THE HILL
 

CMS: House health bill will hike costs $289B

By Molly K. Hooper - 11/14/09 03:42 PM ET

The House-approved healthcare overhaul would raise the costs of healthcare by $289 billion over the next 10 years, according to an analysis by the chief actuary at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

(READ THE FULL REPORT HERE)

The CMS report is a blow to the White House and House Democrats who have vowed that healthcare reform would curb the growth of healthcare spending. CMS's analysis is not an apples-to-apples comparison to the cost estimate conducted by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) because CMS did not review tax provisions, which help offset the price tag of the Democrats' measure.

However, the CMS analysis clearly states that the House bill falls short in attaining a key goal of the Democrats' effort to reform the nation's healthcare system: "With the exception of the proposed reduction in Medicare... the provisions of H.R. 3962 would not have a significant impact on future healthcare cost growth rates."

Republicans immediately seized on CMS's conclusions.

The long-awaited report should serve as a "stark warning to every Republican, Democrat and Independent worried about the future of this nation," Ways and Means Committee ranking member Dave Camp (R-Mich.) said in a statement on Saturday. 

Though House Republicans pressed to have this analysis completed before the lower chamber voted on the Democrats' sweeping healthcare reform bill last week, it was not ready until late Friday. Chief CMS Actuary Richard Foster, who prepared the report, recently told The Hill that he and his staff had only a few days to review the bill before it was voted on. 

Brendan Daly, communications director for Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), said, "The report shows that our health reform bill will extend the life of the Medicare trust fund by five years -- significantly longer than any proposal in recent years," adding, "Medicare actuaries estimate $100 billion more in savings than CBO from Medicaid and Medicare."

Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) highlighted the CMS report on Saturday in a written statement. "This report once again discredits Democrats’ assertions that their $1.3 trillion government takeover of health care will lower costs, and it confirms that this bill violates President Obama’s promise to ‘bend the cost curve.’ It’s now beyond dispute that their bill will raise costs, which is exactly what the American people don’t want."

Republicans predicted that if the CMS numbers were available last Saturday when the House voted on the Democrats' healthcare bill, the measure would not have passed.

“This report confirms what virtually every independent expert has been saying: Speaker Pelosi’s healthcare bill will increase costs, not decrease them. I hope my colleagues in the Senate heed CMS’ findings and refuse to rush ahead until any bill under consideration can be certified to actually reduce healthcare costs," Camp said. 

According to the 31-page report, the House-passed bill would increase costs, cut Medicare and expand Medicaid.

“In aggregate, we estimate that for calendar years 2010 through 2019 [national health expenditures] would increase by $289 billion," the report notes.

"About three-fifths" or more than 60 percent of the uninsured would gain coverage by an expansion in Medicaid eligibility.

Medicare would be cut by "more than one-half trillion dollars ($571 billion), ... possibly jeopardizing access to care for beneficiaries," according to the report, and smaller companies would be "inclined to terminate their existing coverage."

Camp said that the nonpartisan analysis demonstrates that the Democrats' bill "does the opposite of everything they've been wanting to do" in terms of reducing overall health costs.

He added the CMS report shows that "this is not healthcare reform, this is entitlement expansion."

A Democratic aide said the CMS and CBO findings are not that different: "While the actuaries do not show tax increases, adding those amounts from JCT would also illustrated that the proposal reduces the deficit over the next 10 years."

In an interview with The Hill on Saturday afternoon, Camp pointed out that CMS actuarial numbers were cited by Democrats back in 2003 during the Medicare prescription drug debate. CMS estimated at that time that the GOP-crafted Medicare bill would cost more than $550 billion over 10 years while CBO estimated its pricetag at $395 over the same period. The CMS cost estimate did not emerge until after the final conference bill was approved by Congress.

CMS's findings are not binding on Congress, however. Congress must abide by CBO and JCT estimates.


This story was last updated at 7:59 p.m.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/67791-cms-house-health-bill-will-hike-costs-289b

Comments (53)

