THE HILL
 

Proponents alter immigration legislation in the face of tough economic climate

By Jared Allen - 11/23/09 06:00 AM ET

House Democrats are making changes to their immigration legislation to reflect the nation’s high unemployment rate.

The move comes as recognition that the 10.2 percent jobless rate – which is expected to rise and remain in double-digits for much of 2010 -- has altered the political landscape for an immigration bill.

“Each bill is reflective of a time. And with unemployment over 10 percent I think we need to have language that is very carefully tailored,” said Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.).

Some supporters of reforming U.S. immigration laws to provide a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants acknowledge the tough economic times create a difficult climate for legislation.

“There are some things that will make it harder [than in past years],” said Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who has co-sponsored legislation on immigration with Gutierrez.

“People will look at the unemployment numbers and say; ‘Well, why are we focusing on this?’  So, yeah, I think the hill’s a little steeper.”

The nation’s unemployment rate was 4.5 percent when legislation sponsored by Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) in 2007 stalemated in the Senate. Michigan, with 7.1 percent unemployment, was the state with the highest jobless rate at the time.

At the end of last month, 22 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and dozens of metropolitan areas had average unemployment rates above 9 percent. Michigan’s rate is above 15 percent. California’s is 12.2 percent.

Gutierrez said he hopes to keep as much of the framework of the 2007 legislation as possible, but some aspects will clearly have to change.

For example, the 2007 legislation created a “New Worker” program as an early step toward earned citizenship, but allowed the Secretary of Labor to reject new worker visas in areas where the unemployment rate rose above 9 percent.

Gutierrez said his latest bill will have to have much higher unemployment thresholds, and he said the dozen of Democrats he has included in an early immigration reform working group are looking at different policy options.

“We believe that every American should always have first crack at every job,” Gutierrez said. “Having said that, where the opportunities exist, we need to sustain our economy. And so we need workers.  Even in this very unstable economic situation we find ourselves in, there are still crabs that need to be picked, there are still onions going un-harvested. It’s just true.”

General anxiety over job security likely will continue to drive Republican opposition against House and Senate immigration bills.

“Americans are conditioned to believe that illegal workers are necessary,” Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), an opponent of granting “amnesty” to illegal immigrants, said Thursday at an immigration forum called: “American Jobs in Peril: The Impact of Uncontrolled Immigration.”’

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), who announced the forum with King, argues the reforms advocated by Gutierrez would allow illegal immigrants to take jobs that should go to citizens and legal immigrants. Smith and King argue Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano was wrong in suggesting last week that the recession has triggered a significant decline in immigration and the best opportunity to enact reform.

“How can they allow 12 million illegal immigrants to take jobs that should go to citizens and legal immigrants?,” he asked in a statement announcing the forum.  “And how can they claim that enforcement is ‘done’ when there are more than 400 open miles of border with Mexico, hundreds of thousands of criminal and fugitive aliens and millions of illegal immigrants taking American jobs?”

Flake said the unified GOP resistance to most Democratic priorities, unemployment and the emerging Democratic approach to immigration reform have made bipartisanship unlikely.

“Given what we’ve seen, I’d be surprised [to see a bipartisan bill],” he said.

Gutierrez and other advocates of a guest worker program are still charging ahead with plans for legislation that would create a pathway to citizenship for some 12 million undocumented immigrants. They hope to see Congress begin a debate this spring, though this will depend on the Senate taking up legislation.

Gutierrez said he will “design language that guarantees that no American citizen, no one born in the United States of America, will ever lose a job opportunity to someone who is foreign born.”

“That has to be central,” he said.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/69059-dems-alter-immigration-bill-in-face-of-tough-economic-climate

Comments (98)

Gutierrez say's "no American citizen, will ever lose a job OPPORTUNITY to someone who is foreign born." He does not specify that the job MUST go to an American citizen ahead of the illegal workers. Also, shortly after the legislation passes, the ACLU and other organizations will bring lawsuits saying the preferred hiring is discriminatory. Do they not get it? WE DO NOT WANT TO REWARD CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR WITH CITIZENSHIP! What part of illegal do you legislators not understand? You want to reform the workplace? How about making employers pay waiters and waitresses the minimum wage. On a slow night, my daughter can make as little as $10 or $12. That is BEFORE taxes. $2.13 is her pay folks, and that is criminal. She is essentially free labor.BY HoosierMama on 11/23/2009 at 07:07
There are already 8 million illegals holding American jobs.It's about time Congress is noticing that unemployed American citizens need jobs.E-verify ALL employees and free up those jobs. USA first! Congress should be representing us, not illegal immigrants.BY Cindy M on 11/23/2009 at 07:07
if peoples are come here to live a better life and they also contrubuted to our economy and in development. so its good. if this bill is passed they also pay fines and all taxes so it will so much good. and also now they r not paying taxes this thing also contributing to economy decline. so it will be a good to pass comprehensive immigration reform billBY gagan  on 11/23/2009 at 07:38
Gagan claims that legalization will mean that legalized illegal aliens will pay fines and taxes. Nope. They won't pay anything near what it will cost the American taxpayer in terms of welfare and social services to support them and the family members they'd be able to sponsor. Legalization won't change the fact that many illegal aliens are illegal precisely because they have neither the skills nor the education to get better paying jobs. They'd still be among the working poor. As it is, California has the largest number of welfare recipients in the country and about 30% of those live in households headed by illegal aliens.BY Ali on 11/23/2009 at 08:35
In job application, give priority to natural born citizens than to naturalize citizens.In this way, there is no taking of jobs from american citizens.This kind of son of soil, or born in the USA or american first is already used by other countries. illegal immigrants are not only in america, they are everywhere, asia, europe.BY mang goding on 11/23/2009 at 08:46
NO shamnesty, NO dream act. Gutierrez is a traitor, hope he loses his seat in 2010!BY go4gin on 11/23/2009 at 08:58
More Americans will oppose this now that did when Bush tried it. They think the tea party protest are bad? Just wait until they try this.BY Shannon on 11/23/2009 at 09:12
When I see white males picking our produce in the fields, I believe that illegals willl take their jobs. This is another red-herring from the so called christians to exploit people without any legal recourse.BY Enrique on 11/23/2009 at 09:36
Well, this will certainly solve our Social Security fiscal problems. Import 30-40 million young and healthy workers while refusing to pay for medical treatment for 30-40 million elderly.BY Skandia on 11/23/2009 at 09:45
Little Johnny is not an Obama fan A teacher asked her 6th grade class how many of them were Obama fans.Not really knowing what an Obama fan is, but wanting to be liked by the teacher, all the kids raised their hands except for Little Johnny.The teacher asked Little Johnny why he has decided to be different… again.Little Johnny said, "Because I'm not an Obama fan."The teacher asked, "Why aren't you a fan of Obama?" Johnny said, "Because I'm a Republican."The teacher asked him why he's a Republican. Little Johnny answered, "Well, my Mom's a Republican and my Dad's a Republican, so I'm a Republican."Annoyed by this answer, the teacher asked, "If your mom were a moron and your dad were an idiot, what would that make you?"With a big smile, Little Johnny replied, "That would make me an Obama fan."BY notanobamafan on 11/23/2009 at 10:04

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.