THE HILL
 

Delegation visits troops as decision on Afghanistan looms

By Roxana Tiron - 11/26/09 03:57 PM ET

Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), the House’s senior defense appropriator, led a bipartisan congressional delegation to Afghanistan and the Middle East region earlier this week.

Murtha, the chairman of the Appropriations Defense subcommittee, met with the commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, and Ambassador Karl Eikenberry.

The congressional delegation comes a week before President Barack Obama is expected to announce his strategy for Afghanistan and possible troop increases.

Obama’s announcement likely will commence an intense and divisive congressional debate not just over the price tag of the war, but also over the U.S. role in that country.

Murtha told The Hill recently that he does not see an “achievable goal” in Afghanistan. “I do not see a strategy and how we can measure it,” Murtha said.

Murtha’s congressional delegation also stopped at the border between Iraq and Kuwait to observe and talk to officials in charge of the withdrawal of equipment from Iraq. 

Congressional delegations are customary for the Thanksgiving recess particularly with members from defense committees, but they are not announced in advance for security reasons.

The delegation included mostly members of the House Appropriations Committee, such as Reps. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.), Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.), Maurice Hinchey (D-N.Y.), Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.), Kay Granger (R-Texas) and Ken Calvert (R-Calif.).

Meanwhile, the Pentagon has ensured that the deployed military gets “a literal taste of home” for Thanksgiving, said Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon’s press secretary.

The Defense Logistics Agency has made plans to ship Thanksgiving meals for approximately 180,000 troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“Without wading too far into the delicious details, our forces in these two theaters will be sitting down to Thanksgiving feasts that includes 63,000 pounds of potatoes, 8,700 cans of cranberry sauce, 61,000 pounds of stuffing and more than 465,000 pounds of turkey. For dessert, there will be 67,000 pies and cakes,” Morrell said.

“Our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines risk their lives on a daily basis. They deserve every effort we can make to show them how thankful we are for their continuing sacrifices,” Morrell said.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/69567-congressional-delegation-visits-troops-as-presidential-afghanistan-decision-looms

Comments (13)

you want to give the troops what they deserve, then either give them all the extra troops they need now or send them all home. obies strategy of sending 34,000 and having off-ramps if it gets too bad is stupid, its all or nothing and its already too late for the all, just send our children home now, those countries have been fighting since the beginning of time and will still be fighting when the world ends, its pointless over there, they dont want what we are trying to force down their throats, kinda like the healthcare bill here, end it all now.BY cargo65 on 11/26/2009 at 16:43
Hey Murtha, tired of your faux support of our military and tired of your support for cut and run. You were wrong about Iraq and you're wrong about Afghanistan, leave our brave military alone. You are one of the most corrupt members of Congress and use the military as a front for that corruption.BTW, you still haven't apologized for calling the Haditha Marines cold blooded killers, 7 of the 8 have been exonerated and the last one hasn't come to trial as yet.BY juniper on 11/26/2009 at 17:49
What is taking the Dawdler-in-Chief so long to make a decision?BY no excuse on 11/26/2009 at 17:56
Anybody know why we are in Afghanistan yet? Are we still trying to get the citizens that want us to leave their Freedoms? I think possibly we may be there for other reasons ya think? Oil pipeline and poppyseeds anyone? Is this any reason for our men and women to die? I can say that these people who wrap themselves in an american flag and with blind patriotism condone our troops for war and death need to think back to my 1st simple question that has yet to be truthfully answered without a Bushism of "We are there to fight the enemy over there instead of on our homeland." Ridiculous is this statement when our borders are wide open for any terrorist to cross on a whim. Bring our soldiers home,BY Jane on 11/26/2009 at 19:55
Murtha is an Icon for Democrat Corruption on a Grand Scale. But it runs through all the Democrat messes. We pay, they play. Think mortgage mess—created by Congress. Pending Health care mess. Pending cap and trade mess. The Liberal left demonizing CO2 for global warming, which is AWOL. No problem, just make up data and jigger the programs which run the computers and produce a hockey stick. It is about control by the elite left, control freaks who are cooking the books on the costs of health care and climate change to profit from it. The amount of money tied up in this fraud, and potentially to be had from it, is historic. It will be stopped because the American people have had enough. 2010 is coming.BY graham on 11/26/2009 at 20:44
Jane, We got a bit tired of the Mass murder for Allah bigots blowing up our baracks, a war ship, a US embassy here and there, NYCity, and the Pentagon. We tried leaving them alone. It did not work. They will not negotiate, as they love death. We saw again at Ft Hood that they are not peaceful. We are accommodating their wish for death as we prefer to live as a civilized people and as a benign power. Bringing the troops home will embolden them. Keeping them there will shorten the war and make it less bloody. It will enable us to keep them from making contact and to keep them from breaking from contact. It helps to remember we are wearing uniforms as required by the Geneva Conventions. They are out of uniform in complete violation of the Geneva Conventions. And then there are the nukes next door. It is not a good idea to let them get in a position to use the nukes. I'd rather we fight them over there.BY graham on 11/26/2009 at 21:57
Murtha profits from war. If things go too well, his lobby money would dwindle. Is he there to look for new ways to make money for himself? Seeking "improvements" he deems are needed by the defence contractors who line his pockets? He is a disgrace! He would do our military men and women a service by keeping his hypocritical mug out of their sight.BY Mon on 11/27/2009 at 00:42
Graham, We went to war in Afghanistan because afghanis blew up a warship,our US embassy here? or there? I wasn't aware of NYC being hit by the afghani peoples ! We arrested 19 Saudis with box cutters so we arrested the wrong people and it should have been afghanis instead. The pentagon? well, you know how the news is here in america and they just forgot to tell americans that they were all from Afghanistan…geez, who knew? I believe that you are someone who has given full blind patriotism to America and are definitely in denial. We are guarding a new oil pipeline in Afghanistan and also a poppycrop as in Iran Contra. You haven't forgotten about that have you? If we were to have invaders such as them come to America we definitely would fight like Heck too wouldn't we?BY Jane on 11/27/2009 at 00:42
Hee Jane, think 9/11 or did you forget so easily? We are there to fight the roots of international terrorists! And we'll need to succeed. Otherwise we loose every credibility. NATO needs to pick up some nutches too btw!BY politics4me on 11/27/2009 at 06:04
The transnational terrorists used Afghanistan as a base of operations. You know that Jane. Mullah Omar has sworn allegiance to bin Laden. We are after them and their followers. General McChrystal will protect the Afghan people and work with them to establish better governance. He needs enough forces to keep from having to take and retake the same territory, as in a 'whack-a-mole strategy'. He must do both counterinsurgen cy(protect the people) and counterterroris m(kill the miscreants). The Taliban have this strange notion that their women should be kept in burkas which is akin to a slave wearing a leg iron. We do not agree with this shackling. We would like them to learn how to read and write and to vote. As for poppy seeds, I use them on bagels. The oil pipeline I favor is from the North slope of Alaska to the lower 40 but the liberals are forcing us to import it from the Communist nut job Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, when we should be drilling on land and in our territorial waters. Progressives say we must increase our dependence on imports because of global warming. The CRU data base, which is corrupt, is the basis for their argument. It is one of the evils of liberalism that they think this way. They need to justify the grants they get from the government.BY graham on 11/27/2009 at 08:34

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.