Sergeant at arms says waving staffers through checkpoints is security breach
U.S. Capitol Police are violating security protocol by not
consistently screening staffers accompanying lawmakers, the House
sergeant at arms said Wednesday.
Sergeant at Arms Bill Livingood told the House Appropriations
Committee’s Legislative Branch subcommittee that there have been
“inconsistencies” when it comes to enforcing the policy that every
staffer must be screened through metal detectors when entering the U.S.
Capitol building.
Livingood said he and Capitol Police Chief Phillip Morse have been
addressing the issue with officers to make sure they screen every
person who comes through an entrance to the Capitol if he or she is not
a law enforcement official or member of Congress.
There have been multiple instances when lawmakers were running late
to votes or meetings in the Capitol and officers waved through
accompanying staff members without screening them for weapons or
contraband first, according to several members at the Legislative
Branch subcommittee hearing on Wednesday and in interviews afterward.
Livingood’s acknowledgement of breakdowns in security procedure
comes less than a week after a gunman dressed like a Pentagon employee
opened fire on two officers at an entrance to the building, wounding
three officers in the process.
It also comes just three years after a staff member for Sen. Jim
Webb (D-Va.) was arrested trying to carry a loaded pistol and two
loaded ammunition clips into the Russell Senate Office Building in a
briefcase. After some confusion about whose gun it was and whether the
staffer knew it was in the briefcase, the charges were eventually
dismissed.
In addition to the security concerns, lawmakers complained that not
knowing what security procedures to expect prevents them from moving as
swiftly as possible through the complex.
“I completely understand that we need to have more restricted access
to the Capitol, but we don’t have consistent reinforcement of that,”
said Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), the subcommittee
chairwoman, at the hearing.
“And when you’re ... trying to get through your day and you’re
clotheslined at a door — that some days you have access with staff, and
some days you don’t — it’s frustrating and it impedes the progress of
your day.”
Wasserman Schultz emphasized that she didn’t have a problem with
screening staffers who accompany lawmakers through Capitol entrances,
but she stressed the need to have the same screening standards at all
entrances at all times.
Livingood made clear that the policy is for all staff entering the
Capitol to be screened through the metal detectors at each entrance,
regardless of who they are walking with.
“I’ve reviewed this with Capitol Police Chief Morse and there is no change in the current policy,” Livingood said.
Livingood assured Wasserman Schultz that he would be notifying
lawmakers of the uniform screening protocol in the coming weeks so they
know what to expect when bringing staff with them.
When asked whether the Capitol Police department was aware of the
inconsistencies, a Capitol Police spokeswoman said, “Regarding the
security of the Capitol Campus, the U.S. Capitol Police work in concert
with the respective sergeant at arms and the U.S. Capitol Police Board
to address any security items.”
The House does not require criminal background checks to be conducted on the 8,000 staff members who work with lawmakers.
Rep. Steven LaTourette (R-Ohio) said that it’s a member’s
responsibility to make sure he or she doesn’t hire criminals who could
accompany the lawmaker in circumventing metal detectors while
potentially carrying a weapon into the Capitol.
“Shame on the member if the member, if they’re bringing a criminal
in the building,” said LaTourette, who sits on the subcommittee but did
not attend the hearing.
After being briefed about the panel’s discussion, LaTourette said he was fine with lawmakers vouching for a staff member.
Rep. Dan Lungren (Calif.) said he was OK with police not screening
staffers who accompany members through entrances, saying lawmakers
should be allowed to vouch for their staff. Lungren is the ranking
Republican on the House Administration Committee, which also oversees
the Capitol Police.
“I’ve seen different approaches used and it seemed to me in most
instances it was whether or not the people monitoring the magnetometers
were familiar with the member or not,” he said in an interview.
“I personally do not have a problem with a member vouching for a staff person or family member being waved through. Now, maybe I need to sit down with Bill Livingood and talk about that.”










Most Viewed RSS Feed »
