THE HILL
 

Obama hits China with steep tire tariffs

By Ian Swanson - 09/11/09 09:56 PM ET

The White House late Friday announced it would impose high tariffs on imports of Chinese tires in a case seen as the first test of trade policy under President Barack Obama.

A 35 percent duty will be set on the tires from China for a year, followed by a 30 percent tariff for a second year and a 25 percent tariff for a third year. The tariffs come in addition to a 4 percent tariff already applied.

The petition for the tariffs was brought by the United Steelworkers union, which argued that increased imports from China had led to the closure of U.S. plants and elimination of U.S. jobs.

Labor groups had urged Obama to impose the relief, which represents the first time a “safeguard” mechanism approved by Congress in 2000 has been used. The safeguard was included in a law that provided China with more favorable trade terms when it joined the World Trade Organization. Former President George W. Bush rejected several petitions during his presidency.

Importers and several companies that manufacture tires along with the Chinese government had urged the White House not to impose the higher tariffs. Several major tire companies, including Goodyear and Firestone, import tires from China and did not support the petition from the steelworkers.

The decision is likely to be criticized by China and other international trade partners. It comes less than two weeks before Obama is to host a summit of world leaders in Pittsburgh known as the G20. At a previous G20 meeting in London earlier this year, Obama and other leaders pledged to not take protectionist measures amid the global recession.

The announcement was made in a release sent out by the White House press office at about 9:30 p.m. Friday night, a time when news is sometimes “dumped” in the hope it will attract less attention.

Obama was not quoted in the statement from White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, who said the president had decided to remedy a “clear disruption” in the U.S. tire industry.

The steelworkers petition arrived at Obama’s desk after the International Trade Commission, a quasi judicial body that considers the petitions, recommended that he provide relief. Under U.S. law, the president can accept the ITC’s recommendation or reject the petition. Obama had until Sept. 17 to make a decision.

U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk said that by imposing the relief, the administration was enforcing U.S. trade laws.

“When China came in to the WTO, the U.S. negotiated the ability to impose remedies in situations like this one,” he said in a statement “This administration is doing what is necessary to enforce trade agreements on behalf of American workers and manufacturers.”

Groups representing importers blasted the decision.

“We are certainly disheartened that the president bowed to the union and disregarded the interests of the thousands of other American workers and consumers,” said Marguerite Trossevin, a counsel to the American Coalition for Free Trade in Tires.

Several House Democrats who in the past had urged Bush to grant relief to groups that had sought measures to restrict imports from China hailed the move.

“The American tire industry lost more than 5,000 jobs since China flooded our market with cheap tires and stood to lose thousands more without this corrective action,” said Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.

Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.) said the action was an important step in a new trade policy.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/58383-obama-hits-china-with-tariffs-on-tires

Comments (8)

Will anybody on the worldstage still listen when Obama speaks out against trade protectionism? Also a few points:(1.) Why announce it several days before the deadline, during the "news dump" hour of late Friday evening - hoping that no one will notice? Why so shy about it? Mr. Obama !(2.) Why are the US tire manufacturers not supporting it?(3.) Can this save any US jobs really or just force the manufacturers move to another lost cost country?(4.) Two thirds of the tires imported from China to US are made by American tire companies who set up shops in China. (5.) For every job saved, there might be two lost, and consumer ended up paying more, making US car industry less competitive.(6.) China can retaliate - no more US chicken, for example. (Personally I like US beef, so that should continue). (7.) The "surge" of China made tires coming to US has stopped, 2008 over 2007 greww by 2.2%; 1H 2009 over 1H 2008 dropped by 16%. Why do this now? (8.) Disclaimer: I voted for Obama, and donated money to his compaign.(8.) My two cents: bowing to the pressure of United steekworkers / powerful labor unions in exchange for liberal Democrats' support for health care reform. Doing something quite regrettable for a political reason, long term harmful to US interests by damaging free trade, and also by damaging Obama's own credibility on world stage. Not worth it, bad move.BY Eugene Zhao on 09/12/2009 at 02:29
This will just hurt free trade, which will reduce jobs in the US by hurting those companies who export, and it will hurt lower-icome people who will have to pay more for tires, as if they already weren't getting hurt enough.The Chinese specialize in low end tires which are what people buy when they cannot afford name brands or just need a tire to get to work, do mundane things. This is not going to hurt the Porsche driver who needs a high-performance tire, but the night cook at a Denny's who just needs something to hang on his 12 year old Taurus to get to work and back.This is disgusting and morally wrong, but that's what happens when you make payoffs to unions. Doesn't affect the price of arugula, so Bama will never know.BY Harry Schell on 09/12/2009 at 13:14
How can anyone think that it is good policy to enrage the Chinese who own a major proportion of our debt? And, how can anyone think that there is any logic at all in putting a tariff on a product (cheap tires) which are NOT produced in America? Who is protecting what? At least the world knows now what we have learned the hard way — he lies!BY Hope N. Change on 09/12/2009 at 19:45
And now China is going to investigate Auto and Chicken imports..http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-09/13/content_8686552 .htmThis may cost America even more jobs!BY Diane Lange on 09/13/2009 at 15:58
"beggar thy neighbor" trade policies have arrived and just in time to turn what might have been the start of a recovery into a double dip recession.It would require real leadership for America to lean into the boat and accept that poor people everywhere who can do the work that unionized Americans do now not only produce quality goods at much cheaper prices [thus saving the consumer bundles], but also free up our better educated American workers for jobs that require that better education — and thus pay more on the world market.I guess we don't have such leadership in America.Or at least "Hope" and "Change" do not mean more realistic economics and policies.BY Spock_rhp on 09/14/2009 at 17:16
where does the president garner the constitutional authority to impose a tariff?article 1, section 8 of the constitution clearly gives congress the power to "regulate commerce with foreign nations"????BY chb on 09/14/2009 at 19:40
This tariff to address 5,168 jobs lost in a segment of the tire industry the domestic manufactures abandoned 3 to 4 years ago. They themselves decided to produce in the 1st and 2nd tier tire product offerings only, and build their own, or buy in to Chinese factories. Congrats Obama, used tire sales will increase, and people will run on unsafe tires to save money. Brilliant. An already much abused part of the automobile has just been made worse. At 75 miles an hour, I would much rather be on the road with a car on Chinese produced tires than worn out tires. All this not to mention what China may do with our mounting debt and their own actions against "our" exporters to China. Just needed to vent.BY Bob S. on 09/14/2009 at 19:43
this is interesting.BY evan ross on 09/22/2009 at 13:50

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.