THE HILL
 

AARP endorses House healthcare reform bill

By Jeffrey Young - 11/05/09 11:55 AM ET

Democrats scored a huge coup Thursday when the AARP announced its endorsement of the House healthcare bill.

The public support from the seniors’ lobby comes just two days before House members are set to vote on the landmark legislation.

“AARP is proud to endorse the Affordable Health Care for America Act. We urge members of the House to pass this critical bill this year so our healthcare system can work for all of us," AARP CEO A. Barry Rand said at a press conference. “This bill includes critical priorities for seniors – critical – ensures quality, affordable health coverage options for all Americans, provides and strengthens Medicare for today’s seniors and future generations and puts us on a path to improving our long-term health system.”

While the endorsement hardly guarantees success for the Democrats, the group has a fearsome track record of getting its way in major political debates. The AARP played a decisive role in derailing President George W. Bush's effort to add private investment accounts to Social Security in 2005. Two years prior, the AARP enraged Democrats by endorsing and helping to enact Bush's plan to add a prescription drug benefit to Medicare.

Polls have shown senior citizens to be the hardest segment of society to win over on healthcare reform. An intensified effort by the AARP could provide a significant boost to the effort.

President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats have aggressively courted the AARP's backing all year. To this point, the organization had withheld an endorsement, at one point even demanding Obama retract a statement he made this summer prematurely claiming the AARP's endorsement.

But the AARP had practically done everything but endorse the Democrats' bills. On its own and in coalitions with business and consumer groups, the AARP has spent millions over the past two years promoting healthcare reform. In addition, the group has used its formidable grassroots network to sell reform to skeptical older Americans and pushed back hard against conservative claims that the Democratic legislation would cut Medicare benefits, enforce government rationing of healthcare services and establish "death panels" to deny care to people near the end of life.

The bill includes numerous major priorities for the AARP. Under the House legislation, a gap in Medicare's drug coverage would be eliminated and the government would be permitted to directly negotiate drug prices for the program. In addition, health insurance market reforms would limit insurers' ability to deny coverage and charge higher premiums to older Americans, while subsidies would be provided to help low- and moderate-income people to pay for insurance.

The AARP's activities have raised the ire of Republicans, who cast aspersions on the AARP's motives by noting that the organization partially finances its operations with revenue from sales of health insurance products. 

“These same people who are raising some of these objections are people who have in the past voted for very stiff reductions in Medicare benefits and rates,” said John Rother, the AARP’s executive vice president of policy and strategy.

Indeed, the AARP is supporting a bill that would cut hundreds of billions of dollars from Medicare, though Democrats insist those spending reductions will not negatively affect benefits. Big cuts to funding for private Medicare Advantage plans, however, could likely lead to the extra benefits being scaled back for some beneficiaries.

The AARP's prominent role in promoting healthcare reform has also fomented dissent within its ranks. AARP executives have acknowledged that its conservative members have objected to its perceived support of Obama's agenda, with a few thousand of them quitting in protest.

“We believe,” Rand said, that “more people will be interested in lower-cost healthcare than being mad at AARP” and that the group will actually gain members as a result of its support for the House bill.

The AARP will not take a position on the Senate’s version of healthcare reform until Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) unveils the legislation, Rother said.

This story was updated at 1:30 p.m.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/66533-aarp-endorses-house-healthcare-bill

Comments (45)

