THE HILL
 

Rep. Joe Barton wants hearing with Sebelius, CBO before health vote

By Molly K. Hooper - 11/01/09 06:43 PM ET

A top-ranking GOP lawmaker is calling on Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Henry Waxman to convene a public hearing with key administration officials on Wednesday before the House votes on the healthcare bill.

Ranking member Joe Barton (R-Texas) wrote, in a letter to his counterpart, that it was imperative that lawmakers question Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Congressional Budget Office Director Doug Elmendorf as to the implications of the bill.

“The new legislation, H.R. 3962, creates a government-run health plan where the Secretary of HHS would be permitted to negotiate rates with providers. However, it seems clear from the legislative language of H.R. 3962 that doctors could, and most likely would, be paid a base rate at Medicare levels and the HHS Secretary would be authorized to pay providers less than the Medicare rate,” Barton wrote in the letter to Waxman.

Democratic leaders introduced the final legislative text of their 1,990-page bill last Thursday morning and would like for the lower chamber to vote on the measure as early as Friday or Saturday.

Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) describes the new bill as an “off-shoot” of the Democrats' original healthcare measure, H.R. 3200, which was approved by the three committees of jurisdiction.

But there have been a number of significant changes made to that original proposal that have caused lawmakers a great deal of heartburn, including the doctor reimbursement provision.

It is still unclear as to whether House Democratic leaders have the 217 votes necessary to approve the new bill.

House Republicans initiated a full-court press to scour and publicize all potentially earth-shaking elements in the freshly released bill to sway wavering Democratic lawmakers.

They contend that the bill was written in backrooms and are making every attempt to drag out the time between now and when leaders call the bill up for a vote on the floor.

Democrats are well aware of the tactic, and are not likely to grant Barton’s request for a public hearing with Sebelius and Elmendorf.

Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) made a point on Thursday night of saying that members have had more time to weigh in on this legislation than on many other monumental bills.

“We have had hearings on healthcare reform from 2007 to this day. We have had 81 hours of committee markup. We have had over 86 hours of hearings. We had over 203 hours of caucuses on our side. I presume you have had a similar time, I am sure, paying attention to this bill that has been available to you. It's been 80 days from the time the House bill was first introduced, of which this is obviously an offshoot. It's been 126 days since, as I said, the House discussion draft was first made available online. I think every one of us has had ample opportunity to debate the bill and offer amendments,” Hoyer said to his GOP counterpart Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) during the end of the week colloquy.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/65785-rep-barton-wants-hearing-with-sebelius-cbo-director-before-health-vote

Comments (8)

and you Hoyer and the pelosi buffoons have kept changing the bill, hiding the elcrapo in it. We do not want government healthcare thats is taking freedom and liberty from citizens/voters/taxpayers.Start over from scratch with this whoremunus piece of bull poopoo or shove it where the sun don't shine.BY jake2 on 11/01/2009 at 19:59
If the GOP could just propose a SHORT bill, in print, show it to the people, say the webaddress into the camera, the people will see it. It doesnt have to be accepted. it doesnt have to be comprehensive. It should propose to do something, not preclude the outcome, and clearly state the implementation. The polls would move, and this nightmare could all be over.BY distraught on 11/01/2009 at 21:14
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, our cowboys and cowgirls in congress have had the forsight to "Exempt" themselves from participating in this "Giant Step twords surfdom" So much for Baracks promise of, "health care as good as the plan Congress has"Im going to go "throw up" now…BY Dontreadonme on 11/01/2009 at 23:40
Wow, I've been diligent about watching Cspan. Honest to goodness, I'm trying to figure out how Mr Hoyer comes up with those hours. That is simply not true. Unless of coure he counts hours as private talks in the restroom.BY JD Plus on 11/02/2009 at 02:59
These libs are evil. They'll do anything to stuff this down our throats. This has to be stopped.BY kansasgirl on 11/02/2009 at 08:26
Never before in history have Americans been forced under penalty threat of fines and possible prison time to purchase a product or service. That's according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office. Yet, these Marxist Democrats are determined to force it on us now while slashing Medicare benefits for seniors. What they're doing is entirely unconstitutiona l despite what White House stooge-buffoon Robert Gibbs says. They will eventually be shot down and a whole slew of them better start lining up their moving vans now because they're not coming back in January of 2011! Make sure your representative knows how you feel about it and that by voting yes, they are voting themselves OUT of office!BY Bob on 11/02/2009 at 10:55
Elmendorf/CBO's scoring of these bills finds them relatively deficit-neutral over the next decade because there are ten years of in-flow (taxes/fees/etc) vs. six to seven years of out-flow (subsidies/vouchers/etc). Obama said he won't sign a bill that raises the deficit by a dime - now or in the future. If the CBO (or some journalist with integrity - if any still exist) would simply expand the scoring period out for another ten years, it would show a huge short-fall.BY Dave R on 11/02/2009 at 12:07
USPS/IRS Health Care Of those "50 million," that lack insurance there were 45,000 who died without health care. With health care, 98,000 died FROM health care because of malpractice. The question is do we want to trust that largest corporation in the world, the U.S. Government. Do not expect house calls anytime soon. We have seen how well the government delivers on its promises and its bureaucracies pursue the money without giving us benefits on so many levels. Imagine another organ of the government that only ultimately must listen to the Secretary of the Treasury - another "service" of which is the IRS. http://theprogressivecapitalist.blogspot.com/2009/10/affordable-health-care-for-america-act.htmlThat blog of mine above has several .pdf connections (HR. 3962 and two summaries, a few videos, and page references for new taxes and other mandates). If you cannot use the link, google "Progressive Capitalist H.R. 3962."If you believe the promises of this bill, you have to deal with the lie that it fosters competition with a government option called the "Public Option" and establishes the government as a monopoly making its own rules. Don't worry. You'll run out of "rich" soon enough. We have at least a$12 trillion economy of which at least $1.8 trillion is spent on health care. If you read the bill, there are plenty of opportunities to soak the middle class, if you do not mind th 1.6 million made jobless.BY JohnLloydScharf on 11/02/2009 at 16:00

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.