By Eric Zimmermann - 11/12/09 01:26 AM EST
Democratic leaders plan to repeal the military’s “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy in next year’s defense authorization bill.
Both the White House and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) back the strategy of using the defense bill to change policy on gays in the military, an aide to Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) told The Hill on Wednesday. Frank, the openly gay chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, is a close ally of Pelosi.
No final decision has been made, but it makes sense to deal with a military policy issue in the defense authorization bill, a House Democratic aide said.
The move could set up a vote on a divisive social issue next year as lawmakers head toward the 2010 midterm elections.
The “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy became law in 1993 and was seen by many as a stumbling start to President Bill ClintonBill ClintonBill Clinton heckled in W. Va. Juan Williams: What Black Lives Matter gets wrong Jane Sanders emerges as Bernie's go-to messenger MORE’s first year in office.
Obama promised repeal during his presidential campaign, and has since worked with Pentagon officials and leaders in Congress.
After coming under fire from gay-rights groups for not doing more to end the policy, Obama in October reiterated his pledge to repeal the law.
But he did not offer a timetable or strategy for when and how he would act.
“I will end ‘Don't ask, don’t tell,’” Obama said at the annual dinner for the Human Rights Campaign, a gay civil rights advocacy group.
“We should not be punishing patriotic Americans who have stepped forward to serve the country,” Obama said. “We should be celebrating their willingness to step forward and show such courage ... especially when we are fighting two wars.”
Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidReid 'fairly certain' Democrats will win Senate Satanists balk at Cruz comparison Cory Booker is Clinton secret weapon MORE (D-Nev.) supports repealing “Don’t ask, don’t tell,” and in September wrote to Obama and Defense Secretary Robert Gates asking for direction on how best to approach the issue.
Reid also mentioned two soldiers discharged from the military after they revealed they were gay. One of the soldiers served in Iraq, while the other flew missions against Taliban targets in Afghanistan.
It is unclear how Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.), the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, would handle including repeal legislation in the Defense authorization bill.
“We just finished this year’s National Defense Authorization Act and we haven’t started talking about what is going to be in next year’s bill,” said Jennifer Kohl, the House Armed Services Committee’s spokeswoman.
Skelton, who played a major role in crafting the original policy, indicated earlier this summer that he would hold hearings on repealing “Don’t ask, don’t tell.” So far, no firm schedule has been set for those hearings.
Skelton announced the hearings while managing the fiscal 2010 defense authorization bill debate on the House floor in response to questions from Reps. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) and Patrick Murphy (D-Pa.), the principal sponsor of a House bill repealing the policy.
The Senate Armed Services Committee had planned to hold a hearing on the policy sometime this month, but so far no date has been set.
Frank told the gay and lesbian magazine The Advocate that the repeal would be included in next year’s Defense authorization bill.
“Military issues are always done as part of the overall authorization bill,” Frank said in the story published on Wednesday. “'Don’t ask, don’t tell' was always going to be part of the military authorization.”
The goal for finishing next year’s defense bill would be the end of September, meaning the policy could be changed by next fall.
Sen. Kirsten GillibrandKirsten GillibrandCarter pledges probe of sex assault testimony This week: Congress on track to miss Puerto Rico deadline Maryland Senate primary intensifies MORE (D-N.Y.) had eyed the 2010 defense authorization bill as the vehicle for a measure imposing a temporary moratorium on gays serving openly in the military. She withdrew the amendment when it became clear she lacked the votes to break a filibuster.
Gillibrand has also mentioned attaching a repeal to an extension of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
An executive order could only suspend implementation of the ban, rather than repeal it outright.
At press time, the House bill to repeal the ban had 183 co-sponsors. The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, the organization at the forefront of the repeal, is running a grassroots campaign to win 218 co-sponsors for the legislation — a number that would likely ensure safe passage of the bill in the House.
Roxana Tiron contributed to this report.