THE HILL
 

House to move on jobs legislation this year

By Jared Allen - 12/08/09 03:27 PM ET

The House will move as early as next week on a jobs bill anchored by at least $75 billion in spending on infrastructure.

The House will move as early as next week on a jobs bill anchored by at least $75 billion in spending on infrastructure, according to House Democrats.

“We’re moving on jobs,” Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), a chief deputy whip, said following a Tuesday afternoon Democratic Caucus meeting.
At the briefing, members were told that leaders intend on passing a jobs package of between $75 billion and $150 billion before adjourning for the year.

A package consisting of highway, road and bridge construction funding; additional aid for unemployed workers; direct financial assistance to states; and the possibility of other items ranging from small-business tax credits to billions of dollars in home weatherization tax rebates could be on the floor as early as next week, according to multiple Democrats.

Both dollar figures and a final lineup of projects remained elusive on Tuesday.

In order to pass a bill by the end of the year, the House would have to forgo committee markups.

But both Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Jim Oberstar (D-Minn.) and Highways and Transit subcommittee Chairman Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) — who has complained about the shunning of the legislative process — signaled they don’t have an issue with leadership’s plans.

Democrats have spent weeks discussing the merits of billions in new funding for highway infrastructure projects, but had not reached an agreement on how much to spend or what other measures should be included in a major job-creating bill.

Minutes before their Tuesday caucus meeting, Democratic leaders were publicly hedging on whether they could squeeze a major jobs bill into the remaining eight or so workdays left on the House calendar. Adjournment is scheduled for Dec. 18.

In addition, Democrats said they wanted to secure a commitment from the Senate — which is bogged down in healthcare reform, and likely to remain so right up until Christmas — to follow suit this year.

“There is a great desire to get it done over on the House side,” Assistant to the Speaker Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said before the meeting. “But we just have to get a sense of where the Senate is first.”

“The complication right now is that the Senate is very focused on the healthcare bill,” House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said Tuesday morning. “I don’t mean they can’t walk and chew gum at the same time. They can ... But they’re not going to have floor time to do anything else.”

But the message House leaders took into their caucus meeting a short time later was quite different.

DeFazio said that members were told that road and bridge construction was going to be a “very big portion” of the bill they’re aiming to put forward next week.

Beyond infrastructure, it remained unclear what else will be included.

President Barack Obama’s endorsement Tuesday of a program to dole out tax rebates for homeowners who weatherize their homes offered what program sponsor Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) called a “big shot in the arm.”

“This is a very practical and efficient way to create jobs immediately,” Welch said. At the same time, Welch said he still didn’t know if House leaders would include any or all of the $20 billion, two-year program in their jobs bill.

And Democrats may not know until close to the last minute.

Rep. Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.), an influential voice among the conservative Blue Dog Coalition, said a “modest” investment in infrastructure along the lines of the $75 billion would be entirely appropriate, especially if it’s paid for with unused funds originally earmarked for the nation’s banks.

Asked if that meant support for the jobs bill, Cooper said: “Well, we’ll have to see what gets tacked onto it.”

One thing that seemed clear to all, though, was the decision to act with or without the Senate in tow.

House and Senate Democrats huddled late in the afternoon to discuss plans and timing for a new jobs bill above and beyond must-pass measures such as unemployment insurance extensions and COBRA health insurance extensions.

Leaving his caucus meeting, DeFazio said the message that House Democratic leaders gave to their rank-and-file members was clear.

“The Senate is on their own time schedule and we’re going to give them an opportunity to do something meaningful about jobs before the first of the year,” DeFazio said. “If they pass on that opportunity, then that would be unfortunate.”

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/71199-house-moving-jobs-bill-next-week

Comments (11)

Good fir the House, but the problem is the Reoublican no-nothing filibuster blowahrds in the Senate. The unemployed are screwed since Repubopigs won't do the right thing and help.BY Unemployed March on 12/08/2009 at 14:58
The best, most cost-effective thing the Democrats could do to get MANY more Americans back to work is to enforce our immigration laws, which would free up many of the 8 million jobs held by illegal aliens. But the Democrats refuse to do this, and would rather pander to ethnocentric groups such as La Raza ("The Race").BY enforce immig laws on 12/08/2009 at 15:47
I love when Obama plagiarizes what Romney said 3 days ago on CNN (see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqt9Z_W0V0gfeature=player_embedded) The small business job market should have been the focus all along. We've now wasted time and TARP money trying to rescue Wall Street fat-cats and Corporate goons. You want to stimulate housing and autos!?..get people JOBS. People with JOBS buy houses and cars. People without JOBS lose houses and cars (see: http://www.repofinder.com). At least the Government is finally waking up to this. Romney 2012.BY mikedudical on 12/08/2009 at 15:51
Elizabeth Warren 2012. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-warren/america-without-a-middle_b_377829.htmlGet rid of the wealthy elitist and get someone elected that knows what to actually do with all the money this country has.BY Florida Mom on 12/08/2009 at 18:51
And how many months ago were we promised the shovel-ready projects for jobs? How many months ago were we were told unemployment will not go above 8%?BY Robert on 12/08/2009 at 18:57
Methinks that much of this money will wind up in the pockets of Obama's Goldman Sachs buddies — the crooks who donated $994,795.00 to him during the 2008 campaign.BY no hope no change on 12/08/2009 at 19:20
From what I heard today, the majority will go to union jobs. This will be an expensive joke at the expensive of the American taxpayer.BY JustMoreofTheSame on 12/08/2009 at 20:29
Regan did not put 21 million people to work but he did make an atmosphere that business liked and hired 21 million people without costing a dime and revenue from tax receipts doubled his time in office and if the dems did not have the house and senate he would have gotten rid of a lot of federal departments that waste money and did not perform and still do not perform and help the people of this country. He would have gotten rid of regulations that have hurt our factories, energy, and would have made education a competitive business allowing vouchers and giving funds to other sources instead of the failure we have today with graduating students who cannot add simple numbers and read simple books and most do not know who there senator of vice president is.BY William on 12/08/2009 at 21:58
President Barack Obama called on Congress to continue m[***]ive deficit spending and House Democrats acted within hours of his speech.BY LETS SPEND MONEY on 12/08/2009 at 23:38
Hey Obama and followers, Don't bite the hand that feeds you! The American people!! Maybe give businesses a reason to succeed instead of taxing them more and more to where they cant stay in business. How does that help the economy??The government needs to quit trying to control every single thing and let the people start to make some decisions. Stop putting so much pressure on small to medium size businesses and taxing the crud out of them, and instead start giving them an incentive to succeed and create jobs. Small to medium size businesses are the back bone of this country, the Government should be rewarding them instead of punishing them by taking half there profits. If a business employs people then it is fueling the economy. Create an incentive for Big businesses to keep employment positions in the USA creating more jobs, there for fueling the economy. [***]o!! Its common sense. Congress, why are you doing everything backwards? I don't get how you have the best interest of the people at heart when your making the decisions you are making. I know its all for money, but think about it, you can make the right decisions and right changes for the benefit of the people, and in return you the government grows and makes more money as well. Lord help usBY Jason on 12/08/2009 at 23:55

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.