"Indeed, the AARP is supporting a bill that would cut hundreds of billions of dollars from Medicare, though Democrats insist those spending reductions will not negatively affect benefits."Yeah, because in the real world, cutting billions will have absolutely no effect at all. Honestly, if you believe that on, Obamabot doesn't even begin to describe you.BY ObamaisCarter on 11/05/2009 at 12:10
Obamaiscarter - You can't have it both ways. You either want to cut spending but not medicare and you want to increase spending in the wars just not on healthcare. It's a bit hypocritical in that regard. I don't like cutting spending on medicare and other things but if it's necessary over the long term then well it has to be done.BY Chris on 11/05/2009 at 12:36
AARP has nothing invested, except for their Insurance Company revenue. Technically, the House Bill will benefit the Evil Insurance segment, by giving the 'Uninsurables' a soft place to land. They'll be cycling in and out of the Plan's as needed. Penalty tax will be less than Premium for coverage and with no PreExisting Conditions limitations, Anyone can get Coverage Anytime. Need hernia Repair? Buy the Plan, get Surgery, then Drop it. The Plan may not cover many Persons, but it'll have A HEAPING HELPING of CLAIMS.BY KstJay on 11/05/2009 at 12:39
AARP has supported all the other government run health care bills,why should this one be any different.They stand to make $ billions from this sweetheart deal they have made with the administration, and all on the backs of our most respected citizens,''The American Senior''.BY rick on 11/05/2009 at 12:44
I quit AARP long ago. They are a flawed organization which really does not care about us old folks.Blue Dog Democrats better look at the plank that Pelosi wants you to walk. It is very,very short and very high over the water. You won't drown - the fall will kill you.BY AnnieK on 11/05/2009 at 12:46
poor aarp, there goes their subscriptions, 45% of drs. said they would give up medicine if it passes. FYI. in the stimulas bill, there was a bill that in it that set a rationing panel in motion, the 15 member panel has already been picked, the dr. will have to go thru them before he can give you treatment. a little known fact about the stimulas bill. insurance will go up, medicare benefits cut, people who cant afford higher cost will get on public option which means insurance co.s will go out of business, we will all be on gov. run medicare/medicad, which is already going broke. waiting times will be much longer. look at canadas, they are going broke and in the uk you cant get surgery for over a year and then only surgery the gov. deems important, so no corpal tunnel, back, knee or foot surgerys. babies born under 22 weeks are literally left to die cuz it would be too expensive to care for the child knowing they may not make it. cancer is not being treated unless caught early cuz its too expensive. yes, the bill would make it deficit neutral, by cutting expenses that they deem unnessecery, (surgery,cancer treatments etc). raising taxes and the optout is a joke cuz we will still be paying higher taxes for states who have it. we lose either way. i dont want the gov telling me what treatments i can have or not, that is for my dr. to tell me. but considering 45% of dr.s say they will quit, i hope i never have a serious or chronic illness, they wont treat chronic illnesses either. FOR AARP TO ENDORSE THIS BILL IS HORRIBLE, THEY ONLY CARE ABOUT MONEY, NOT SENIORS.BY cargo65 on 11/05/2009 at 12:47
Chris - Obamaiscarter is simply stating the fact: you can't cut hundreds of billions of dollars and then realistically claim it won't have any effect on benefits. He's not arguing that the cuts are right or wrong - simply that the fact is that there are cuts.The fact you bring "spending on wars" into it means you have no logical retort to the simple fact that it is counterintuitiv e to claim huge spending cuts but not affect benefits.BY Keith on 11/05/2009 at 12:48
AARP supporting a bill that CUTS Medicare. Tell me thats not a sellout.BY Mark X on 11/05/2009 at 12:52
AARP and the American Cancer Soc. supporting this bill should be a red flag..What do they have to lose in this deal…not a thing…As reported by MSNBC, the government will be administering H1N1 vaccines to people on Wall Street and GITMO before people who really need the…and we should trust them with our health care…This administration is out of touch with constitueints. It's about the lack of jobs and economy, which they are killing…BY bailedout on 11/05/2009 at 12:55
Are the cuts in Medicare associated with reductions in drug benefits tied to the $600,000,000,00 0 deficit causing plan passed a few years ago by the fiscal conservatives? If so, the only ones to suffer would be the large drug company's executives (smaller bonuses). The program that guaranteed them large profits paid for (borrowed by) US taxpayers needs to be fixed.BY TUMS on 11/05/2009 at 13:03

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.