THE HILL
 

House Republicans expect strong vote against 'doc fix'

By Molly K. Hooper - 11/19/09 01:11 PM ET

House Republicans anticipate a strong vote against the so-called "doc fix" bill on Thursday, when the House considers the measure that would increase doctor reimbursements provided under Medicare.

After calling an early-morning, closed-door meeting for GOP lawmakers to discuss the issue, leaders emerged confident that their conference would vote "no" on the doc fix.

According to lawmakers at the conference meeting, a number of members in the GOP Doctors Caucus are struggling with whether to vote for the measure that would prevent a 21 percent decrease in physician reimbursement rates from going into effect in January.

At least one doctor, Rep. Phil Roe (R-Tenn.), said he’s undecided.

As a deficit hawk, he told The Hill that it was difficult to fathom because the Democratic bill is not paid for and “goes against everything (he) stands for.”

But Roe, a longtime OB/GYN, says that without the temporary fix his former colleagues won’t be able to see as many patients.

This “is the hardest vote” that Roe, a freshman, has had to take in Congress, he said.

Not all members of the GOP Doctors Caucus — which includes Reps. John Boozman (Ark.), Charles Boustany Jr. (La.), Michael Burgess (Texas), Paul Broun (Ga.), Bill Cassidy (La.), John Fleming (La.), Phil Gingrey (Ga.), John Linder (Ga.), Tim Murphy (Pa.), Ron Paul (Texas), Tom Price (Ga.), Roe and Mike Simpson (Idaho) — are torn, however.

Gingrey announced that the bill would ultimately harm physicians; he predicted a “solid no” vote from members of his party.

Broun told reporters earlier in the day that all members in the conference would vote against the measure. GOP Whip Eric Cantor (Va.) had to walk back that statement since Broun is not an official whip. Cantor said that he has a “strong sense” that his colleagues oppose the bill, but would not reveal a whip count.

Cantor cited an alternative that his party intends to offer during the debate Thursday afternoon: a version that would provide doctors with a 2 percent Medicare payment rate increase in each of the next four years. It would offset the costs of the increase by implementing tort reform and enacting health insurance simplification policies, according to a release produced by Cantor’s office.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/68639-house-gops-expect-strong-vote-against-doc-fix

Comments (5)

Someone get me a doctor. When I see how ignorant and abismally inept the barack hussein, reid, and pelosi gang are I have to do a reality check. I basically tell myself that hey it's stupid people like these that differentiate the intelligent folks. Problem is the whole barrak hussein administration lacks basic functional intelligence. everything with them is based on taking from the earners and redistributing to their unfunctional supporters. The facts of intelligence is that if you have no one with even a modecum of intelligence in your complete administration that no matter how many brain storming sessions you have you won't be able to come up with an intelligent decision above the highest IQ in the room. And with democrat group think that decision is even dumbed down further. The democrats are really presenting a spectacle or should I say a battle of wits with completely unarmed soldiers.BY John Kennedy on 11/19/2009 at 14:45
So republicans want to cut the salary of physicians that rely on Medicare patients, such as internist, by about 50-60%(110% by 2014), If you consider average overhead in a medical office. What is this other plan to fix the SGR. Everyone could have voted together on this one. It seems like a no brainer. We either allow the democrats to "save" healthcare now. Or we let the system collapse and let Barack swoop in and "fix the republicans mess". There will not be a clinic standing in 2014 if this is not addressed. The republicans are playing into Harry Reid/Pelosi/Obama 's hands on this one.BY Marc on 11/19/2009 at 18:10
John Kennedy, you have presented only a hate-filled diatribe and no substantive ideas on the issue. I believe this must by the official GOP platform now as it is all most of your fellow republicans seem capable of. And please, get off the "Hussein" thing, it's really getting old. Again if you had something legitimate to talk about you wouldn't have to resort to such tactics.BY Susanne  on 11/20/2009 at 11:58
Susanne, why is it that if someone disagrees with the Obama Administration, they are automatically categorized as "hate-filled" or "racist"? That's a backhanded way of not allowing dissent or opposing viewpoints. America is great (was great before the dismantling of our foundations by the Obama Administration) because of free speech, dissent our Constitution that's only 12 pages long. The media's ONLY job is to investigate, dig, and expose corrupt government. All but one media outlet have shamefully not done their jobs, but have instead become part of the Obama campaign (that never ends). The mainstream media is an embarrassment is helping to destroy our country by suppressing opposition to the Obama Admin's dangerous policies by wasting all of their time reporting on "celebrities". Who cares what celebrities are doing!!! Our country is being destroyed from within by liberal progressives. They disdain America are trying to turn us into another faction of the EU. Only then can they "be proud of their country". Well I'm against all of it and I'm not hateful or a racist or a Republican. I oppose the "fundamental transformation" that the Obama Admin is forcing on me and my children and grandchildren.BY Trace on 11/20/2009 at 13:17
Trace, everyone is sick of the shameless dishonesty that comes from ex-Bush, and still-Bush supporters, that it just saves time to slap a label on it. For example, when you say that America "was great before the dismantling of our foundations by the Obama Administration, " we all know you mean that Republicans have essentially destroyed the Constitution and our representative system of governance. It's an endless cycle of Republicans winning elections, then screwing up the government with the exact same corruption they condemn, and then trying to blame the other party for their mistakes, while babbling out the other side of your mouth about how "see? government is bad, m'kay?"Just shut up. Everyone knows the other side is lying (really? Revolution at a time of 2 Republican wars?) There is no bottom, it's only mindless escalation. It's not an anti-Republican thing, it's an anti-liars thing.BY Chase R on 11/25/2009 at 13:29

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.