Undoubtedly, the impending release of this report and the almost certain conclusions it woul state spurred Ms. Pelose on in her efforts to sneak the legislation through in the dead of night. One must ask, "If their purpose was not help their constituents by reducing the cost of heath care, thereby making it more readily available to all, what was their purpose?" Whatever it was, the effort was misguided and the Democrat party will pay for it for many years to come.BY Jim Evans on 11/14/2009 at 16:01
Both the Dem Reps need to be voted out of office. Health Care Reform is politics as usual.We could expand Medicare/Single Payer system for all and be done. However all the special interest groups including the Health Insurance Companies won't get their high profits. So big profits will win out over the need of health care reform. Remember this when its time to vote.BY TiredOfPolitics on 11/14/2009 at 16:16
Jim, their efforts were to make more people dependant on them. This bill is perfectly formulated to that. Tax the rich and small business (the ones that provide jobs), expand the government's social safety net with a government run option and force companies to comply to hundreds of new regulations. The whole goal of this bill haas been twofold. The first to expand government and its role in our lives and second to make people more dependant and reliable on the government. It was not to help but to expand their voting bloc and create a permanent welfare nation.BY gabe on 11/14/2009 at 16:24
tiredofpolitics > Check the profit margin of those insurance companies you are so worried about. It was a 2% profit last year. Also check on the comparison of which insurance (govt run includedd) who deny services and coverage. Turn off the damn TV and read reports from professionals in their field. Not sure where in the heck "singler-payer" comes into this as most of America doesn't want it and the gross disrespect other countries and some of our politicians tryto push on us tells us how little respect they have and just how arrogrant and selfish THEY are. Several viable options have been put on the table-this is not what liberals want. If you want medicaid type service-quit your job and apply for it-very easy fix and actually a win-win for both of us. I will get to keep the standard of life I EARNED and you get to have your government run insurance you are trying to force on the rest of us. BTW-not even close to rich or even wealthy —just happy with my accomplishments and demand YOU stay out of my pocket. -oh, except when I help pay for your medicaid-it will be worth it to me to keep my freedom.BY BlogLogic on 11/14/2009 at 16:42
Irrespective of the cost, inview of all this government depends on the American people to contribute, do they not yet deserve a healthcare system that insures their continued healthy contributions. They're expected to fight it's wars, produce it's commodities, and pay the taxes demanded. A potentially sick and frail people are not an asset to anyone. Someone at your place of business needs to read; BY Juan Harris on 11/14/2009 at 16:48
Oh how I wish you single payer folks would stop talking as if single payer would cost almost nothing! Medicare is not a cheap program, it has a very difficult time controlling costs, and with your attitudes that somehow you could have "free" health care and it wouldn't cost anyone anything, if we did have single payer it would most surely go bankrupt. When American consumers and patients show they understand that less care is often better care, then we can talk about single payer.BY LindaB on 11/14/2009 at 17:01
Please read the report!The report explicitly states that it does not include cost reductions that have been assessed by the CBO. In fact, this report explicitly supports the CBO's estimate that the bill will reduce the deficit! This report's purpose is to assess Federal expenditures WITHOUT the costs reducing measures in the bill because it is NOT qualified to undertake such assessments. Therefore, this should not be at all news except to illustrate the legitimacy of CBO's report. I.e., this emphasizes different estimates but SUPPORTS the overall estimates offered by the CBO. Please put this information in your updated version of this news report.PS: Have you noticed other news (except Politico) agencies have not rushed out attention-grabbing headlines like this one? Perhaps, they choose to read the report before reporting on it. When they do report on it, hopefully the headline and subsequent discussion will do justice to the hard work undertaken by the CMS, work that supports the estimates by the CBO.Or will we need, once again, to turn to Comedy Central's Jon Stewart for a more full and accurate account of this report?BY awt3 read the report on 11/14/2009 at 17:04
1. Your link to the full text is broken.2. AWT is correct, please update this article to describe what it was the report was looking at. Otherwise it's difficult to see this article as anything other than a deliberate deception.BY Ryan on 11/14/2009 at 17:18
Read the minds of the voters/taxpayers/citizens. They don't want pelosi-obamacare . KILL IT BEFORE IT KILLS AMERICA. obamacare just another pelosi obama LIE.BY jake2 on 11/14/2009 at 17:30
Obamacare has been wrong from the start. You do not try to fix things by completely abolishing them and starting from sctrach when the thing is not totally broken. The "whole" healthcare system is not at fault. It is government involvement that has soared the cost of healh insurance. Government sets demands on insurance companies to 'educate' the people on health. Haven't you ever wondered why all those mailings from your insurance company? Do you REALLY think those come free of charge? How about fixing the Tort laws so people can't sue and get rocket high reward, many for things that should have never been sued for in the beginning. Fixtort and many costs would go down. Medicare and Social Security is almost bankrupt. So much for government run healthcare. This should show you something. The reason government wants to step in is because they want control of our lives. They want to take more and more of our liberty away so we become totally dependant on them. They want us to be like European countries so we will sink to Europe levels and Europe will then be happier. I guess some of you do not know our succes has angered many European countries huh? Obama once said he was a citizen of the world. That might be the only truth he has ever told. This administration has put us into more debt than any other president in this short a time. Yet, he can't decide on how to help our soldiers win the war in Afghanistan. We must not let this administration get this healthcare plan or get us into any more debt. This country is in enough trouble as it is. We need to stop spending, bring back some of the jobs people have lost, and worry about healthcare in a few years so we have time to restore our economy.BY Dorothy Hanussak on 11/14/2009 at 17:34

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.