Senate Republicans are planning a new push for a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution when lawmakers return to Washington after the August recess.
GOP Sens. Jim DeMint (S.C.), Lindsey GrahamLindsey GrahamTrump’s feud with the press in the spotlight Senators eye new sanctions against Iran Republicans play clean up on Trump's foreign policy MORE (S.C.), John McCainJohn McCainHow does placing sanctions on Russia help America? THE MEMO: Trump's wild first month Trump’s feud with the press in the spotlight MORE (Ariz.) and Tom CoburnTom CoburnCoburn: Trump's tweets aren't presidential The road ahead for America’s highways Rethinking taxation MORE (Okla.) will lead the charge in the fall, when Democrats plan to debate raising taxes on families that earn more than $250,000 a year.
They believe the proposal, which came within one vote of passing Congress in 1995, will gain new political traction in the weeks before the election, when federal deficits are a chief concern of many voters.
“We’ll bring that back between now and the election,” DeMint, chairman of the Senate Republican Steering Committee, told The Hill.
In February, the lawmakers introduced a resolution to establish a balanced budget amendment; DeMint reintroduced it last week so that he could bring it straight to the floor after the recess.
“In the last week there’s been a lot of movement in terms of Republican senators saying we need to press this issue,” said a Senate GOP aide.
The amendment would bar the federal government from spending more than it collects in revenues each year. It would also require a two-thirds majority vote in each chamber to raise taxes.
A balanced budget amendment has polled well in several Senate battlegrounds, according to a Republican strategist familiar with internal polling.
The Congressional Budget Office reported Thursday that the federal deficit reached $1.2 trillion after the first 10 months of the fiscal year.
Republicans captured Congress in the 1994 midterm election by campaigning on the need for a balanced budget amendment when the federal deficit was only $203 billion.
A slew of Republican candidates in strong positions to join the Senate next year have endorsed amending the Constitution.
They are Rand PaulRand PaulTrump’s feud with the press in the spotlight Rand Paul: We’re very lucky John McCain’s not in charge Rand Paul: John Bolton would be a 'bad choice' for national security adviser MORE in Kentucky, Marco RubioMarco RubioGOP loses top Senate contenders How does placing sanctions on Russia help America? Republicans play clean up on Trump's foreign policy MORE in Florida, Pat Toomey in Pennsylvania, Ken Buck in Colorado, Sharron Angle in Nevada, Mike LeeMike LeeTop antitrust senators call for Sessions to scrutinize AT&T-Time Warner merger Public lands dispute costs Utah a major trade show GOP senators unveil bill to give Congress control of consumer bureau budget MORE in Utah, Dino Rossi in Washington and Ron JohnsonRon JohnsonDems ask for hearings on Russian attempts to attack election infrastructure GOP senators unveil bill to give Congress control of consumer bureau budget GOP gets bolder in breaking with Trump MORE in Wisconsin.
A GOP strategist familiar with internal polling in some of these races says that surveys show strong public support for a balanced budget amendment, exceeding 65 percent in at least one race.
Republican aides acknowledge they have virtually no chance of passing an amendment this year, when Democrats control 59 Senate seats and a large majority in the House.
But they say a debate this fall could set the groundwork for next year, when Congress is expected to debate the recommendations of the fiscal responsibility commission appointed by President Obama.
A resolution to amend the Constitution requires two-thirds support of the Senate and the House. It would also require ratification by 38 states.
“No one is saying that a balanced budget would immediately pass, but the tide has turned as the majority of people in America realize that deficits are a big problem,” said a Senate GOP aide.
Several Democratic senators have supported such a proposal in the past.
Democratic Sens. Max BaucusMax BaucusFive reasons why Tillerson is likely to get through Business groups express support for Branstad nomination The mysterious sealed opioid report fuels speculation MORE (Mont.), Tom HarkinTom HarkinGrassley challenger no stranger to defying odds Clinton ally stands between Sanders and chairmanship dream Do candidates care about our health or just how much it costs? MORE (Iowa) and Herb Kohl (Wis.) voted for a balanced budget amendment when it came to the floor in March of 1995. Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenTop union offers backing for Ellison in DNC race John Kerry to teach at Yale on global issues Ellison needles Perez for 'unverifiable' claim of DNC support MORE, who then represented Delaware, also voted for it.
Sen. Byron Dorgan (N.D.), a Democrat who voted against the amendment, will retire after this year, and other opponents such as Sens. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) and Patty MurrayPatty MurraySenate Dems move to nix Trump's deportation order Oprah's network provides Senate with tape of abuse allegations by Puzder's ex-wife: report How many GOP senators will stand up to megadonor DeVos? Just 2. MORE (D-Wash.) face tough reelections.
The idea has bipartisan support in the House.
A group of centrist Blue Dog Democrats introduced legislation earlier this year to add a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution.
A resolution sponsored by Rep. Bobby Bright (D-Ala.) has 42 Democratic co-sponsors.
GOP candidates who could join the Republican Conference next year, such as Paul of Kentucky and Lee of Utah, have said they would press for a debate on the amendment early in the 112th Congress.
A popular element of the amendment is the requirement of a supermajority to raise taxes.
“The point of that is so that raising taxes won’t be the default way to balance the budget,” said DeMint. “The whole idea is to cut spending.”
A senior Senate Republican aide who works on tax policy said that creating a supermajority threshold could be part of a grand legislative compromise that emerges from the recommendations of the fiscal responsibility commission.
He said Republicans might be more willing to accept tax increases to reduce the deficit if they were assured that it would be much more difficult to raise taxes in the future.
“It could be part of a grand bargain,” said the aide.
But DeMint is skeptical of that prospect.
“I support a supermajority to raise taxes,” he said. “But to use it as leverage to agree to other tax increases, I’m not sure.”
DeMint said he wanted to first see the recommendations of Obama’s commission, which is due to report by Dec. 1.
“Hopefully it’s robust spending cuts, because that’s what Americans are expecting,” he said.