By Elana Schor - 06/27/06 12:00 AM EDT
Ending the Senate tradition of anonymous holds on legislation is a “non-negotiable item” for ongoing lobbying-reform negotiations, 29 senators wrote to their chamber’s conferees in a letter sent Friday.
The Senate voted overwhelmingly in the spring to require members to acknowledge publicly within three days when they place a hold on a pending bill, in a lobbying-reform amendment sponsored by Sens. Ron WydenRon WydenObama official pledges 'adjustments' to controversial Medicare proposal Senate Dem blocks intelligence authorization over FBI surveillance A bipartisan bright spot we can’t afford to pass up: child welfare reform MORE (D-Ore.), Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleyPollster: Clinton leads in 5 battlegrounds Overnight Tech: Judiciary leaders question internet transition plan | Clinton to talk tech policy | Snowden's robot | Trump's big digital push Dozens of senators push EPA for higher ethanol mandate MORE (R-Iowa) and James InhofeJames InhofeEPA proposes climate rule incentives despite court hold GOP chairman: EPA could ‘restructure every industrial sector’ GOP in disarray over Trump furor MORE (R-Okla.).
But with the House still waiting to name its lobbying-reform conferees and talks on reconciling the two chambers’ versions appearing increasingly stalled, the three senators and a bipartisan group of allies reminded their colleagues in no uncertain terms that the eventual conference report on lobbying reform should preserve the public-holds provision.
“The use of anonymous holds in the Senate undermines public accountability. … The Senate has spoken, and we expect this standing order to remain intact,” the 29 senators wrote.
There are no plans to send the letter across the Capitol because ending secret holds would require only a Senate rules change, as the letter points out: “The hold is a unique feature of the Senate … with no equivalent in the House of Representatives.”