THE HILL
 

Pelosi puts two issues aside to press forward on healthcare reform

By Jared Allen - 03/08/10 07:00 AM ET

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has put the lid on two of the more contentious issues that last week were threatening to divert critical attention away from healthcare’s home stretch.

At the beginning of last week, Pelosi was facing the return of a Caucus that was as fractured over the $15 billion jobs bill as it had been over any other issue before the House last year.

And at the same time, a year’s worth of questions about the future of Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) came to a head when the Ethics Committee admonished the New York Democrat for accepting corporate sponsored trips in 2007 and 2008, a violation of the House rules put in place by Pelosi.

Rangel’s immediate insistence that he would remain chairman of the Ways and Means Committee quickly put the spotlight on Pelosi herself. But in a matter of days – and before she endured too much damage by again sticking with her chairman – Rangel’s resolve yielded to the reality that he would have to relinquish his gavel.

That decision only resulted in yet another problem for Pelosi, though, when she faced a near-revolt from the Caucus over the possibility that she would allow Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) to assume the chairmanship.

While the Rangel-Stark uproar dominated the headlines – and nearly overshadowed President Barack Obama’s mid-week speech, in which he implored Democrats to finish healthcare reform and blessed the use of reconciliation rules allowing the Senate to pass a package of healthcare amendments by a 51-vote majority – Pelosi also found herself needing to whip a Senate-passed jobs bill that was on the verge of collapse.

Yet by Thursday night, Pelosi had overseen the quick transition from Stark to Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.), who many Democrats believe has enough of the Caucus’ confidence to remain in place as interim chairman until at least the completion of healthcare reform, and had locked down the votes of conservative Blue Dogs and quelled a second revolt from the Congressional Black Caucus over the jobs bill.

The warding off of those two issues will likely go a long way toward helping the Speaker focus on a more positive priority -- working on bringing the healthcare bill home.

And the timing couldn’t be more crucial. The White House has laid down an end-of-the-month marker for completing healthcare, and House Democrats are by all accounts short – by anywhere from a few to perhaps more than a dozen – of the votes needed to pass the Senate bill and a second package of “fixes” that the Senate and White House will agree to.

With so much work ahead of them, House leaders can ill-afford another week of distractions.

The horizon is not completely cloudless, however.

Pelosi could potentially be drawn into another ethics scandal over Rep. Eric Massa (D-N.Y.). On Friday the freshman Democrat announced his intention to resign on Monday, acknowledging that a pending Ethics Committee investigation into allegations that Massa made inappropriate comments to a male staffer “would tear my family and my staff apart.”

Massa’s resignation ends the inquiry, but Pelosi faced questions on Thursday about when she learned of the charges against one of her members. She responded that her staff never informed her.

That put her opposite Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), who was told about the allegations and instructed his staff to give Massa or someone from his office 48 hours to report the incident to the Ethics Committee before the Majority Leader’s office did it for him.

On Thursday, Pelosi brushed off a question about why her staff chose to keep her in the dark.

“A one, two, three person removed rumor that had been reported to Mr. Hoyer's office that had been reported to my staff, which they didn't report to me, because, you know what? This is rumor city,” she said. “Every single day there are rumors. I have a job to do and not to be the receiver of rumors.”

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/85363-pelosi-puts-two-distracting-issues-behind-her-to-press-forward-on-healthcare

Comments (48)

It's difficult to be the queen bee when you're court of Jesters are busy looting the Treasury.BY Baloney Guy on 03/08/2010 at 06:39
Nobody, and I mean nobody, ever won money betting against Madam Speaker. She is the strongest of the three.BY whylie on 03/08/2010 at 06:39
Here's what health care will bring.A man of 22 died in agony of dehydration after three days in a leading teaching hospital.Kane Gorny was so desperate for a drink that he rang police to beg for their help.They arrived on the ward only to be told by doctors that everything was under control.The next day his mother Rita Cronin found him delirious and he died within hours.Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1255858/Neglected-lazy-nurses-Kane-Gorny-22-dying-thirst-rang-police-beg-water.htmlBY Baloney Guy on 03/08/2010 at 07:26
Fear is all you got.BY whylie on 03/08/2010 at 07:32
It is sad that abortion has to be the one thing to kill this bill, instead of common sense. I would bet a million bucks that there is zero chance for this thing to p[***] by he newest deadline of 3/18. Even if the House could get the votes, which they can't without more bribes, recon will take months. Then will be repealed thru recon by the sam enew rules the Dems will try to use. Obama will single handedly destroy the integrity of the Senate and it will be all out political war for the foreseeable future. Sad days for our country indeed.BY Tony T on 03/08/2010 at 07:42
A quote from Nancy" After years of historic deficits,this 110th Congress will commit itself to a higher standard: pay-as-you-go, no new deficit spendind. Our new america will provide unlimited oppprtunity for future genrations, not burden them with mountains of debt" Navcy Pelosi 2007. This as all thiing coming from Washington is just another lie. If nothing else would kill this bill would not pay-as-you-go for we do not have the money to pay for this so called Health Care Reform. But there again pay-as-you-go only apples to what they want it towhen thay wont it to.Even not burden generations with mountains of dept it well take several generations to pay for this as well as all the other money Obama and his Obamanites have spent just in his frist year of office. Lord help us all we have 3 more years of this spending spree. I would like to know what IDIOT said that the Democrats is for the poor man or working man what a lie. America we must thke OUR GOVERNMENT BACK.BY Everett Barber on 03/08/2010 at 08:07
How many vote to repeal it in the senate? 67, forget about it. When our president signs this reform into law, it's over for you.BY whylie on 03/08/2010 at 08:13
The democratic party is the party of abortion and tax and big spending. That is all they stand for. The republician party is the party of big spending. Both parties are tonedeaf and out of touch with reality and haven't represented the American people in decades!BY UGLY RUMORS on 03/08/2010 at 08:35
IT LOOKS LIKE THINGS ARE OF A DISARRAY IN CONGRESS. WHEN YOU GET A BUNCH OF THIEVES AND LIARS IN THE SAME ROOM THINGS WILL SOON BLOW APART.BY Don on 03/08/2010 at 08:44
The House members rightfully do not believe either Pelosi, Reid or Obama that any differences in the Senate and House bill will be rectified by reconciliation AT A LATER DATE. Really?? News flash, IF the House p[***]es the Senate bill, and they have to p[***] it AS IS WITH NO CHANGES, it will go to Obama and he will sign it into law and that will be the last we see of the health care debate. We the people will be stuck with a pork laden, quality of care destroying, cost increasing, deficit destroying POS. The Democrat leaders are saying "once we see it, and find nothing will change, our opinion will change." BUT what they aren't saying is that the "benefits" won't be enacted until 2014, but the taxes will. We won't see the true impact of this legislation for 4 years—until AFTER the 2014 election, and this is no coincidence. There are no "coincidences" with this administration.They will collect 10 years of taxes to fund 6 years of benefits and the uninsured STILL will have to wait another 4 years to see any coverage. But they need to rush this through to "take care of the uninsured." To this I say bull manure.BY 2Confused on 03/08/2010 at 08:45

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.