THE HILL
 

Top Democrats eye stock trade tax

By Mike Soraghan - 11/17/09 08:46 PM ET

House Democratic leaders are considering imposing a new tax on stock transactions to fund a jobs bill, leadership sources tell The Hill.

Rep. Ed Perlmutter (D-Colo.) has been making the case for such a Wall Street tax, and House leaders have started paying attention as they look for a way to pay for the jobs bill, leadership sources said.

The idea is attractive because it’s very small, likely 0.25 percent of each trade. And since Wall Street is perceived by many as having caused the economic slump, brokers have little political standing to try to stop it.

It also has the support of the nation’s largest labor union.

The AFL-CIO, one of the Democratic Party’s most powerful allies, suggested the idea in August.

The group’s policy director, Thea Lee, estimated the tax could raise between $50 billion and $100 billion per year.

Small- and medium-sized investors would hardly notice a transaction tax, but major trading firms may see it as a significant threat to their profits.

Leading financial lobbyists say the tax would harm the economy.

“It would impact all Americans, from retirees to [the] self-employed to parents saving for their kids’ education. It would place permanent handcuffs on the economy,” said Scott Talbott, senior vice president at the Financial Services Roundtable, which represents 100 large financial companies.

“It would clip the wings of the economy just as it is starting to recover,” he added.

Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), a senior member of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said that in addition to the transaction tax, there is talk of using money from the $700 billion Wall Street bailout and other sources. But leaders aren’t looking at an increase in the gas tax.

“There’s very little talk about user fees,” DeFazio said.

Leaders said they are trying to pass a jobs bill before leaving for Christmas, at least in the House.

And the legislation could include a renewed emphasis on highway construction.

Committee Chairman Jim Oberstar (D-Minn.) said that transportation will be a “centerpiece” of the jobs legislation. DeFazio said that though only 4 percent of the stimulus package earlier this year went to transportation, it created 25 percent of the jobs.

“We’re a proven job-generator,” DeFazio said. “The big problem has been the White House, and if the White House is getting on board, I don’t think there will be a problem.”

Republicans said that if Democrats want to create jobs, they should look at ideas that GOP lawmakers have been pressing for months.

“Republicans have been working for months now trying to forge solutions as to how to get Americans back to work,” said House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.).

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has asked key committee chairmen for ideas on job creation, said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.).

There has been debate over whether to do one large, catch-all bill or several topic-specific bills. Hoyer said he expected the work of several committees to be wrapped into one bill.

Hoyer declined to give a dollar figure for what Democrats are planning, but he said he expects Democrats will, at a minimum, extend unemployment benefits and COBRA health insurance assistance for the unemployed.

Other options include aid to states to preserve public-sector jobs and tax breaks for creating jobs. Democrats have consulted extensively with a group of economists, but Hoyer said there have been “differences of opinion” on what tactics are most effective.

The action comes after a report from the Labor Department that showed unemployment hitting 10.2 percent in October. The jobless rate is expected to continue to rise in coming months.

The 26-year high in the unemployment rate has spiked concerns among Democrats at the White House and in both chambers of Congress, particularly with midterm elections less than a year away.

Hoyer rejected the characterization of the House effort as a “second stimulus,” saying it will be more narrowly targeted than the $787 billion stimulus.

The massive stimulus bill also has become a target for conservatives angry at the surge in federal spending. The jobs bill could raise those arguments again from Republicans who oppose public spending and conservative “Blue Dog” Democrats who want to see the spending offset by cuts in programs or by tax hikes

“When you have a sick economy, you have to do something to fix it,” said Blue Dog Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.). “But there are real and legitimate concerns about the deficit.”

But Hoyer indicated that the spending might not be offset, because increasing taxes would counteract the effort to boost the economy.

“The challenge we have is to stimulate the economy and not depress it at the same time,” Hoyer said.

