moves forward

By Mike Soraghan - 10/30/09 12:15 PM ET

A House Democratic leader strongly hinted Friday that amendments won’t be allowed on the healthcare bill.

Hispanic members, abortion-rights opponents, supporters of “single-payer” healthcare and liberal members are all clamoring for the chance to offer amendments to the landmark legislation. Some want to change the bill, while others want to make a point or gauge support for their proposals.

But Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), a key player in the healthcare debate, said Friday he doesn’t expect those groups will have much of a chance.

“Unless there are major problems I would expect the opportunity for amendments to be very limited, if at all,” Miller said in a telephone news conference.

Miller chairs one of the committees of jurisdiction and also the House Democratic Policy Committee. Also, he is possibly House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's closest ally.

Miller and fellow leader Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) said the dozens of closed-door caucus meetings and private consultations between leaders and the different sub-groups of House Democrats are replacing the need for amendments to be debated and voted upon on the House floor.

They also noted that the bill will be available online for three days before the vote and the previous versions of the bill have been online for months.

“There's been an openness about this process that’s been unprecedented,” DeLauro said.

Pelosi (D-Calif.) essentially decides whether to allow amendments. Technically the decision is up to the House Rules Committee, but the Speaker controls the committee through appointments.


It's not uncommon for leaders of the majority party in the House to prevent amendments being offered even by members of their own party. Pelosi didn't allow amendments on the climate change bill that passed in June. The minority party, though, generally gets at least one opportunity to amend the bill or vote on its own version of the legislation.

On Thursday, Pelosi signaled a reluctance to allow amendments.

“I’d have to be talked into it, I think, but — let’s put it this way — I’m open to it,” Pelosi said in a conference call with liberal bloggers.

The biggest amendment fight is about abortion. Abortion-rights opponents, including dozens of House Democrats, believe that the bill as drafted breaks the longstanding ban on taxpayer money funding abortions. That’s because people could be offered subsidies to buy private insurance that would include abortion.

Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) wants to offer an amendment that prevents plans that cover abortion from being part of the “exchanges” set up in the bill, where people could buy subsidized insurance. Abortion-rights supporters said people shouldn’t be prevented from buying private insurance that covers abortion.

Stupak says he has 40 Democratic votes to block the bill from coming to the floor, a process called “taking down the rule.” Joined with all Republicans, that would be enough to block the legislation.

Talks between Stupak and leaders have been at a stalemate, but DeLauro said Friday “that issue is being addressed. It will unfold in the next couple of days.”

But House liberals also want an up-or-down vote on the “robust,” Medicare-based public health insurance option they have advocated. Pelosi (D-Calif.) replaced it with a version detached from Medicare in order to win the votes of centrist Democrats. Some liberal leaders have indicated that they too may try to block the bill from coming to the floor if they don't get a vote.

And members of the Congressional Hispanic and Asian-Pacific caucuses may also demand their own up-or-down votes on an amendment to repeal the constraints placed on legal, documented immigrants wanting to sign up for government-subsidized health insurance.

Also, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) secured a commitment from Pelosi and House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) for a vote on a fully government-run, “single-payer” insurance program in July to get liberal support for moving the bill out of committee. Weiner said Thursday that he'd been told “all systems are go,” but leaders have pointedly declined to confirm that.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/65635-rep-miller-no-amendments-likely-on-healthcare-bill

Comments (30)

The problem with this strategy if it is implemented (unlikely) is that it will risk to many votes. Pelosi if sshe wants to pass this monstrosity has to allow amendments on the floor.BY gabe on 10/30/2009 at 13:46
Lies, lies and more lies! Amendments are already there and more amendments will be included once lobbyists who provide kick-backs to DC reps/senators/congress people let them know they were left out. Americans now understand how the game is played in DC and how tax payers have been played (screwed) for many years! So, don't lie Pelosi and Miller!BY Rube11 on 10/30/2009 at 14:02
I wonder how many "pork" attachments are going through with this unwanted legislation? This will be the end of liberalism, thank God!BY George on 10/30/2009 at 14:03
No amendments? When the Republicans did this the Democrats called it "Martial Law". What do the Democrats call it now? Probably something like "doing the people's business". I like how Miller says that "closed-door caucus meetings and private consultations between leaders and the different sub-groups of House Democrats are replacing the need for amendments to be debated and voted upon on the House floor". What happened to the most transparent Congress ever that Pelosi promised? So closed-door meetings and backroom horsetrading is an adequate substitute for amendments being debated on C-SPAN where every members has a vote. If this is what the Leadership thinks than heaven help us all.BY Eric on 10/30/2009 at 14:27
Great, so those representing the majority view in this country (regardless of what Nancy Pants does, this is still a center-right country) have absolutely ZERO input into this bill. So much for the 'most open, honest and ethical Congress.' Look at the leaked ethics committee report and compare the number of D's to R's. Culture of corruption? It isn't just a culture, it's their lifestyle. Liberals are ensuring their irrellevance for years to come with this treasonous behavior. CAN NOT WAIT UNTIL 2010!!!BY NancyPants on 10/30/2009 at 14:34
Are you serious???????!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ok… this is not good people. Even if you are in favor of this mess of a bill, it is downright insane to deny the mere oppurtunity to add amendments to ANY bill. The actions of Congress are becoming more and more literally scary with each passing day. Wow.BY Chris on 10/30/2009 at 14:42
BY jschmidt on 10/30/2009 at 14:43
A DOPE OF THE FIRST ORDER. A CANDIDATE TERM LIMITS WAS MADE FOR.BY DAN SHANTEAL on 10/30/2009 at 15:01
Call your worthless congresspeople and senators (if yoou can find the cowards) and tell them what you think. They are parasites.BY SPQR_US on 10/30/2009 at 15:18
You would think by the comments here that this must be everyone's first rodeo.BY Chuck on 10/30/2009 at 15:21

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.