The Senate is also expected to work on a jobs initiative, though it is unclear when the Senate might take up legislation. That chamber is expected to be busy with healthcare reform for the rest of 2009.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) told Democrats at their weekly policy lunch last week that he plans to bring up a jobs measure, but did not say when he would do so.

The administration announced last week that it would hold a jobs summit, specifying on Monday evening that the summit will take place on Dec. 3.

Obama will follow that event with a trip to Allentown, Pa., for a forum on jobs, part of a “Main Street tour” announced by the White House, in which Obama will travel to a number of cities and towns over the next few months.

Alexander Bolton and Silla Brush contributed to this article.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/68273-dems-eye-stock-trade-tax

Comments (75)

Great, now they are going to tax us on the way in and on the way out (cap gains). A new tax that will affect anyone with a 401k and anyone who invests for retirement. That is all Democrats seem to be able to do is tax us and overspend. Their job bills so far have done nothing but make unemployment go HIGHER. This is getting so absurd. What we want: leave us alone…lower taxes, not raise them. Are you crazy? This will cause MORE unemployment.BY Andrew on 11/17/2009 at 21:10
for information on salaries being paid, Salary For.com http://www.salaryfor.com/has a huge database of real salaries that companies are paying for different positions as well as career advice and job listings. you can post your own salary or view others for free.BY Kay on 11/17/2009 at 21:13
We should join with the Europeans and impose a transaction tax on derivatives instead of stocks. Derivatives are only traded by institutions and they created the massive instability that we have in our financial system. If institutions wanted to move their trading off shore they would be welcome to do that and take the instability they create with them.Learn more about the proposed trading tax on Riski:http://freerisk.org/wiki/index.php/Tobin_taxBY Cate Long on 11/17/2009 at 21:50
So let me get this straight, we are being taxed to spend money. If this as an idea catches fire this country will bankrupt its consumers let alone the nation as a whole.BY gabe on 11/17/2009 at 21:55
I think we should lay massive taxes on industries that "progressive" radicals work in, such as the entertainment industry. In addition, college professors should have to pay a 20% surcharge on all income to compensate society for all the failed experiments they send to their "progressive" friends like a government run healthcare program. Now that would be a fair society!BY Andrew on 11/17/2009 at 21:58
Why can't these radical Democrats get it through their thick skulls: We DON'T need or want any more tax increases, no matter how "small." If these liberals truly care about jobs for Americans, why don't they enforce immigration laws and free up jobs for unemployed working class Americans — the constituency they USED to care about!BY former Democrat on 11/17/2009 at 22:06
Jesus H, Congress…STOP SPENDING! STOP STOP STOPThey're insane. Out of their ever loving minds. Psychotic. Out of control. Their only reason for breathing is to write checks with our money. STOPI'm ready to vote for a moratorium on Congress. Blocking them from taking any action on anything for five years. We're doomed if they don't stop.BY JR on 11/17/2009 at 22:28
What don't these Fools understand about Cut Spending !It's always Tax Tax Tax..Then Spend Spend Spendor Print Print Print Spend Spend SpendWhat Idiots !BY Cut Spending on 11/17/2009 at 22:30
I think we need to lay massive taxes on any federal government employee except the CIA and the Pentagon. TiTake 75% of their wages on salaries over $20,000 per year.. Let me see 9,000,000,000 employees that would be a start. Let Senators, Congressman and Adminstration WHINE. Thats what the pigs at the trough on the farm do.BY jake2 on 11/17/2009 at 22:36
Makes no sense. To create jobs fire two small business traders to help hire one road pothole filler person. The tax advocates hate traders so much they would like to also use them to fill up the pot holes. Every continued attack on small business - which includes trading - is a warning shot to bunker down and not hire. Don't think you can dodge a bullet, these taxmunnists will eat your lunch to. Quick reply from iPhone. more pro reply tomorrow.BY Robert A. Green on 11/17/2009 at 22:54

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.